I believe he's referring to the entire MacRumors forums. People are posting complaining about a lack of a new Mac Pro even in threads that have nothing remotely to do with a Mac Pro. At least the "Safari is snappier" post can sometimes be humorous and can fit into most threads subject. The Mac Pro post are just sad when people post them for the sake of posting them.
As far as the original topic that we should be discussing, I agree that this patent technology would work well for an iWatch.
$1.69?
oh, oh.
The S Beam does sound novel.
"Considering that the patent was originally filed in January 2010, it would mean that the application must have been made public in early to mid-2011."
http://www.patentlyapple.com/patent...ent-for-samsung-like-beam-edoc-transfers.html
Oh, wait.
So I'm running low on room on my iPhone. Let me buy a movie, for example, and set it to download to my laptop and not my iPhone.
Now THAT would be a great idea
So I'm running low on room on my iPhone. Let me buy a movie, for example, and set it to download to my laptop and not my iPhone.
Now THAT would be a great idea
Maybe not properly yet.So, Apple had this idea three years ago and still has not figured out how to implement it? Brilliant.
Way too many Mac Pro comments around here...
So, Apple had this idea three years
ago and still has not figured out how to implement it? Brilliant.
The patent required hardware, Apple chose to keep out of the iPhone, mostly due to power usage, but also due to size and cost constraints. When stuff gets cheaper, smaller and less electron thirsty, Apple will implement it.
What do you want to imply? Samsung invented proximity based sharing?
What do you want to imply? Samsung invented proximity based sharing?
This might be nice for purchasing content too large to immediatly download on cellular networks.
What do you want to imply? Samsung invented proximity based sharing?