How do you find out if a store has gone with ApplePay or with MCX? I am only curious because of how this will effect my grocery shopping.
The logos are different, for one.
How do you find out if a store has gone with ApplePay or with MCX? I am only curious because of how this will effect my grocery shopping.
credit card means "you buy stuff u cant actually afford" to us and also the german word for debt is the same word as guilt so we hesitate more to use one i guess.
my mother for example used to hide her credit card in the basement, inside some boxes and kept between blankets LOL its like the "last resort" when no other options are available. i only use mine on vacation but also hide it as good as i can
Also, the cut Apple takes on the paiement means it will have the same problem as credit/debit card in Germany or Switzerland: shops won't like to use it. For instance, I have a friend who bought a sport card in Switzerland, the dealer drove him all the way to the bank to make the transaction in cash rather than accept any other kind of paiement...
Please update your roundup to appropriately recognise the fact that this service, like many other initial service offerings from Apple, is only going to be available in the US and nowhere else. In none of their public releases/statements have they even said they have any intention to take it international. The only inkling of this is Tim Cook briefly indicating that they would like to try to take it else where if they can.
I find it pretty disappointing that they didn't have the foresight to think that if they made this global, it would make them the leader in NFC payments almost overnight. In terms of global NFC payments, the US is years behind everyone else - the majority of other countries have almost ubiquitous NFC enabled POS terminals, I know this to be true at home in Australia. There's not even an indication if US users will be able to use the service while overseas. This could have all been negated by simply forgetting about the banks and dealing only with credit/debit card companies - they are global companies and acting as a payment processor for them would have enabled them to take it international. But that would have meant they needed to pay MasterCard and Visa a fee, rather than the other way round and apparently the bean counters won out over whoever argued that a global service would enable even greater worldwide iPhone 6 and Apple Watch sales.
And how do you know that Apple is not trying to launch Apple pay in Europe or Japan?
The truth is that Apple need to launch Apple pay in countries that Iphone has very high penetration rate to make a difference. The merchants and card processing companies has to sign up for the payment method.
Man, that is a lot speculation with none of the fact to back it up. Visa's Chief risk officer was on Bloomberg West a couple days after Apple announced Apple pay. The money that Apple receive will come from the credit card processing companies (BAC, JPM etc. who issue the cards). And they earned it because the transaction is deems to be more secure than any other alternative. The economic for Visa does not change.
And how do you know that Apple is not trying to launch Apple pay in Europe or Japan? The truth is that Apple need to launch Apple pay in countries that Iphone has very high penetration rate to make a difference. The merchants and card processing companies has to sign up for the payment method. And if Apple does not have a dominating Iphone position, why would they bother? Look for Japan to be the second country if Apple pay is successful in US. Iphone in Japan has a higher market share than Iphone in US.. Outside of US, Japan, Germany, UK, may be France, there won't be many other places for Apple pay anywhere else. Each countries has their own credit card law and it will affect whether Apple pay make sense or not.
Yep, as I mentioned a couple of weeks ago in this post, Visa is working to get Apple Pay in Europe.
The card processors have to support the latest MC/Visa tokenized messages that Apple is using. And the banks probably have to agree to pay Apple.
Merchants shouldn't have to sign up for Apple Pay. It's just a standard EMV transaction to their terminals.
View attachment 498473
View attachment 498474
Ummmmm...
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-pay-to-invade-china-with-help-from-unionpay-2014-09-11
Not only markets that apple has a strong standing in but also those where apple has a well defined growth strategy. Apple Pay and the partnerships that enable it to be useful for a wide variety of things will eventually add value to apple's products (Current and Future iPhones and Apple Watch) and therefore be a service that would help these products add to their marketshare. With Apple Pay, it appears that apple is looking at the long term. Touch ID is only a year old, Touch ID with NFC on a phone is brand new @ apple..This will obviously change in the coming years when the number of such devices say in China will be in the tens of millions. And if the Apple Watch catches on in China you have the entire iPhone 5/5s/5c user base enabled for Apple pay..
The reason China (and Japan) makes a lot of sense is the density of the population @ the major cities which would be very conducive for retailers to upgrade and prepare for NFC payments (if they aren't already since I have only been to China a couple of times and did not notice NFC).
One thing I would like to see from Apple or third party developers is some sort of transaction record (like recording payment receipts) that enabled me to scroll through my purchases and how much time I have to return stuff etc.
