Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
There's some layer of trust in everything right? You trust your car not to fall apart while you drive it, you trust your (insert computer used here) not to constantly take photos of you while you use it distributing it to everyone you know.

We have to trust that Apple is only comparing hashes to previously identified CP (child-****) images and sending those up for review. We have to.

If we don't agree to it, simple - turn iCloud photos off. End of story, right? (According to what I'm reading, turning off iCloud photos disables device photo scanning).
I trust Apple but I don't trust ANYONE when it comes to privacy. Trust me it can be used against you. It's deadly.
 
Neuenschwander continued that for users who are "not into this illegal behavior, Apple gain no additional knowledge about any user's cloud library," and "it leaves privacy completely undisturbed."
“Show me the man, and I’ll show you the crime.” – Lavrentiy Beria

Don't worry though, the best of intentions are behind this and only noble men/women will be overseeing everything, so nothing can go wrong.
 
You wouldn't be talking like that if Apple got hold of your wife pictures.

Dude, I'm trying to save you. Don't fall for it. Don't get yourself PLAYED.
How could Apple get hold of my wife pictures? The check happens client-side, no data leaves my device and photos in iCloud remain encrypted.

On the other hand, if you don’t trust them, they could have been watching your wife for 10 years. And you would have been none the wiser.
 
you mean the same vast majority of the public who posts every little detail of their life on Facebook and Instagram?
The vast majority of the public who looks UP everything they ever needed to know, from the mundane to the extremely personal, on Google search?
The vast majority of the public who does the majority of their communications with Facebook messenger, Twitter direct message and SMS?
do you know what Google, Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter all have in common? They’ve been doing this exact thing for years. The general public do not and will never care about this kind of stuff until it actually affects them, and at the moment it does not.
sure, in the hypothetical future when hypothetical governments get their hypothetical hands on this type of technology and hypothetically force tech companies into hypothetically adding all sorts of restrictions, then we can be worried. But as for the current time, 99.999% of people do not care.
they’re not gonna get a new phone because of this, they’re not gonna turn off iCloud because of this, they’re definitely not gonna give up any of their social media because of this. They just don’t care.
Thanks for summing up the problem and why it is so important for those that do care to be vigilant.
The "everyone else has been doing it for so long and you didn't care" excuse is tired and is a pathetic way to convince people to just give up.
 
How could Apple get hold of my wife pictures? The check happens client-side, no data leaves my device and photos in iCloud remain encrypted.
If no data leaves the device how will this help at all? Even if I have a picture from their database they would never know because no data leave the device.
 
Shorter “If your not breaking the law you have nothing to fear”.

I am sure am glad governments never change laws, have poorly defined laws, arbitrary enforcement, and executive orders/mandates etc that might change my status as a law abiding citizen at any moment.

Obviously this power could never be abused. Thank goodness. Go get those bad people with the pictures while the rest of us rest easy knowing they are not after us.
I'm sure that the CCP will mandate scanning Chinese iPhones for images of Tank Man, Winnie the Pooh and the Hong Kong protests before long. As for me - I won't update to IOS 15. When my apps stop working on 14, I'll get an Android.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 09872738
If no data leaves the device how will this help at all? Even if I have a picture from their database they would never know because no data leave the device.
Trying to be helpful --- this is what I'm seeing : (The image is uploaded then, yes - if positive identification to CSAM?)

1628617542206.png


Taken from: https://techcrunch.com/2021/08/10/i...abuse-detection-and-messages-safety-features/
 
There's some layer of trust in everything right? You trust your car not to fall apart while you drive it, you trust your (insert computer used here) not to constantly take photos of you while you use it distributing it to everyone you know.

We have to trust that Apple is only comparing hashes to previously identified CP (child-****) images and sending those up for review. We have to.

If we don't agree to it, simple - turn iCloud photos off. End of story, right? (According to what I'm reading, turning off iCloud photos disables device photo scanning).
“Just turn off icloud photos”. Thats like saying if you dont want to share appletag info turn off findmy

it sounds like a choice but apple is intentionally bundling features because they know you really cant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Philip_S
“Just turn off icloud photos”. Thats like saying if you dont want to share appletag info turn off findmy

it sounds like a choice but apple is intentionally bundling features because they know you really cant.
Also, when you buy an iPhone you pay for 5 GB of iCloud. So they are saying pay for it, but don't use it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Philip_S
“Just turn off icloud photos”. Thats like saying if you dont want to share appletag info turn off findmy

it sounds like a choice but apple is intentionally bundling features because they know you really cant.
Oh agreed.

