Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My question is, What does it mean "contribute $350 billion to the US economy"? Does it mean that Apple will build manufacturing facilities here or does it mean that Apple will finally start buying serious tech companies in the US?

Create 20,000 jobs sure sounds to me like bringing manufacturing back to the US unless they are going to be focusing on designing new emojis.

They are bringing manufacturing to the US, hence contributing to the manufacturing fund.
 
I think you mean thanks Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell and the rest of Republicans in Congress. Trump didn’t do squat.

It's not completely fair to say Pres. Trump didn't do anything but you are otherwise correct. Congress did most of it but it took a supportive president for it to pass. It's like back in the 90s. Pres. Clinton gets credited with a lot of of good economy and eliminating the deficit (for a time) when it was mostly Congress who was responsible. Pres. Clinton had his input and did a good job working with Congress but people should remember that Congress makes and passes laws. They are in charge of tax policy. Presidents can be more or less influential in the process.
 
This wouldn't have happened 2 years ago, let alone under any liberal run government. So much is happening from Trump's tax bill.

This would have happened 2 years ago, and has nothing to do with the tax bill.

Wasn't it a few years ago that Apple invested massive amounts of money in that failed sapphire plant in Arizona? They make a lot of investments, including in the US, such as the $5 billion HQ.

And the numbers they're talking about here are pretty small. Only 20,000 additional employees and $5 billion fund for the US? Their foreign manufacturers have 500,000 employees in a plant. It's sounds more like an expanded R&D center than a manufacturing center.

If you want to thank someone, thank Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and all other Apple's competitors for forcing Apple to invest in R&D to compete against them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dems are liars, who now want to hold the legal citizens own government hostage and shut it down, if we don't grant permission to those that have already broken the law to get here and live here illegally. yes, you read that right! Dems are holding the legal citizens government hostage over an illegally passed bill that helps illegal people that have gotten here illegally. SAD!

What's sad is that you blindly follow people who care only about lining their own pockets at your expense, probably because they happen to also pass laws that serve to further racist, hateful, and discriminatory agendas that you support.
 
Investment in people is the most important part, as emphasized by Tim Cook last month.

Apple CEO Tim Cook: This Is the Number 1 Reason We Make iPhones in China (It's Not What You Think)

"There's a confusion about China. The popular conception is that companies come to China because of low labor cost. I'm not sure what part of China they go to but the truth is China stopped being the low labor cost country many years ago. And that is not the reason to come to China from a supply point of view. The reason is because of the skill, and the quantity of skill in one location and the type of skill it is."

"China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they're a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously it's the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people."

"The number one reason why we like to be in China is the people. China has extraordinary skills. And the part that's the most unknown is there's almost 2 million application developers in China that write apps for the iOS App Store. These are some of the most innovative mobile apps in the world, and the entrepreneurs that run them are some of the most inspiring and entrepreneurial in the world. Those are sold not only here but exported around the world."
 
Great. Impressive. Deservedly.

Can we just disconnect Apple’s success from politics?

Jobs returned under Clinton. iPod and iTunes launched and met with success under Bush. iPhone launched under Bush and had tremendous success under Obama. Apple’s worldwide expansion confirmed under Obama and domination continuing under Trump.


Difference is, out of everything you have mentioned, only under Trump has Apple started to make massive commitments to the United States economy.
 
My question is, What does it mean "contribute $350 billion to the US economy"? Does it mean that Apple will build manufacturing facilities here or does it mean that Apple will finally start buying serious tech companies in the US?

Create 20,000 jobs sure sounds to me like bringing manufacturing back to the US unless these 20,000 people will be hired to design new emojis.
Who know where they come up with these figures. Just like when they say they’ve created x million jobs and it’s a very liberal interpretation like including FedEx drivers who deliver iPhones to people’s homes. My guess is a lot of the $350B will be prepayments to suppliers. The 20K sounds like direct Apple employees so I doubt it will be manufacturing. Probably a lot of data centers and tech support. Or maybe some of it is related to wherever project titan goes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iCat
Apple could already hold bond sales that were basically free money for them due to the rock bottom interest rates vs. the return on the bonds. The tax repatriation isn't really that important for Apple's plans or to the U.S. economy. I think you're going to see a lot of posturing like this in the corporate world in the coming year because they know they didn't really need the "help". Corporate profits were already at record highs in 2016 and corporate taxes relative to GDP were already at record lows in 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
Sooooo......the fact they already declared yet another round of stock buybacks financed by bonds makes you wonder where the rest of that illegal tax haven money is going to go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ani4ani
It's not completely fair to say Pres. Trump didn't do anything but you are otherwise correct. Congress did most of it but it took a supportive president for it to pass. It's like back in the 90s. Pres. Clinton gets credited with a lot of of good economy and eliminating the deficit (for a time) when it was mostly Congress who was responsible. Pres. Clinton had his input and did a good job working with Congress but people should remember that Congress makes and passes laws. They are in charge of tax policy. Presidents can be more or less influential in the process.
I take issue with the kool-aid drinkers who show up and say “thank you Lord Trump” as if it happened only because of him. No, it happened because taxes are about the only thing Republicans can agree on and they control all branches of government right now.
 
They should split the role of the U.S. President. One for running the business side and another for public speaking and policy presentations and photo opportunities for the liberal people to make them feel good. The U.S. never had a president that can do both things.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jase1125 and Jakuta
This is a direct result of the tax reform Republicans in Congress passed. While he will get credit, it really isn't Pres. Trump's doing. He certainly had influence in the process though and should be commended for that.

I'm not a Republican and am no fan of the current president but I always give credit where it's due.
Yeah, I'd like to see many of the president's policies fail, but this is actually one that could end up benefiting the economy and country. If it actually works, then props to them. It might be why it was the only thing they could pass last year—it was an actual semi-decent idea! Far from perfect, but something. I still worry that it may only make the rich richer while leaving many others behind, but we'll see.
 
Apple could already hold bond sales that were basically free money for them due to the rock bottom interest rates vs. the return on the bonds. The tax repatriation isn't really that important for Apple's plans or to the U.S. economy. I think you're going to see a lot of posturing like this in the corporate world in the coming year because they know they didn't really need the "help". Corporate profits were already at record highs in 2016 and corporate taxes relative to GDP were already at record lows in 2016.
No it’s a big deal. The tax bill on the repatriated income is just about what Apple had reserved for, but about half of what it could have been. And in the future there is no more disincentive to repatriate income.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jakuta
No, they invested 500 million in 2013, which was to be repaid.

Today they are commiting to 350 BILLION, with no expectation to be directly repaid. Very very very different.

The $350 billion is the "contribution to the US economy".

That's not additional investment.

That's the sum of all the US economic activity over the next 5 years. That was ALREADY going to happen. If each year they make $70 billion in iPhone/Mac/etc. sales in the US, that's $350 billion over 5 years.

So, as usual, nothing has changed.
[doublepost=1516215281][/doublepost]
Doesn't take much common sense to see correlation.

Sounds like the MAGA crowd is trying as hard as they can they make up a correlation.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.