they should make a reno 911 episode with apple
One of the best shows ever made!
they should make a reno 911 episode with apple
Considering the name given to this project, I begin to wonder if it doesn't include a manufacturing/assembly plant.
You aren't serious are you? Cooling costs? It's only hot in Reno three months out of the year, and the temperatures fall into the 50s and 60s at night. Fall and Spring are mild, and winter isn't all too serious. Aside from that....cooling costs pale in comparison to other cost advantages. Real estate in Reno is dirt cheap since the bust. Taxes in Nevada are incredibly low, there is a large and inexpensive labor force that currently suffers from a high rate of unemployment (see supply/demand). Those factors outweigh cooling costs by light years. Operating in Newark, CA is far more expensive due to those factors.
Some of the comments on this thread are unbelievably dim witted.
Contrary to what your snarky tag suggests.....no, you're not always correct. In fact, this time, you're just....simple.
How much do you wanna bet they choose Georgia or Ukraine?This is good news for the whole iCloud front. They really do need one in Europe though.
hopefully the end result sparks reno up a bit
never been, but from the comments I can imagine
How is Newark California near the companies headquarters?
Why build a data center in such a hot place though? Wouldn't you end up using more power to keep the building cool?
I guess there's less chances of natural disasters there though, no hurricanes or tornadoes to worry about.
Lots of sunshine for solar panels which can also shade the building from the sun. Also sandstorms to etch the glass on solar panels to greatly reduce efficiency.
Reno reminds me of Tatooine. Nevada will be a good tax shelter compared to California and in addition to the sun it also gets very windy there.
That looks so cool. where is that? (It's not Nevada)
Apple's taxes are also in the twenties percentage wise. Financial reports from each quarter publishes the estimated tax rate pretty clearly and none of them are anywhere near 9%. The idiots at NYT effectively compared Apple's revenue in 2012 with its taxes for the previous year. As Apple's profits were growing rapidly, that changed the percentage substantially. There is a Forbes article describing it in more detail, but it is a bit late at night for me to find the exact link now.According to The New York Times, Apple paid just $8.3 billion in taxes worldwide in 2011, which equates to a 9% tax rate. Walmart (NYSE:WMT), in comparison, pays a 24% tax rate.
Why build a data center in such a hot place though? Wouldn't you end up using more power to keep the building cool?
Apple doesn't want to pay taxes? STOP THE PRESSES!Found this interesting article at IP
Why build a data center in such a hot place though? Wouldn't you end up using more power to keep the building cool?
I guess there's less chances of natural disasters there though, no hurricanes or tornadoes to worry about.