Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This stuff is hard to get right, and Apple isn't up to the task. A system like this has to be 100% reliable. Apple can't even get the Remote app to reliably work with the Apple TV. Sometimes the Apple TV chokes and needs to be powered down and rebooted. That's acceptable for a set top box but not when you want to turn the lights on.

If they can't get the simple interaction between an iPhone and an Apple TV on a WiFi network to be bulletproof, I'm not expecting great things for HomeKit.
You're correct that it's hard to get this right. Whether Apple is up to the task is yet to be seen.

Much of what Apple gets right is also hard to get right.
 
HomeKit has been "available" to developers for less than a year and unlike other updates to the SDK, it requires new hardware to truly be effective. Apple's cash balance doesn't mean much when HomeKit requires 3rd party companies to define and develop entirely new hardware/software products to utilize it. Of course it's going to take some time.

That seems like the wrong approach... there is tons of home automation and security hardware already. They should enabling talking to some of it. Developing whole new hardware is probably why they aren't getting movement.

Great post. Some people really need to understand how HomeKit works before posting. Its not on Apples side, but waiting for manufacturers to come out with products that utilize it.

Seems more like an Apple problem to me. There's tons of hardware already. A lot of it connectable already. If Apple insists on only connecting to it their way, it's going to be hard to get the big home automation and security vendors to move in any reasonable amount of time.
 
Great

Most likely with the revealed glaring security holes found in Apple Watch, maybe Apple is pulling back on efforts to connect your home up and allowed it to be accessed by someone that stole your Apple Watch and hit the reset switch.

Personally I do not trust Apple anymore and will not allow an Apple product do to something like open my front door or garage; Apple simply has not demonstrated any form of responsibility when it comes to service security. EVERY new product or OS release is plagued by stupid and obvious security holes that should have been easily identified by even the most basic of Q/A process.

Why on earth will I want my home to be unlocked by waving an Apple product around or telling Siri to open my garage door? Siri can't even tell me what movies are playing in my city property so how the **** do I trust her to protect my home when I am not there.

If Apple wants to be the center of my universe they better start getting their **** together and start testing their stuff before they release it on the world. They can start by investing billions into a god damned Q/A department.
 
Everybody and their brother has a home automation "hub", and I'm sure they are all ready to kowtow and let the big "A" have their hard-earned market shares. Stuff like this makes me question Tim Cook's competence. Does the man have a strategic bone in his body?

I suspect he is part of the problem and he needs to GO. If Apple wants to have someone kick the company in the a$$ to get things done right, Tim is NOT the guy to do it. I question his competence to this day ever since he got promoted to CEO and still believe he's a hypocrite.

All of a sudden, other competition have been changing CEOs for the better and doing something about it. Look at Microsoft. They got the right guy to get things done and to a good direction. So far, so good.

Look at Apple. WTF? No matter how hard Tim tries to puff up the fact that there are no egos in his office or executive level positions, I find it extremely hard to believe.

Beats is an excellent example where there is infusion of arrogance. I could go on and on.

But this Homekit thing is getting ridiculous. Why didn't they do this earlier before the watch? This should've been implemented in the iPhone program rather than waiting for the Apple Watch to take fruition.
 
That seems like the wrong approach... there is tons of home automation and security hardware already. They should enabling talking to some of it. Developing whole new hardware is probably why they aren't getting movement.

Meanwhile I have been controlling all my outside flood and pool lights with cheap X10 hardware for 15+ years.......
 
Everybody and their brother has a home automation "hub", and I'm sure they are all ready to kowtow and let the big "A" have their hard-earned market shares. Stuff like this makes me question Tim Cook's competence. Does the man have a strategic bone in his body?

He certainly does. The same thing could be said about the MP3 player market and the state of the music market and industry back in 2001. And then the iPod cleaned up.

Yes, there are a handful of hubs, but still no great easy to program solution for the masses. I've used a MiCasaVerde hub with Z-Wave sensors and cameras for a few years and can attest that a very tech-oriented people can create a competent HA system - but still leaves a lot to be desired. For anyone that's not tech-oriented, it's a major chore creating robust HA systems that are also secure. The market is currently very fragmented and the time is extraordinarily ripe for a company like Apple to add some muscle, technical expertise, and perhaps even standards to craft an easy to use solution for all. One which will will also drive iOS device sales.

