I’d 100% buy this argument if it was still a budget phone, but it’s not.
I will second that its not a deal breaker for me either.In my case, they’re right. I don’t see lack of MagSafe as a dealbreaker. I’ll be picking up mine tomorrow.
Not sure what you’re getting at, but just to be clear, the 16e has wireless charging and it works with any US$10 third party wireless charger.If they made their own, let's see, charging pad, that you could just lay your phone on that might help even poor people use induction charging.
Absolutely. MR and all the tech reviews is a bubble. I can confirm this in anecdotal cases. I know a ton of people with iPhones, young and old and most do not even know that they have Magsafe and if they know they still charge mainly from the cable. So in the case of the budget iPhone the percentage of people who need Magsafe is probably even lower. The situation would probably be different if Apple would be including wireless puck in the box.If Apple’s customer surveys and data are correct then it is yet another example of the disconnect between the techie wannabe crowd and real people. In the fantasy world of the techie wannabes Apple devices should immediately adopt any and all “new” technology. If the latest product doesn’t have features or hardware that just got out of the lab then it’s a miserable failure.
After fifty years of existence I think Apple knows who its customers are and it’s not the crowd in these forums.
A standard? I don’t think so.this is really silly. trying to establish a standard or not!?
You can get MagSafe cases for iPhones without MagSafe, although reportedly only a minority of them are good.Actually, it’s a stupid move by Apple. They should have sacrificed the almost useless action button for MagSafe.
MagSafe opens the door for them to sell accessories like cases. 🤦♂️
If you would have read the article, that is not the case. It's the result of analyzing its user base and determine from that what to include to weigh the cost vs. user value balance.I heard the magnets could be a problem for the C1 modem, and that Qualcomm has done a lot of work to figure that out. That explanation makes a lot more sense to me than cost cutting.
Apple should hire you 😁 We can clearly see that you have better data than them.Actually, it’s a stupid move by Apple. They should have sacrificed the almost useless action button for MagSafe.
MagSafe opens the door for them to sell accessories like cases. 🤦♂️
Careful, you’re applying logic to a conversation Apple had with a sycophant who would not dare ask an intelligent follow-up.Well, if you want to play this game... those people were also likely happy with their audio jack, but apparently this didn't prevent Apple from removing it.
While I agree this is mainly about cost, your analogy is off base. A better analogy would be saying that people in that target audience for lower cost iPhones are less concerned about the camera on average. And that might be true actually.To make you pay more for the better phones they make sure the cheap phones have undesirable features. But they should not take their customers for idiots by providing such a stupid explanation.
"The phone has a worse camera because most people in the target audience have bad eyesight." Sure, sure.
That’s the Gruber in your head. Here’s the actual Gruber:Gruber will never say anything even slightly critical of Apple.
Or they could’ve just, you know, added MagSafe..Interestingly, IT Home reports that Apple retail stores have had to create a workaround for displaying the iPhone 16e with wireless charging that prevents the device from slipping off its display dock. Apple is using a special docking station that includes a bottom groove that holds the device upright, enabling wireless charging during demonstrations. This custom dock only activates charging when the phone is placed vertically – if you place it horizontally, the iPhone falls off.
Blame the customer…nice. How the hell do you know the “market” aka poor people, don’t use magsafe chargers?