Lame. Get your act together apple, you have 200B large in the bank
So by saying "200B Large", then you're saying that Apple has $200 Trillion dollars in the bank.
That is a lot of bread man.
Lame. Get your act together apple, you have 200B large in the bank
For me, the remote works too well.
My friend owns an Apple TV, and whenever we meet up there and watch something on the Apple TV, using the remote controls all our MacBooks at once. iTunes plays, the volume is unmated on all of them, etc.
Seriously, WTF MacRumors? Unnamed "sources" tell Fortune something and you run a declarative banner. A _named_ Apple spokesperson refutes that and ..... You let the BS banner stay unchanged. Stay classy MR. Stay classy.
Lame. Get your act together apple, you have 200B large in the bank
Its unbelievable that a company of Apple's size still runs these products like grad school projects.
Someone has probably already mentioned this.. but you need to pair the remote if you have more then one device. In your Security & Privacy setting I believe (2013 rMBP, so no IR port).
HomeKit has the potential to revolutionise (home) life as we all know it, realising the full potential of the Internet of Things in the most user friendly of ways.
A short delay to get it right is well worth the wait.
At the risk of showing my age, this is the kind of stuff we could only imagine as kids.
Ok, perhaps more than an update at the bottom of the article is in order, perhaps an article Title correction? Apple has actually responded publicly, and the Article's title is blatantly false? At least put the update at the top of the article.
People posting obviously having seen only the Title and the first few sentences, and not the update at the end of the article.
Appreciate the education on Amdahl's law though
Hasn't it always been thus in the tech world? Stuff that isn't ready for prime time, on time, gets dropped to the next version?
Bravo SierraI'm just teasing you...
Mac, meaning Macintosh, and later all things
Runors, meaning the reporting may not be base in fact,name have some conjecture...
I agree...but I REALLY wish Apple would have taken control of the hardware instead of allowing 3rd parties to control it, pricing will remain $50 for a light bulb
BTW did they ever get HealthKit figured out? Or whatever it's called.
Ok, perhaps more than an update at the bottom of the article is in order, perhaps an article Title correction? Apple has actually responded publicly, and the Article's title is blatantly false? At least put the update at the top of the article.
People posting obviously having seen only the Title and the first few sentences, and not the update at the end of the article.
Appreciate the education on Amdahl's law though
Hasn't it always been thus in the tech world? Stuff that isn't ready for prime time, on time, gets dropped to the next version?
The question was about Apple Watch security issues. I didn't see any at the link you posted.
You will not see Finder hanging on file sharing transfers if you don't have multiple macs at home, or don't engage much in transferring material between them.
etc etc
Its unbelievable that a company of Apple's size still runs these products like grad school projects.
I'm just teasing you...
Mac, meaning Macintosh, and later all things
Runors, meaning the reporting may not be base in fact,name have some conjecture...
EDIT: no idea how "teasing" became "sawing"
Then why are you here?Its unbelievable that a site like MR will publish any garbage rumor, use the most clickbait title possible and don't have the integrity to fix it when it turns out absolutely false (correcting at the end is not the way it is done) and people like you, will then use this garbage "rumor" to rag on Apple....
----------
When something is refuted it is not a rumor, and leaving the title like this with a correction a the very end of a long article is blatant misinformation and extreme bad journalism (or blogism). That means this site doesn't care about its integrity or its reputation and will do anything for money.
Here are a few to ponder.
http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/apple-watch-x-security-questions-a-7997/op-1