The thought of smudging up a beautiful OLED display with a touchscreen is just insane to me
Excellent, introduce new shittified devices at a higher price point and keep the MBP the same. Sounds great to me!
At least the Neo fills a hole in the market. Where do you position an Ultra (or whatever stupid unoriginal name they come up with)?
This is just what the MBA should have become after the M1 generation, ultraportable, options like nano-texture display, minimal bezels. But Cook refused to do that as long as he had to conform to the magic $1000 threshold.
Jobs’ Apple used to lead the way, skate to the where the puck is going to be. How times have changed.
I don’t think anyone has had that issue. Mostly praise for the design from what I’ve seen.I can already hear the scrape of metal on metal.
Very similar marketing to ditching the home button with iPhone X but keeping the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus around. iPhone X came in one size and honestly (for me) it was the year to skip the upgrade. But it is a way to introduce a new design shift without sabotaging your main stream high-end products.This sounds like an iPhone X redux.
You need to study up on what "fragment any lineup" means. Adding well-defined, well-placed products is solid good business practice.Timmy continuing to fragment any lineup he can. As long as they don't make the Pro line worse, it's fine.
I like that. “MacBook Studio” sounds great for a touch enabled machine with pencil support. Maybe one day.I could see them much rather calling it "MacBook Pro Studio" or just "MacBook Studio" instead of the Ultra moniker.
Judging by the reportedly slow sales of the iPad Pro, I doubt they'll launch an iPad Ultra. Nobody wants that-- but Apple is probably aware that people want a touch device that runs macOS, so it makes far more sense to launch a new MacBook with touch capability and price it above a MacBook. If the entry point is at least $2499, then they've sold a MacBook Pro and half an iPad and Tim Cook will be happy 😉Since Apple Silicon, have they released a new generation ONLY in the high end products first? The answer is no. With every new generation of Apple Silicon, while MacBook Pro’s may have been introduced, it’s always been alongside an iPad Pro, an iMac or a MacBook Air. The only time a M series chip was released ONLY in a Pro product was the iPad Pro with M4.
That analysis was via an idle thought and a google search and is likely more based on reality anything out of Gurman. 😉 Mainly because I don’t get paid from you paying attention to me!
Just from that, if anything is coming and will be introduced by itself, it’s far more likely to be an iPad Ultra than anything running macOS.
More like this, given how hot the photocopiers have been running…
View attachment 2611283
They're not going to do that-- a MacBook Ultra with touch and OLED will give them the profit margin to make it worth it. An iPad Pro with macOS is not going to do that.this is fine as long as they also make ipad w/ mac os.. and more like surface book 3(discontinued)..
Exactly.Putting the 14” M4 Pro at 2199 and the 16” base at 2699 would make it easy for 14” MacBook Ultra at $2499 and 16” MacBook Ultra at $2999 to start.
Since I began using iPad Pros with the Magic Keyboard I constantly find myself reaching to touch the screen of my MBP when using that machine. A touch OLED display makes a lot of sense to me. Not because I'll use it all the time, but because I'll have the option; and the experience across devices will be much more seamless.I don’t see the point of a touchscreen on a Mac. I used touchscreen Windows laptops for years, pretty much from the dime they were first introduced with Windows 8 up until just a couple of years ago when I got my first Mac.
Windows 8 introduced a brand new tile-based UI to make it more touch friendly, and even so I rarely found myself using the touchscreen.
Yeah.. they seem to contradict themselves if this is going to go down. Gurman often wrong though.. god knows why he still has a job as an analyst 😂iPadPro running macOS:
Touch doesn't work on macOS. It can't work. It wasn't designed for that. Nobody wants that!
Macbook, running macOS, with a Touchscreen:
Bringing our world class Multitouch experience, that everyone loves, to macOS!
More expensive than a MBP? Some MBP models are topping out over $4k. Who’s buying $5-6k laptop as a consumer? Absurd.
A handful of people on a tech forum complaining bitterly about touch screens doesn't tell us anything about whether or not the market wants a touch-enabled Mac. If Apple decides to release one, I'll trust the internal research of one of the most successful companies in history over forum dwellers griping about features they don't want.Exactly!!
So why is Apple bringing out touch screen for laptop? Is Apple planning on putting iPadOS on it or bringing out new OS?
Hope they are not going to introduce a new cable/port standard again.Starting with 4,999
• A new top laptop does not need to be the most powerful desktop replacement laptop Apple offers. The existing MBPs can continue to fill the Studio-power-but-still-portable role.I have to imagine that something like this would need insane cooling. Does the laptop form factor allow for this? I was given a work laptop that had an i9 processor in it and it's awful to use with how loud it is. Even worse that the fan is constantly spinning up and down.