Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm so confused… Surely royalties were being paid all along? You can't just acquire music without paying royalties, right? What is happening?
Music licensing has so many weird layers of lawyers and agents and middlemen. From what I've read most artists only really make money when they go on tour and sell tickets and merch. Pretty sad.
 
I prefer Spotify over Apple music. No matter how many times I told AM not to play certain genres, it kept curating play lists and sneaking those types of songs in.
is there a genre exclusion? I have never found it. where is it? I have been disliking songs one by one. No more country or rap, or their evil stepchild crap! Seriously, there isn't one, I see many artists ruin a beautiful song by putting some bonehead in it with a bunch of rap lines, why? so many of the others blend between genres, when is it alternative, folk, or just plain country? A lot of genre bending
 
  • Like
Reactions: The1andOnly
Pretty sure there aren’t millions of artists on Apple Music. Takes me less time to scroll through the list than it does to scroll Facebook‘s privacy label.
millions might be a stretch, but they do have a bigger library than Spotify, yet you can find exclusive in both, weird something to do with licensing
 
"$163,338,890 million" That is a lot of millions!

I'm pretty sure the word "million" is redundant after the number. I say this because for a moment I was very confused at how much they paid not to grammar-shame. I referred back to the headline for clarity.
they must have corrected it, that is not what it says
 
Confused.

Is this the total amount of royalties all streaming services have paid since a certain point of time?

Or is it some sort of one off payment in relation to a dispute in addition to the existing royalty payments?

If it’s the former then I can’t believe the figures are so small. Apple total contribution is about on par with the production budget of a single high budget movie.
 
Artists can thank Taylor Swift for writing that open letter to Apple in 2015 about her urgency on Apple Music’s fair artist compensation.
 
I am surprised how small the royalty payments this time around.

As for someone who dreams about picture royalty payments, maybe it will happen if browsing a foreign website requires user to apply for a visa.
 
When an artists gets a DIRECT payment from CUSTOMER TO ARTIST of e.g. $ 100 after processing fees and taxes she can be lucky to net $ 60 or $ 70. For these umbrella deals with the big managers and houses and management fees and what not I guess that crumbles down to merely a few dollars after taxes, even for the biggest musicians.
We customers are getting screwed over too. When I send money to an artist I want my hard earned cash to go to the artist, not to some ultra-rich man-in-the-middle attackers.
You’re rambling here. Yes, just like when a brewery in the US sells direct to its customers, does it recognize the
small margins. I can see your point about the middle-“man” (not an attack fyi) making money and the margins shrinking in that model where they exist. How are consumers in either case getting screwed? This is streaming...you pay a monthly fee for a service provided. You choose which one you want to pay for based on many factors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The1andOnly
Seven years or the death of creator, whichever is shorter. Ridiculous that much was paid.
 
That’s surprising. Why on earth would the recording industry not demand the higher rate from everyone?

Because Spotify isn’t making a profit, so maybe there’s a limit to hope much they can try to squeeze out of companies who are propping up said service with money from elsewhere?
 
That’s surprising. Why on earth would the recording industry not demand the higher rate from everyone?
Because when they did, people just used torrents to get music and everyone got paid a nice round f*ckall.

I sell digital goods myself - piracy is a strong argument to keep my prices as low as possible, because there isn't much I can do otherwise. Normal supply/demand mechanism breaks down once your work can be copied for free.
 
Last edited:
163m given how many users are on Apple Music, podcasts or whatever content is being consumed on apple seems ridiculously low.

artists truly getting screwed everyday by these tech companies,.

This payment is for unmatched royalties, that is why it is so low. Apple, Spotify, doesnt know who the proper rights holder for these payouts, so the money is given to this licensing association to try to find the rights holder.
 
This payment is for unmatched royalties, that is why it is so low. Apple, Spotify, doesnt know who the proper rights holder for these payouts, so the money is given to this licensing association to try to find the rights holder.
Thank you! I was suffering a mental block regarding what “unmatched royalties” means.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.