Ah but think about this... In my area, many of the large office buildings are sitting vacant with for sale / lease / rent -with option to sublet. What we have is smaller store-front offices just for a local presence. We are seeing a trend where the large I/T dept / corporate office is trickling away, and companies are moving to smaller buildings and remote employees, or just hiring contractors and outsourcing all together. Gone also are the days of companies paying for relocation in masse. They will either have you work from home, or if enough people in an area warrant, open a store front to sit 5-10 people. Relocation is really only becoming for mission-critical like hospitals. But with so many I/T people out of work - we are flooded with good talent just waiting to be hired locally.
Your partially right.
Thankfully Microsoft has a Remote Desktop solution
Seriously we have been doing a lot of work for companies just as you describe, especially in the medical industry where managing data is important. With Remote Desktop and Remote App, plus a little SharePoint we are able to secure data and serve apps to the end user regardless of the machine they are on which is a boon to those who contract and do not want hardware costs.
Apple's remote desktop solution, and there is no remote app solution, and I doubt there will be with the cancellation of XServe's will not complete at all in that arena.
Money drives IT.
Novell was king of the hill, even though at the time Microsoft's product was woefully inadequate in comparison. Novell however went cheap and all those CNE's making 100K a year suddenly found Novell trying to undercut them with 60K a year CNA program. AD people were making good money and products pushed towards Microsoft even though the product was inferior.
IT Consultants drive the market. I've put SharePoint based solutions in 10 companies in the past 12 months. Microsoft would not have done that, they rely on their partners to do it.
Remote Desktop/App/SharePoint are all highly profitable, but they are also incredibly valuable to a business looking to solve specific problems.
Tell me, why would I want to push an Apple product where I sell the support solution to someone else, make squat on the hardware, and have no development line?
Or would I work on the product line that gives around a 52 percent profit margin, creates value for the customer, and gives me a reliable stream of revenue as we continue to develop the system?
The hardware/software argument is useless. Windows 7 is rock solid, their server product is beyond rock solid. Hardware, at least what we sell, is solid, and the service contracts make up for any deficiency.
When Apple changes their product line around to make VAR's money then people will push their products.
I do push the iPad and iPhone, a lot. Why? Because when we do app dev I can throw on another chunk of money to optimize them for the device. I also think they are high value devices that solve a lot of business problems for a reasonable price.
The problem is Apple's other products do not. They may in a few verticals, and Apple already owns those markets, I'd never tell a customer to move from them if it works for them.
When Apple takes the partner approach and makes it profitable for VARs/Consultants to make money with their products then their influence will grow.
I've quoted against Apple support companies before and absolutely crush them in the value segment.
Usually their champion in the company can't come up with much more than "It's cool" or something similarly useless.
There is no money in supplying hardware. What you make 3-5 percent on each unit? The money is in the consulting and value end of it. I sell them the server, the hardware, and the setup. It's not bad money but when I throw on top a custom SharePoint solution at 100-120 hours at $150 an hour, that is where the money is. IF we do our job right it is a continuing revenue stream.
Apple has no product like that and what supplier is going to be happy with 5 percent plus labor?