I think the companies have to agree to use Apple Pay, otherwise why advertise specific companies and why did Best Buy and Walmart say they were supporting a different NFC "style". Seems like the company had to agree to use it.
Now, US counterfeit card-present fraud amounts were running about about 0.09% of purchases in 2012, so 0.15% seems high unless it's really risen since then.
That would apply only to some online shops. I don't think physical shops keep credit cards numbers.
For merchant, the most important aspect of Apple pay is the "card presented" rate that they received from the card processing company like JPM, WFC etc.
I think the actual security problem that Apple Pay helps with is a crooked merchant or crooked employee of a merchant who copies your card details, which are then later used in online card fraud. Every time you use Apple Pay, there is no chance to copy your card details, so online card fraud should go down.
Honest ones don't. But fraudsters do. You hand over your card in a restaurant, someone takes it and writes down the details before returning it to you.
Come on Apple, if you can get the grocery store chains and gas stations on board with this, it will become the standard! I have this fear that Walmart will win with their standard, sigh.
Of course, using any contactless payment method avoids letting the employees see your card. So does swiping my own card.
The protection of using tokens is more for the case where someone has installed a physical or software card skimmer at the POS terminal or has hacked into the merchant's main computers.
That situation won't change in the US until every restaurant has handheld payment terminals.
Doesn't matter because it doesn't take into consideration ---> (hacked company computers)
....which seems to happen all the time now. In the last 12 months I have my debit card compromised and replaced twice by two major retailers have their payment data hacked. This is a growing trend, and only a service like ApplePay has the potential to render it a non-issue.
No, its called Open Table. All the restaurant has to do is sign up to participate, ...
I think the actual security problem that Apple Pay helps with is a crooked merchant or crooked employee of a merchant who copies your card details, which are then later used in online card fraud. Every time you use Apple Pay, there is no chance to copy your card details, so online card fraud should go down.
Merchants like Home Depot could've also registered with the same token providers that the CC companies use, had them store the real numbers, and only store the tokens themselves. But they didn't.
In any case, that's why MC/Visa have taken it into their own hands, and created their tokenization programs which Apple is among the first to use. (I believe a bank in Canada was the first.)
Not a widespread solution, nor a desirable one for many restaurants.
Once all the old cc are gone and the new ones distributed, it won't matter what method you use they will all be secure. It's just that some places will use nfc and some won't but security will be basically the same.
They will change though. Banks are shifting the fraud burden to retailers. That is, the onus will be on the retailers to prevent credit card fraud or they will be financially responsible. So expect retailers to double-down on stopping credit card fraud, which NFC will do. And my personal experience, whenever there is credit card fraud, it occurs at gas stations or Walmart.
Thanks to HomeDepot I am yet again being shipped a new card from my bank. I'm sick of this crap, and I'm going to stop shopping at places that don't take my security as seriously as Apple clearly does.
...two cards here. Biz & personal. I also got hit by the Target break-in. I'm really tempted to get an iPhone 6 (despite its horrible size) for Apple Pay. I just wish they would open NFC up to non-financial applications...
This is quite a stretch to think that Apple Pay can be extended to China in the near future. Apple has only a 6-7% market share smartphone market. And China is a hybrid country in term of subsidy. All major carriers in China offers subsidy but there are plenty of user prefer to buy their phone. The upgrade cycle in China is much slower than a subsidy country like US or Japan. That means in about 12 months, Iphone 6 and 6+ would be lucky to have 2-3% of smartphone market share in China. Aside from the problem of Chinese government not trusting foreign firm for payment system, why would anyone really want to adapt their payment to Apple pay?
And the most important aspect of the discussion is the fraud protection part of the deal. In US and western country, there is a very strong consumer protection provision in our laws and credit card companies and banks which issue the card are on the hook for the loss due to fruad. In China and a lot of developing countries, there is no such protection provision. Customers are on the hook if someone stole their credit card number and make illegal purchase. There is not much incentive for CC companies to do anything beyond the take the report and issue a new card when a customer report the stolen CC card.
So, if there's an apple pay theft issue, and the thief managed to pay for something. Who would cover the lost? Apple? or my credit card bank?
I`ve made quick scheme how we could make shopping in future![]()
Pick your stuff in store, scan it, authorize payment and leave the store
Image
So, if there's an apple pay theft issue, and the thief managed to pay for something. Who would cover the loss? Apple? or my credit card bank?
HowApple Stores already support this. Have used for camera connection kit and cases.