when the fact is, the overwhelming majority of the posters are advocates.
If you insist....
when the fact is, the overwhelming majority of the posters are advocates.
I think you're looking at this sideways and mixing technologies and applications.
NFC is a communications technology, just like BLE, mag strips, QR codes and the keyboard.
People seem to like it because it's longer range than a mag strip. That means you don't have to guide it into a slot to complete a transaction. That also means that it's subject to snooping.
If the NFC payload is nothing but an identifier, like a credit card number, it is easier to steal than it would be to swipe. You wouldn't even need physical control of the device, just an antenna. Is it a more complex transaction than this? I'm not sure how it could be on a passive plastic card, but a phone could get fancier. Maybe rols knows.
It's the usage model that doesn't put PINs on card transactions. Most of mine require either a PIN or zip code at unmanned terminals.
There's nothing about the mag strip that permits internet orders, we do it by manually typing the number into a keyboard. The same would be used with an NFC enabled token-- or if the token is your phone, then it could enter it into the transaction for you.
I think what crsh1976 was getting at though was the inherent conflict between ease of use and security. Swiping our cards is currently how we both keep the information transfer controlled, and signal the intent to transact. If we take that action away, how do we know which transactions are intended? The NFC systems I've seen to date signal intent by placing the token on a pad right next to the swipe slot-- essentially it's the same action with more silicon. Once the application constraints get looser than that, it starts to get risky.
In the end, I don't see how it's going to be all that different from card transactions, and I don't see how NFC specifically needs to be the solution.
----------
How is NFC secured?
Trying to make a payment system out of Bluetooth LE, which no merchant will support, is never going to get off the ground. Just look at how frequently Passbook is implemented correctly, and that's a far lower barrier to cross vs. new payment terminals which are already scheduled for a hardware refresh by late 2015.
I would not say it would never work. As far as merchant support, even an iPad could work as a POS terminal. Which more then likely they already have laying around.
What? Why would supermarkets, gas stations and fast food restaurants have iPads laying around?
If they do adopt any kind of wireless payment technology, I hope they let me turn it off
Most posters here may be sold on convenience, but I don't want to pay the bill for the person ahead of me at the supermarket by mistake...
A lot of those are independently owned. I'm sure quite a few owners already have iPads.
I'm not sure what your talking about, but it would most likely be through an iTunes account or the businesses application on the idevice. Depending on how Apple sets it up.
Perhaps, but your average supermarket here has at least 3-4 cash registers open at any given time, and the big hypermarkets have up to 30 cash registers. Gas stations have usually more than one register, as do fast food restaurants.
I seriously doubt that any business owner has a truckload of iPads just laying around somewhere unused so that they can be devoted to POS duties for 12-14 hours a day.
The thing is, that you will at any rate need to subscribe to a PCI service from one of the credit companies. And when you do that, you'll get one of their devices as well. So, if they don't want to implement iSomething, it doesn't get implemented. It's really that simple. And as far as I know, they are going for NFC.
And I can't recall ever having seen an iDevice used as a POS-system here in Finland, so I'd think that there isn't a huge interest to invest in that tech over here. Sure, it's a small market and probably bears little weight on a global scale, so should that catch on big, I'm sure that we would adapt.
Wow, sounds expensive. The credit card charges are already quite steep, at least for the "speciality cards" such as AmEx and Diner's. Apple probably wouldn't do this for goodwill, so that's another layer of skimming added on top still. I wonder when we will see pricing based on your method of payment.
Not even Apple Stores!......
Trying to make a payment system out of Bluetooth LE, which no merchant will support, is never going to get off the ground. Just look at how frequently Passbook is implemented correctly, and that's a far lower barrier to cross vs. new payment terminals which are already scheduled for a hardware refresh by late 2015.
Not even Apple Stores!
BLE does have proximity 'ranging' that determines distance from central to peripheral.
I am uncertain of the technical details on BLE vs NFC security implementations, the fruits of which could lead to a decisive winner.
citation neededTrying to make a payment system out of Bluetooth LE, which no merchant will support...
I have the Note 3. It has these features such as eye scan, hand gesture, etc. I really hate it. It doesn't even work that well. Like someone mentioned on here, it's outdated, clunky and annoying. Wish Samsung would get rid of all this stuff and stick to something we ALL use and try to work on those instead of these wannabe fancy features that just annoys the heck out of their customers!![]()
citation needed
Merchants wouldn't want to build a new ecosystem just for Apple users since it seems that payments with iBeacons would be restricted to just Apple users with iOS devices. On the other hand with NFC you'll get open standard that anyone can implement, even Apple if they want to. This actually doesn't even need a hardware support for NFC from the phone itself since it can be done with a NFC sticker and iOS/Android/WP application.
Also, pretty much every pin&chip payment terminal in EU already supports NFC (might not be enabled yet, but it can be via firmware update) and the same thing is going to happen in US too since pin&chip will be required for all new credit/debit cards and every non-compatible payment terminal will be replaced with a new one to support it. So NFC would be covered by that since those merchants are required to change their systems anyway if they want to continue accepting payments with credit/debit cards. Same thing cannot be said for iBeacons, nobody is forcing to support it.
Merchants wouldn't want to build a new ecosystem just for Apple users since it seems that payments with iBeacons would be restricted to just Apple users with iOS devices. On the other hand with NFC you'll get open standard that anyone can implement, even Apple if they want to. This actually doesn't even need a hardware support for NFC from the phone itself since it can be done with a NFC sticker and iOS/Android/WP application.
The same thing is going to happen in US too since pin&chip will be required for all new credit/debit cards and every non-compatible payment terminal will be replaced with a new one to support it. So NFC would be covered by that since those merchants are required to change their systems anyway if they want to continue accepting payments with credit/debit cards. Same thing cannot be said for iBeacons, nobody is forcing to support it.
a) chews up battery vs. NFC.
b) is an active, not passive process