I don’t see the point of a touchscreen on a Mac. I used touchscreen Windows laptops for years, pretty much from the dime they were first introduced with Windows 8 up until just a couple of years ago when I got my first Mac.
Windows 8 introduced a brand new tile-based UI to make it more touch friendly, and even so I rarely found myself using the touchscreen.
All I want is a macbook Air with 120hz. I will pay for it. I dont care about the price. I just want a super small and thin and light with a M series chip and 120hz. Why cant Apple give it to me.
[...]
Gurman revealed the information in his latest "Power On" newsletter. While Apple has been widely expected to launch new M6-series MacBook Pro models with OLED displays, touchscreen functionality, and a new, thinner design in the fourth quarter of 2026 for some time, Gurman today turned that rumor on its head with the suggestion that this is an all-new kind of MacBook rather than a MacBook Pro.
Instead of succeeding the newly announced M5 Pro and M5 Max MacBook Pros, the "MacBook Ultra" will be a new, top-tier Apple laptop. Gurman added that the device is likely to sit above the current M5 MacBook Pros, rather than replace them, suggesting that they will remain on sale.
This would enable a markedly higher price point for the new machines. Gurman noted that when Apple brought OLED displays to the iPhone X in 2017 and the iPad Pro in 2024, it simultaneously raised price by around 20%. As a result, Gurman believes a similar price increase on account of the MacBook's first ever OLED display may be likely and help move the MacBook Pro further upmarket.
[...]
I wouldn't hold my breath. According to the link below (admittedly a couple of years old), Apple makes 8% of their revenue on Mac hardware and 22% on services, which includes Apple TV+ (again, it's a couple of years old). It doesn't break it down per service though, but it makes sense, right? You buy a Mac once every few years, but you pay for services every month.Apple’s reason is to market it to get more money, but user wise, what’s the benefit? Maybe drop this TV Show business and get back to focusing on hardware for user benefit.
Oh, I don’t see them doing so, just suggesting it is all.I wouldn't hold my breath. According to the link below (admittedly a couple of years old), Apple makes 8% of their revenue on Mac hardware and 22% on services, which includes Apple TV+ (again, it's a couple of years old). It doesn't break it down per service though, but it makes sense, right? You buy a Mac once every few years, but you pay for services every month.
![]()
Everything Owned by Apple
Apple Inc. has long been renowned for its innovation and cutting-edge contributions to technology. In the fifty years since its founding, Apple has gone from an obscure niche brand to one of the most well-known companies in the world. Throughout its history, Apple has acquired over 100...thechartistry.com
Timmy continuing to fragment any lineup he can. As long as they don't make the Pro line worse, it's fine.
This isn't fragmentation, this is "consumer choice".
More choices and more price points are a good thing.
All I want is a macbook Air with 120hz. I will pay for it. I dont care about the price. I just want a super small and thin and light with a M series chip and 120hz. Why cant Apple give it to me.
Professional still cameras (Canon, Sony) have been moving to CFexpress Type B for a while.will the ULTRA forgo the SD card slot because FUTURE ?
I just hope Apple still has the software chops to do it right and not repeat the mistakes of Windows 8.I think it goes without saying that if there is a touchscreen Mac then MacOS 27 has been adjusted to be touch-compatible.
So, despite MacRumors publishing at least three articles to the contrary by Juli Clover, this might not be such a bad time to buy a new MacBook Pro after all.
The MBP never had an Ultra chip.Soooo…. (Breathe in)
MacBook Pro has M5 Pro or Max chip, and used to have M3 Ultra but that’s too old now
The Mini will be updated to the M5 and M5-Pro, and the Studio will be upgraded to the M5-Max only since it is more powerful that the M3-Ultra. Then when the next Ultra chip is available, they will stick that in the Studio.Mac Studio has M4 Max or M3 Ultra chip, because apparently they are not too old for power users
Mac Mini has M4 or M4 Pro, because why update the Mini, right?
Apple doesnt really care about the MacPro, so it will probably be discontinued.Mac Pro has M2 Ultra because that’s just a zombie at this point (actually discontinued where so live)
Based on your logic of both being called Ultra, then the Apple Watch shoudl also get the Ultra chip. Just look at the size and weight of the Ultra’s heat sink in the Studio compared to the Max if you still think they are going to cram an Ultra chip in a MBP; its only a good idea if you're nostalgic for the days of 5 hour battery life.Sooo… I assume that MacBook Ultra will come with at least an option for an Ultra chip? Which then also goes into Studio.
You have never been able to get a MBP with an Ultra chip. No one knows it its a new computer line, or just a MBP option like nano-coating. If its a new computer it will probably have the same chips as the MBP.Will you be able to get a Pro with an Ultra chip, or an Ultra with a Pro chip? Who knows…
People overthink things, its not that confusing.This naming scheme of using Pro and Ultra both for chips and for Macs is getting increasingly ridiculous…
iPhone X all over again. A way to charge more money.That would actually be a good compromise. Keep the MacBook Pros the way they are and introduce this as a MacBook Ultra. And it will make it easier to make it disappear again when Apple realizes that nobody needs OLED, a touchscreen or a thinner and lighter design.