Petty!
It doesn't strike as unethical or petty to make a deal (FRAND in this case) and not abide by it through a loophole?
Petty!
I love it. 40 lawsuits? That's obscene and hard to believe it's sole intent isn't to unfairly enrich themselves.
In the wake of its legal dispute with Nokia, Apple has pulled all Withings-branded accessories from its online store and presumably from all of its retail stores around the world.
Apple appears to have pulled the accessories in the last day or two, eliminating Withings products like the Body Cardio Scale, the Smart Body Analyzer, and the Wireless Blood Pressure Monitor. When searching for these products on Apple's site, they are no longer listed as available for purchase.
Apple has stopped offering all Withings products because Withings is owned by Nokia following a spring 2016 purchase worth an estimated $192 million. The Withings brand has been integrated into Nokia's Digital Health unit and is led by Cedric Hutchings, formerly the CEO of Withings.
Earlier this week, Apple filed an antitrust lawsuit accusing Nokia and several patent assertion entities of illegally transferring patents to attempt to extort excessive royalty fees from the Cupertino company. Apple had established FRAND (Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory) deals with Nokia, but by transferring patents to patent holding companies, additional royalties can be demanded.![]()
A cached version of the listing for the Withings Wireless Blood Pressure Monitor, no longer available from Apple.com
In response, Nokia filed 40 patent infringement lawsuits against Apple across 11 countries, accusing the Cupertino company of failing to establish licensing deals for Nokia patents that cover displays, user interface, software, antenna, chipsets, and video coding.
According to Apple, Nokia has been conspiring with patent assertion entities (Acacia Research and Conversant Property Management) in an "illegal patent transfer scheme" to wring money out of Apple because Nokia's cell phone business is failing. Nokia, meanwhile, says that it has not been able to reach a licensing agreement with Apple and must defend its rights.
Article Link: Apple Pulls All Withings Accessories From Apple Online Store Following Nokia Lawsuit
Poor little Timmy - having a temper tamptrum.
If so, master Timmy should stop selling Fitbit products.
Yeah, because Samsung's Galaxy (introduced shortly after iPhone) took the likeness and several features of iPhone. They even have internal documents showing them ripping off the design, so it would seem legitimate. Who else is Apple suing?
[doublepost=1482539459][/doublepost]
Good for you.
Yeah, because Samsung's Galaxy (introduced shortly after iPhone) took the likeness and several features of iPhone. They even have internal documents showing them ripping off the design, so it would seem legitimate. Who else is Apple suing?
[doublepost=1482539459][/doublepost]
Good for you.
not the first time Apple pull this crap. It's almost if the entire retail market is controlled by some with the maturity of highschool freshman
oh - Apple introduced the flat UI to iOS and macOS that Microsoft first introduced!!
It was Nokia that spit in Apple's eye. They should just accept and continue letting them benefit by continuing to allow Apple Store presence? That makes no sense. Do you often let others walk all over you?
Apple doesn't need to court order. They think Nokia is violating their agreements and they are free to take action against it and of course, make sure there is no conflicts of interest.That has yet to be determined by the courts.
Right, that was my point. They're acting like a child, when there's no consequence in doing so.
Most companies tend not to enjoy funding lawsuits held against them... It's not about "throwing the toys out with the pram," it's about preventing conflicts of interest.
This doesn't seem childish to me. Why generate income for a hostile entity, against your own interests, that is actively trying to destroy your primary line of business? If I were a still a stockholder, I would demand this.
This doesn't seem childish to me. Why generate income for a hostile entity, against your own interests, that is actively trying to destroy your primary line of business? If I were a still a stockholder, I would demand this.
Why generate income for a hostile entity, against your own interests, that is actively trying to destroy your primary line of business? If I were a still a stockholder, I would demand this.
Earlier this year, Apple paid Samsung $2.6 billion to ramp up OLED production for them for next year. Do you have any idea how much money Apple gives Samsung? Half your iPhone is made by Samsung.
So are you saying Apple should stop giving so much money to Samsung (and close their iPhone business) or Samsung should stop doing business with Apple and force Apple out of the iPhone market (while causing Samsung to lose $10+ billion a year?
Thank goodness for Apple you're not a stockholder.
except for their patents!!!!!They probably would, but they actually need Samsung as a supplier, since Apple doesn't actually make any part of its gadgets themselves...
They don't need Nokia for anything
Samsung is not a hostile entity that the OP presents. I'm sure the CEOs and lawyers can still grab beers togetherEarlier this year, Apple paid Samsung $2.6 billion to ramp up OLED production for them for next year. Do you have any idea how much money Apple gives Samsung? Half your iPhone is made by Samsung.
So are you saying Apple should stop giving so much money to Samsung (and close their iPhone business) or Samsung should stop doing business with Apple and force Apple out of the iPhone market (while causing Samsung to lose $10+ billion a year?
Thank goodness for Apple you're not a stockholder.
It's not petty. If a company is suing you, and doing it in the way described in this article, you are not going to devote space on your shelves, in your retail stores, to that company. Simple.