I spent a LOT of effort years ago to move from Google Photos to iCloud Photos. I've been happily using iCloud photos for years - I've got:

1628617727469.png


And I'm so addicted to the convenience of taking a photo and it instantly being available on all my Apple devices - it would be inconceivable for me to turn it off. lol.
 
Why are they doubling down on this so hard? Who asked them for this?

Not to sound conspiratorial but it’s getting to the point where it feels like the government put them up to this.

Super disappointed in Apple, and I now don’t feel safe upgrading to iOS 15 or buying a new iPhone once iOS 15 is released.
 
Maybe one could explain to me what kind of photos are you feared to show to Apple? I know, I know, it will heavily rain those red thumbs down scores. But maybe you can share your concerns with REAL examples.

In my world: I never had and never and know no one off of my friends, relatives and parents who ever had taken at any time naked pictures of them selfes, nor do I wish to have contact with those.

Also: What if Apple's take on this would decimate child porn world wide like at about 50%? Wouldn't it be worth it?

Here is an example on possible matches.

 
Perfectly reasonable explanation and exactly what I and many others have been telling the concerned (and some outright paranoid) on this forum. But no surprise those naysayers immediately jumped on this thread to dismiss everything that was said. They have already tried, convicted, and hanged Apple in their mind and nothing will change that for them. So silly, but what can you do? Some people take cynicism to an unbelievable extreme. Apple could even hire an independent firm to confirm all their claims, yet these people would just cry, "Paid shills!" :rolleyes:
 
If no data leaves the device how will this help at all? Even if I have a picture from their database they would never know because no data leave the device.
If you are careful enough to never turn on iCloud Photos (which sometimes they are enabled by default), yes. Your phone still does the scanning, but any vouchers (if generated) will not be communicated with Apple. At least for now. Since iOS is not open source, you will never know.

And the problem remains, that the fact the scanning still takes place locally, on everyone's iPhones worldwide.
 
Why are they doubling down on this so hard? Who asked them for this?

Not to sound conspiratorial but it’s getting to the point where it feels like the government put them up to this.

Super disappointed in Apple, and I now don’t feel safe upgrading to iOS 15 or buying a new iPhone once iOS 15 is released.
Makes me wonder what Tim Cook got during the Sun Valley camp.
 
If no data leaves the device how will this help at all? Even if I have a picture from their database they would never know because no data leave the device.
It would really help if you actually read their FAQ on how they do this. And when.


I am not saying this is wrong or right, just yet. It won’t even affect me, since I am not American. I do have concerns. Any such technology can always be abused. And when it can be abused, it is only a matter of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 09872738
If you are careful enough to never turn on iCloud Photos (which sometimes they are enabled by default), yes. Your phone still does the scanning, but any vouchers (if generated) will not be communicated with Apple. At least for now. Since iOS is not open source, you will never know.
At the very least I paid for iCloud Photos as a component of buying the device. Therefore iCloud storage is reasonably an extension of my device and protected from illegal search and seizure. While Apple isn't directly a government agent even landlords can not simply enter tenant's domicile at will.

Turning off iCloud shouldn't even be considered as a solution because it's just another room associated with my devices.
 
It would really help if you actually read their FAQ on how they do this. And when.


I am not saying this is wrong or right, just yet. It won’t even affect me, since I am not American. I do have concerns. Any such technology can always be abused. And when it can be abused, it is only a matter of time.
I have read it. Data that contains information about the content on my device leaves the device.

Years ago you could figure out if someone was home by calling over and over until you got a busy signal. That busy signal is data that can be extrapolated to tell you all sorts of things. Anything that provides any information about the device's content is sharing device data.
 
… since I am not American. I do have concerns. Any such technology can always be abused. And when it can be abused, it is only a matter of time.
Yes. That make me wonder. How are they implementing the code on the device? They say its in OS but only enabled in US. How technically is that gonna work? Different OS distributions depending on localization?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Philip_S
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.