Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
he tried to back out. he bought it because he was forced to buy it.
Because his mouth wrote a check he was legally forced to cash.

Of course, the capital he's lost by chopping Twitter's value in half through ineptitude and inadequacy turns out to be more than he'd have lost in lawsuits for backing out of that check his mouth wrote. So he made himself a problem and "solved" it by nailing himself onto a far worse one. Banks and lenders see this. Then they see him chop away at it even further by stupidly endorsing antisemitic posts. And the losers, of course, are the holders of TSLA, because in the end Elmo is going to have to keep selling, selling, selling his holdings in his attempts to save Twitter from himself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seek3r and arkitect
Except it wasn't an endorsement, which proves you do not understand the context of the overall conversation. You read little snips on webpages like this, and other Left leaning crap blogs, that frame the narrative for you, and off you go.
oh? and you believe this?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8072.jpeg
    IMG_8072.jpeg
    761.3 KB · Views: 96
It's not necessary to "fully" disinvest from China. 50% would get the job done.

IF....if the jobs were all brought back to the USA. In fact, none of those jobs are being brought back here. They're being moved to India and Vietnam.

THAT is why President Trump is a big thing. That and only that.

Those jobs were never in America, they can't come back.
Manufacturing output in the US is higher than it's ever been, the myth that the US doesn't make anything is just propaganda.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: jaymc and seek3r
And in a week no one will care about this and will be onto something else. Internet focused groups are all over this. In my daily life, no one cares.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: the future
What did Musk say? The highlight link in the article doesn’t show anything and I don’t use Twitter to delve deeper.
“I am deeply offended by ADL’s messaging and any other groups who push de facto anti-white racism or anti-Asian racism or racism of any kind,” he said. “I’m sick of it. Stop now,”
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaPhox
“I am deeply offended by ADL’s messaging and any other groups who push de facto anti-white racism or anti-Asian racism or racism of any kind,” he said. “I’m sick of it. Stop now,”
He called "the actual truth" a post saying "Jewish communities" push "dialectical hatred against whites."

No, Elmo, ADL isn't pushing "de facto anti-white racism." What you mean is that the ADL is showcasing the explosion of racism, including antisemitism, on your site since you suckered yourself into buying it, and you're dipping into the tinfoil hat factory looking for things to say "look over there" about.
 
You do understand that SpaceX is the US space program now right?
Yes, and this is the first recorded time in all of American history in which the US Government has been stupidly shortsighted.

Although, to give him credit, as of today Elmo has gotten us 90 mi / 238855 mi = 0.0377% of the way to the moon.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Morod
He called "the actual truth" a post saying "Jewish communities" push "dialectical hatred against whites."

To be clear, THIS is what got him in trouble, not what he said in a follow up about the ADL. People keep saying "he's just criticizing the ADL" (and I agree the ADL deserves criticism, though not for the lame "white people are the real victims" reason Musk thinks), but the initial controversy was about the re-Tweet that mentioned "Jewish communities". If the Tweet meant to criticize the ADL, then it should've said "ADL", not "Jewish communities". That quote also decried "hordes of minorities".
 
Except it wasn't an endorsement, which proves you do not understand the context of the overall conversation. You read little snips on webpages like this, and other Left leaning crap blogs, that frame the narrative for you, and off you go.
Really? @Redneck1089, please explain what it was if not an endorsement. 🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
Those jobs were never in America, they can't come back.
Manufacturing output in the US is higher than it's ever been, the myth that the US doesn't make anything is just propaganda.
Zenith, Sylvania, RCA, Magnavox, Motorola. All US brands of televisions. Radios were also made by those brands. All manufactured from the ground up to being purchased right here in the USA. Later VCR's were branded with these names but they were manufactured over there. They stopped making televisions and just put their name on TV's made over there.

What kind of "American" power tools do you own, DEWALT, Milwaukee, Black & Decker, Stanley? Every power tool like that on the shelves of the big box store is made in China by one of two Chinese companies.

Microwave ovens? GE, Whirlpool etc. made by one of two Chinese companies over there. No matter how high end and expensive.

The "American" cars sold are mostly made outside the USA, whether they are wholly imported or just assembled here from parts made mostly over there. We used to manufacture the entire car here. Every nut, bolt and wire and piece of rubber. We imported rubber and turned the rubber into higher value finished products.

Now we cut down trees and ship the lumber over there along with other natural resources for the Chinese to produce the higher valued manufactured products. We are the third world colony supplying them.

THAT is what the Chinese officials meant when they scolded Blinken at that meeting in Alaska. Most of what Amazon sells is made in China. You can buy much of what's there directly from Chinese sellers on the internet like AliExpress.

This country is hollowed out and getting weaker by the month. Everyone can see it. The wealthy live in their self created bubble and keep the decay out of their sight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morod
Uhm... what Musk said is exactly right:

"The ADL unjustly attacks the majority of the West, despite the majority of the West supporting the Jewish people and Israel. This is because they cannot, by their own tenets, criticize the minority groups who are their primary threat.
It is not right and needs to stop."

What the H E double hockey sticks is antisemitic about this comment? This is just another case of the liberal minorities canceling and bullying people who call them out.
Since you seem to have a secret decoder ring for understanding Musk, can you please enlighten us on who “the majority of the west” and “the minority groups” are in that comment?
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: jaymc
Everyone is opinionated, especially under the guise of anonymity. luckily most of it is drowned in the ocean of opinions. But for high-profile people, instead of it being drowned out, it is amplified, and the sea even parts ways for it.

X is a privately held company by Musk himself so he doesn't have anyone to answer to. Well, except his creditors. He can do and say whatever he wants. It will be interesting to see if he tempers his ways for the viability of the company, or if he goes down with the ship.
 
Meanwhile Apple meets with China’s dictator, Xi, and has no issue doing business with a country that places little value on human rights and has an enormous concentration camp filled with Uyghurs.

These mega corporations pandering and faux outrage is beyond parody at this point.
I think you need to invest into a new morality ruler 'cause the one you are using is just a twig. That being said, Free Tibet, freedom to Uyghurs, and hands of Taiwan and Apple Silicone!
 
The irony. Musk bought Twitter to stop this madness. He bought it because he didn't like that a small group of PC extremists were able to control what nearly three-hundred-and-fifty-million people were saying/doing. And here is Apple, raising their hands like... hey, look at us! We're in that group too!
That's like saying Apple wants to control what people read by not giving every single library a donation.

Musk has enough money. If his primary goal was to give free speech to everyone, he could keep running Twitter at a loss for a century. Why does Apple need to contribute? Perhaps because Musk also likes money more than free speech. If you say that any company is controlling Twitter by not paying Twitter (which makes limited sense), then it's only because Musk lets them (because he clearly wants to be paying even less).
 
  • Like
Reactions: heretiq
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.