As much as I liked my xx, I certainly do not class it as a computer.
In due course those arguments will be irrelevant.
It's a moped. It's a different class. Most Vespa's can't even legally ride on the highway here.
To class them in with motorcycles is wrong, even our DMV doesn't for licenses and plates.
They are just a much a type of computer as a desktop, a laptop, a netbook are all types of computers. If a laptop can be bunched in with desktop, then why not tablets.
Smartphones I can understand not being lumped in with computers since their primary function is supposed to be a "phone". Something like the iPod Touch is tricky though.
We keep coming back to this issue. Who would have thought, only a few years ago, that we would be considering these things? It was barely (if at all) in our collective (consumer?) consciousness: A tablet as the next-gen platform for computing. In this era a device succeeds not just on quantity of features, but rather on what has been taken away, and the drive to perfect (almost obsessively) what remains. We're looking at the the Art of The Interface - not megahertz, clock speeds and soulless numbers - as the basis for success in this next phase of computing. Software. Which is a key element (if not the primary element) in creating a competitive User Experience. The hardware form factor has been reduced to absolute minimalism with as much power (and not a shred more) as that form factor will allow.
Canalys and DisplaySearch are already lumping the iPad in with conventional PC numbers. Who's next? It's only a matter of time before all tablets and "computers" (desktops, notebooks, dying/dead netbooks, the new wave of ultrabooks) are, in terms of shipments, unit sales and market share, indistinguishable on paper.
There's an interesting aspect to all this that's worth noting: It would appear that in terms of next-gen computing, the iPad is currently king. However, as we have seen with the iPod and its particular impact on the market, there really is no demand for tablets other than the iPad. Granted, this might change, but the competition's efforts suggest they're unable or uninterested in bringing their A-Game (if they even have one) to the table.
Does the next generation of general consumer computing belong almost solely to the iPad (with whatever the competition can churn out following far behind)? If so, that is an absolutely huge shift in terms of the industry at large, and especially if we consider what the consequences would be for the competition.
It's a computer if it computes, accesses data, and is programmable enough to be readily adapted to a very diverse set of applications. It's a personal computer if it's a computer and it's personal.
iPads fit.
It's a computer if it computes, accesses data, and is programmable enough to be readily adapted to a very diverse set of applications. It's a personal computer if it's a computer and it's personal.
iPads fit.
Laptops and desktops follow the same paradigm of computing and run the same software. Tablets mostly use a new input paradigm completely and require software to be rewritten (yes, even those Windows tablets that required Windows XP Tablet edition and a couple of tweaks to input for applications).
As such, I would not class tablets with laptops and desktops. They are a separate class. I would lump them in with Smartphones though.
And yes, Smartphones are computers too.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9A405)
Hint:
iPad =/= PC
/thread
And iPhones, iPod Touchs, any smartphone, etc.
Do we have to count them on the personal computer statistics?
"In Due Course" is a fortune cooking comment, LTD. How long is "in due course" ?
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9A405)
Hint:
iPad =/= PC
/thread
And iPhones, iPod Touchs, any smartphone, etc.
Do we have to count them on the personal computer statistics?
Once again it's the apple fanbois saying illogical things like the ipad should be considered a PC.
"In Due Course" is a fortune cooking comment, LTD. How long is "in due course" ?
1 year. 2 years? 20 years? It's "easy" to make predictions without any real value.
IE - It's only a matter of time before displays are nothing like what they are today.
Of course not! Technology rolls along.
In due course - maybe Google buys Apple. Maybe Apple buys Google. Maybe some other company that doesn't exist yet rises up and kills both off.
In due course.. of course..
No. They need a bigger screen.
A new generation containing an equal amount of closed-minded people?due course is when all the closed minded people die out and a new generation replaces them
Ah, because you say so, no?
Well, i say they need at least a 10" screen => iPad out of the equation.
No. They need a bigger screen.
A new generation containing an equal amount of closed-minded people?
No. They need a bigger screen.