When it's there and functioning properly I'll give Apple credit for implementing it.I was under the impression that Apple has built in the framework for XML, with hooks and all. The API is just about ready, and this close to launch, I'd consider that an ok effort actually .
Hopefully other options come out because paying $500 for a plugin for a $300 app to get what is considered a basic feature is ridiculous. That's $800 for FCP X when just a over a week ago someone could spend $1000 and get FCP 7, DVD SP, Cinema Tools, Motion, Compressor, Sound Track Pro and Color.I fully agree we have to be able to communicate with others. XML takes care of that. OMF/EDL does not have to be built directly in by Apple if they provide other options, and they also provide the options for others to provide the functionality.
Although I know what you are saying I don't think it's quite the same thing. Apple didn't add Flash support to it's iDevices which is different than Adobe limiting your ability to create things in Flash even though there are billions of people that want to watch Flash content. That is more in line w/what Apple is doing w/FCP X right now. There are also some alternatives to Flash but, to continue the analogy, right now there are some fairly core features that FCP X does not have and there is absolutely no way to work around them.Apple dropping Flash was a big bomb for everyone (especially for me as a graphic design doing work for web, much of it previously in Flash), but I appreciate what they did, and how they have actually changed the landscape to a large degree - in my opinion to the better by getting rid of a lot of unnecessary Flash. Not that it pertains to this exactly, just saying that these kinds of breaks can be more than an omission by Apple - they can be consciously trying to lead the way a bit. (While still leaving the "dirt-road of archaic standards" (yes, partly kidding.) open for those that still need it.)
I agree. And that's why lots of people that really utilize what the Final Cut Suite has to offer are heading over to Adobe or Avid. It's been a long time coming too. Many people weren't happy w/the anemic update in '09 and started weighing their options then. The release of FCP X just sealed the deal.In reality at the end of the day it's not what tool that you use but the finished product delivered on time in budget that matters, the software needs to do what it's ment to do and then get out of the way. Either Final Cut Pro X works and helps the "Profesional" get his job done or I'm sure they will find a way or use another program, it's not the software that is "Professional" it's the person using it.
Lethal