You can hardly copy using standards. That's why they're standards. NFC payment is a concept. I don't know if Google was the first to use the idea. Do you really need me to explain how NFC payments work?
So a special Apple USB is now different if it has a fingerprint sensor on it? Seriously, it's all NFC payments. Just like all USB drives are just that, USB drives. Also, like I explained, Google had tokenization already. The difference comes between a digital token and the type kept in the secure unit such as with AP. Seriously, though, there's nothing special about NFC payments. Apple just has more clout.
I know more about how NFC works than you ever will. Again, as I explained earlier, it's a transport layer, so everyone can use it. But you have to stop pretending that once NFC us used, everything else is just details. That's what's getting me ticked off here. You're trying to minimize the most important aspects to all of this. If it were just NFC that mattered, then everyone could do it easily, and would have already done so.
NFC was around long before Google decided to use it. It evolved from the old RDIF standard. In the early 2000's Nokia tried to push its own NFC payments system, but it failed. Even before that, other companies in the mid to late '90's tried it.
When Google came out with Google Wallet in 2011, it had a lot of problems. You could use it with some credit cards, but not really. You had to preload cash into the Wallet from them. Several months after it came out MasterCard had a deal with, I think it was, Citibank. So if you harped a Citibank account, and a Citibank MasterCard, you could use that as a debit card, at first, and later on, as a credit card.
That actually how this started. I don't remember all the details, I would have to look them up.
You really are stubborn. Can you be that ignorant about all of this?