My bike still moves forward when I back pedal. I don't go for the cheap $50 dollar bikes that come in a box.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Products Top U.S. Retail Desktop and Notebook Sales Lists
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
My bike still moves forward when I back pedal. I don't go for the cheap $50 dollar bikes that come in a box.
No, I was simply refuting your ludicrous claim to 10.4 users having had "years" to upgrade, and have not:
The majority of them have, in contrast to your supposed "comfort zone." The same cannot be said for the Windows side.
10.4 users indeed have had less than half the years leading up to an upgrade path (to spell it out for you) than XP users have, and with considerably better results, though you have been side pedaling from this issue from the outset.
Checking the statistics in February will very likely not substantially alter what has not happened during the past several years.
We'll reaffirm who's narrow minded assertions are moot, nonsensical, and ludicrous, then.
Hence, the majority upgraded within that comparatively short time span.
You claimed that they had not.
You've just inadvertently pwned yourself.
Side pedaling again, Shaw?
No, "side pedaling" would be to ignore the fact that you've been proven absolutely wrong about the "2 years" claim, and change the topic to a new argument.
No amount of back pedaling, nor side pedaling, will negate your erroneous blunder:
The argument, from the outset, was focused on the comparison of upgrade percentages between the two platforms.
It is you, who has been side pedaling and grasping at straws, yet ignoring the issue.
How typical.
Erroneous blunder? I feel like I'm in an argument with Borat....
- One in six Apple OSX users is still running 10.4
- They've had 2 years to upgrade
- If they're still running Apple OSX 10.4, then obviously they "have not" upgraded
What is erroneous?
I'm bowing out of this surreal argument - I don't need to have the last word, and the other readers won't want to see this go on and on and on and on....
Your implication that 10.4 users and XP users are on equal grounds in regard to upgrades, through loosely applied terms such as "years" and "people," is, perhaps, more deceptive, than erroneous - pathetic, nonetheless.
This has been the subject of debate, from the outset - yet you insist on downplaying the extent that a large percentage of 10.4 users have gone onto 10.5 and beyond, while flippantly disregarding the much smaller migration beyond XP.
Asserting that the two situations are comparable - that is beyond surreal.
Your implication that 10.4 users and XP users are on equal grounds in regard to upgrades, through loosely applied terms such as "years" and "people," is, perhaps, more deceptive, than erroneous - pathetic, nonetheless.
This has been the subject of debate, from the outset - yet you insist on downplaying the extent that a large percentage of 10.4 users have gone onto 10.5 and beyond, while flippantly disregarding the much smaller migration beyond XP.
Asserting that the two situations are comparable - that is beyond surreal.
![os_share_0910-3a.png]()
I swear you've implanted a dictionary into your head.
Regardez, the hypocrite.
Which dictionary, do you suppose, utilizes the verb "tooks?"
Epic.
Probably the same one that confuses the definition of renaissance as "growth" instead of "rebirth":
I ignored that when I first read it, because it's too petty to nit-pick grammar and typos on a forum - unless posts by the nit-picker are full of errors.
And I think that it's Regardez, l'hypocrit, by the way.
Renaissance is perfectly appropriate, as Windows was QDOS, reborn.
LOL, try "l'hypocrite." (Comic Platinum)
The intermingling of French and English is well within the realm of common practice, during the 19-21st Centuries, used mostly for exclamatory purposes.
"L'hypocrite" would be a bit too pretentious, though, apparently, not for you.
Keep on chugging, lil' engine, try a little harder:
Vous êtes pédalant en arrière.
A lot of other bad practices are in common use, as well.
"Lil" is a kind of prefix and is the short form of "little". It is sometimes spelled with an apostrophe as "Li'l", or in the more common but incorrect form "Lil'". (link)
Keep digging yourself into that hole with those common bad practices....
Says he, who hypocritically misspells "l'hypocrite."
Just speaking down to your rudimentary level, lil' Aiden.
"Vous êtes pédalant en arrière."
You seem to have pedaled deep into the confines of your own.
Says he, who hypocritically misspells "l'hypocrite."
Damn, I hate those invariant en genre nouns....