I will need to see what the specs of an 11.6 MBA are, if such a computer actually appears. To me, the most important weakness of the current MBA is that it has only 2Gb of non expandable RAM. The current MBA also has heat problems and, some have reported that it struggles with some graphics. It sounds, though, as if an 11.6 inch version of the MBA would be even more underpowered than the current MBA. Thus, even if the 11.6 inch version comes with OS X, it's likely that I won't be interested in it.
I'm really still just hoping that they will also update the existing MBA. A new and smaller model could be nice for some users, but I'm more interested in an update to the existing model. The 13" screen is already as small as I could tolerate for any productive purposes.
The 13.3" macbook pro is NOT a replacement for the 12" powerbook. The MBP is almost TWO inches wider than the Powerbook, which drastically changes portability. If Apple hadn't discontinued the G4, I would have definitely gotten that over the MBP. I'm happy with my MBP 13.3", but as a home machine - I absolutely hate to travel with it and avoid carrying it around whenever possible.
I've been craving an updated Powerbook that is a pound lighter than before. An 11.6" MBA (or 12.1", the size of the full-keyboard powerbook) would be great! But Apple should hurry, because I'm fed up with the lack of a truly portable notebook, and am planning to buy a netbook very soon - a thin pretty aluminum one was just released. I would pay double for an 11.6" MBA, no questions asked, but am afraid the price will be more like triple.
I know lots of people who feel the same, who loved the Powerbook and want a better replacement than the wider 13.3" MBP or MBA. The size would make all the difference, especially for women like me who travel a lot and work on their computers daily. It's been disappointment after disappointment recently... please give us a Macbook Air Mini! (I hope that they continue the 13.3" MBA too.)
For the haters - the MBA currently keeps shipping 150K units per quarter. Eat it.![]()
The 13.3" macbook pro is NOT a replacement for the 12" powerbook. The MBP is almost TWO inches wider than the Powerbook, which drastically changes portability.....
2" wider, but thinner and the same weight, and this "drastically changes portability"?Wow. Just. Wow. The 13.3" @ 4.6 pounds is very portable given the power capability and capacity of the MBP 13. It's a blessing to travel with, compared to my MBP15, as well as the tank of a Dell Latitude I use to carry at a prior employer.
I was waiting for this reply, but polaris beat me to it.
I agree 110% The Macbook Air nor an 11.6" Air would ever, nor should ever be considered a 12" replacement. I know some will attempt to call it that having never really had a need for the 12" Powerbook at all.
Remember:
- Dedicated GFX or at the very least GFX that can handle 3D gaming (Sims 3/Civ4)
- OPTICAL DRIVE BUILT IN
- User replaceable RAM
- PORTs, at least 2 USB and 1 FW800 (twas' 400 long ago)
Basically, a fully functioning, stand alone computer for the true road warrior.
Yup. I've had the pleasure of using and working on a 12" PB (adding bigger drive, upgrading RAM) and it was a very capable, full-featured laptop in a small size. It was everything why I love my 13" MBP now. I take my 13 with me everywhere, because it IS so small and light.
The Air, on the otherhand, is so neutered that it's nearly useless running full OS X, at which point I'd sooner grab my iPad if I didn't feel like carrying my 13 or 15.
I have an iPad and like it less and less all the time. It's fine for listening to music and recorded books or watching video, such as Netflix streaming, but is crippled in most other ways. Although the MBA has its weaknesses, too, it at least can access Flash enabled sites, multitask, and use a broad variety of apps. In stark contrast, the iPad can use only those apps, which Apple deigns to make available for us at the App Store. The bottom line is that the MBA is a real computer but the iPad is not.The Air, on the otherhand, is so neutered that it's nearly useless running full OS X, at which point I'd sooner grab my iPad if I didn't feel like carrying my 13 or 15.
I have an iPad and like it less and less all the time. It's fine for listening to music and recorded books or watching video, such as Netflix streaming, but is crippled in most other ways. Although the MBA has its weaknesses, too, it at least can access Flash enabled sites, multitask, and use a broad variety of apps. In stark contrast, the iPad can use only those apps, which Apple deigns to make available for us at the App Store. The bottom line is that the MBA is a real computer but the iPad is not.
Yes, but the 12inch PowerBook wasn't widescreen!
I just don't understand why everyone wants widescreen. I do watch movies on my computer - but only for a small proportion of the time. Most of the time I'm reading the web (portrait orientation pages are best) or productivity stuff (portrait format is best for word processing) or photo editing (half my photos are portrait orientation).
Widescreen just cuts down the number of pixels for a given screen size and forces you to work in a small letter-box format. The smaller the screen you have, the more it sucks. Thank goodness Apple didn't use wide-screen on the iPad.
Originally Posted by Digital Skunk
I was waiting for this reply, but polaris beat me to it.
I agree 110% The Macbook Air nor an 11.6" Air would ever, nor should ever be considered a 12" replacement. I know some will attempt to call it that having never really had a need for the 12" Powerbook at all.
Remember:
- Dedicated GFX or at the very least GFX that can handle 3D gaming (Sims 3/Civ4)
- OPTICAL DRIVE BUILT IN
- User replaceable RAM
- PORTs, at least 2 USB and 1 FW800 (twas' 400 long ago)
Basically, a fully functioning, stand alone computer for the true road warrior.
Didn't Mr. Jobs say at the iPad event that netbooks were "good for nothing," so why would he allow Apple to release a product that even partially fell into the netbook category. On top of this, when the Air was released, Jobs made a huge deal about how great the full-size keyboard!
Perhaps because the iPad really doesn't fall into the category of a netbook.
The iPad exclusively utilizes a Multi-Touch interface, is exponentially more responsive with, and streamlined for, what it is designed to do, runs a memory efficient iOS, is in many ways more portable, more accessible, starts-up faster, sports a high-res screen, is extremely efficient in terms of battery life, and is blazingly fast.
It feels like most of the MBA "haters" in this thread haven't really used one. The 12" PB was my fav apple computer ever. But my MBA is a close second. I have used a 13" MBP as well, but I find little/no need for the optical drive many of you are crowing about.
Literallly the only thing wrong with my MBA RevB right now is that it only has 2gb of ram. I'm a mobile freelance professional, so the light weight, full OSX, full keyboard etc... All does it for me.
Plus I always get cool looks and questions about it in Starbucks.![]()
Well I agree with you in most respects, but even though the 12" PB had a dedicated gfx card it was the same gfx card you could get integrated on pc side. It was also clocked slower than even some integrated versions of it. The 9400m and 320m that is in the 13 inch mbp is more capable compared to its siblings than the 440mx and 5200 series in the PB 12" was compared to theirs.
The user-replaceable RAM I will give you. That is important. The optical drive I almost never use. Only to install some software I cant buy and download. Ports... yeah I will give you that one as well. We really need at least 2 USB-ports and a FW would be nice as well.