When will cvs allow Apple pay again?
At some retailers I still have to "sign" after I use Apple Pay.
I resent that. Once I touch my thumb, the transaction should be DONE.
Whole Foods because it's the only place I've found to use it (and I suspect most other people too)
Pay works at the grocery chain Sprouts thanks their installations of NFC readers.
Pay swung it to W for me.
Pay at MacDonald's (once or twice) and at the soda machine (!) at my car dealer. I hadn't seen a soda/snack machine with a card reader before until I ran into that one and just had to try
Pay on it, successfully.
Pay at RadioShack, too, but I rarely shop there. Had to get some alligator clips for a project I'm working on, and the nearest Fry's is quite a few miles away.
Pay? It's been a while since I've been in there.
Pay at Toys 'R Us but I have the Toys 'R Us MasterCard that is tied to my membership there. Alas, last I tried that Synchrony Card still does not work with
Pay, so I wind up swiping my card to earn Rewards. Kind of ironic, isn't it? I hope Toys 'R Us and Apple get something worked out soon. Hell, Amazon got its Visa card straightened out pretty quickly.Google Wallet was also held back for years by the carriers, who wanted to promote their own payment system.
It wasn't until April 2014 that Wallet finally broke free of those chains, with a new version that requires at least KitKat. Older models and even some major devices with KitKat (e.g. Nexus 7, S3, Note 3) are not able to use it.
You mean 2014. As noted above, the Google Wallet version that recently accounted for 4% of digital dollars, is less than eight months old and only runs on later gear / OSes.
So from a very simplistic view, something that's been out for 8 months is being used to spend 4x as many dollars as something that's been out 2 months. Which makes raw sense.
I'll never use Apple pay. I like less reliance on a device, not more.
TouchID is neither a signature nor a card PIN replacement.
It is a convenient shortcut for the phone unlock PIN.
The fingerprint sensor hasn't verified anything, except that it matched the last person with access to the phone and its unlock PIN, who registered a finger.
If they wanted to be super secure, they'd ask for photo id... as well as an instant photo of the purchaser that could be stored to prove a match
But that's not their goal. The goal is speedy checkouts, which encourage more buying, and that's how everyone makes money.
Moreover, if it was totally secure and payment was assured, then there'd be no need for banks to charge fees. But again, such perfection is definitely not their purpose in life. The CC companies exist to charge for mitigating the risk of payment.
You were not verified with a fingerprint that was stored on the phone, because the merchant... just as with your signature example... did not compare the fingerprint to your actual finger.
There is a coming standard for fingerprint authentication for EMV payments, but it would require the fingerprint to be taken at a bank and stored with your other account info at the bank. Any print authentication would be compared to the data on file. That's the only way to be sure the finger on the device sensor at the time of purchase is really yours.
Do you see the difference? An on-device fingerprint can be changed by anyone who steals your phone and knows your PIN, ergo it is only as secure as your device PIN. That's why Google Wallet and the Apple Watch only need a device PIN to activate the purchase app.
TouchID is more about making spending convenient, while making the user feel more secure.
Personally, the limitation of Apple Pay is the lowest common denominator...
Only selected iPhone's can use it.. Only because of NFC. Weather its more secure etc......
Grandpa & Grandma wouldn't exactly using Apple Pay for example.
My mom is 82 and uses Pay on a daily basis. Has started buying her groceries at Meijer instead of Kroger because of the security and convenience.
At some retailers I still have to "sign" after I use Apple Pay.
I resent that. Once I touch my thumb, the transaction should be DONE.
Especially interesting given how much of a flap there was about CVS refusing Apple Pay. I wonder how many customers they sent to Walgreens to try out Apple Pay?
Pay
Pay is so convenient to use. I'm doing everything that I can to support it.Is Whole Foods a west coast chain? I've never heard of them once before Apple Pay was announced. It sounds like a cheap, discount supermarket but from the comments I'm reading it sounds like they're pricey.
Hopefully when they realize that CurrentC is a big ball of turd.
![]()
TouchID is neither a signature nor a card PIN replacement.
It is a convenient shortcut for the phone unlock PIN.
The fingerprint sensor hasn't verified anything, except that it matched the last person with access to the phone and its unlock PIN, who registered a finger.
You were not verified with a fingerprint that was stored on the phone, because the merchant... just as with your signature example... did not compare the fingerprint to your actual finger.
There is a coming standard for fingerprint authentication for EMV payments, but it would require the fingerprint to be taken at a bank and stored with your other account info at the bank. Any print authentication would be compared to the data on file. That's the only way to be sure the finger on the device sensor at the time of purchase is really yours.
Do you see the difference? An on-device fingerprint can be changed by anyone who steals your phone and knows your PIN, ergo it is only as secure as your device PIN. That's why Google Wallet and the Apple Watch only need a device PIN to activate the purchase app.
TouchID is more about making spending convenient, while making the user feel more secure.
I never really understood why we didn't have our pictures on credit cards. That seemed like something that was going to happen and then it just didn't take off.
Will grocers like Safeway and Frys ever support it?
Is Whole Foods a west coast chain? I've never heard of them once before Apple Pay was announced. It sounds like a cheap, discount supermarket but from the comments I'm reading it sounds like they're pricey.
Google Wallet was also held back for years by the carriers, who wanted to promote their own payment system.
It wasn't until April 2014 that Wallet finally broke free of those chains, with a new version that requires at least KitKat. Older models and even some major devices with KitKat (e.g. Nexus 7, S3, Note 3) are not able to use it.
You mean 2014. As noted above, the Google Wallet version that recently accounted for 4% of digital dollars, is less than eight months old and only runs on later gear / OSes.
So from a very simplistic view, something that's been out for 8 months is being used to spend 4x as many dollars as something that's been out 2 months. Which makes raw sense.
Question for those who've used Apple Pay already: do vendors ask for any type of proof of ID like they do, sometimes, when you use your standard credit card?
Pay. It's probably a no-brainer to assert that as more
Pay enabled hardware reaches the market and more NFC terminals are deployed that Apple's % will grow. Likewise, those who still don't want to use it -- and there's a few of you in this thread -- will probably come around once the store and online acceptance grows, and once the system is more understood. It really is a convenient, secure and free to use (once you have your device) form of payment that should not be ignored.Is Whole Foods a west coast chain? I've never heard of them once before Apple Pay was announced. It sounds like a cheap, discount supermarket but from the comments I'm reading it sounds like they're pricey.
I went to Macy's for some last minute shopping and literally saw all 4 cashiers at my checkout point guiding lines 5 people deep on using apple pay.