Strategic vision at its finest. Kudos to Mr. Cook for moving forward on this excellent opportunity and untapped market.
 
Last edited:
Could an editor or mod change the title to reflect the spokesperson's statement?
 
mistaken story

Instead of adding an update, doesn't it make more sense to retract the initial story? Delete it?
 
Most likely with the revealed glaring security holes found in Apple Watch, maybe Apple is pulling back on efforts to connect your home up and allowed it to be accessed by someone that stole your Apple Watch and hit the reset switch.

Personally I do not trust Apple anymore and will not allow an Apple product do to something like open my front door or garage; Apple simply has not demonstrated any form of responsibility when it comes to service security. EVERY new product or OS release is plagued by stupid and obvious security holes that should have been easily identified by even the most basic of Q/A process.

Why on earth will I want my home to be unlocked by waving an Apple product around or telling Siri to open my garage door? Siri can't even tell me what movies are playing in my city property so how the **** do I trust her to protect my home when I am not there.

If Apple wants to be the center of my universe they better start getting their **** together and start testing their stuff before they release it on the world. They can start by investing billions into a god damned Q/A department.

I am curious. Can you post some of these security issues?
 
"Apple has pushed back the target release date of its home automation platform, HomeKit."

Darn it. It's just been such a pain to flip the switch on the wall to turn on the lights or the heater. Thank goodness there are bright people at work coming up with a solution to fix this big problem.
 
There was a time when the WSJ was not consistently incompetent

----------

I suspect he is part of the problem and he needs to GO. If Apple wants to have someone kick the company in the a$$ to get things done right, Tim is NOT the guy to do it. I question his competence to this day ever since he got promoted to CEO and still believe he's a hypocrite.

All of a sudden, other competition have been changing CEOs for the better and doing something about it. Look at Microsoft. They got the right guy to get things done and to a good direction. So far, so good.

Look at Apple. WTF? No matter how hard Tim tries to puff up the fact that there are no egos in his office or executive level positions, I find it extremely hard to believe.

Beats is an excellent example where there is infusion of arrogance. I could go on and on.

But this Homekit thing is getting ridiculous. Why didn't they do this earlier before the watch? This should've been implemented in the iPhone program rather than waiting for the Apple Watch to take fruition.

I don't understand any of this.

----------

I am curious. Can you post some of these security issues?

He thinks because someone could steal a watch it is a glaring security hole.

I guess people will start stealing houses when apple gets involved.
 
"HomeKit [hardware certification] has been available for just a few months and we already have dozens of partners who have committed to bringing HomeKit accessories to market and we're looking forward to the first ones coming next month," said Apple spokeswoman Trudy Muller.

Run. On.

This statement needs so many more periods in it.
 
This stuff is hard to get right, and Apple isn't up to the task. A system like this has to be 100% reliable. Apple can't even get the Remote app to reliably work with the Apple TV. Sometimes the Apple TV chokes and needs to be powered down and rebooted. That's acceptable for a set top box but not when you want to turn the lights on.

If they can't get the simple interaction between an iPhone and an Apple TV on a WiFi network to be bulletproof, I'm not expecting great things for HomeKit.
Since home automation for the general public has been out for about 35 years, it's nice to have someone like Apple make it more standard.
 
This is why I stop browsing Mac Rumor: Authors use Rumor as Fact in the article.
Get the f. straight and change that damn title.
 
Yeah I think we can forget the whole notion of the Apple TV as a home hub.

I mean if you think about it, the Time Capsule is the perfect platform for an all in one: Apple TV - Home Hub - Router - Media Server - NAS - Time Machine.

They just don't think that way. Different devices, different connectors, different dongles = more revenue.

If you think about it, who the f would buy 2-3 Apple TV-Home Hub-Router-Media Server - NAS - Time Machine combo units because they have 2-3 TVs to stream contents? Give me a break. Apple TV should and will always be a stand alone device because multiple unis are used in one household.
The Hub, however, can be combined with Airport device because we only need ONE/household as I said it in other threat when people kept saying Apple TV should be a central hub.
 
How log can a guy hold out for? There's got to be a limit.

I mean, I have motion sensing switches and keypad locks. I don't have a need for the ability to preheat my oven from an app at the grocery store. My desire for such a thing will increase when Siri can handle it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.