Really? I suppose that's why I kept saying over and over that some people do need Mac Pro's, just not every professional.
The funniest thing is, the close mindedness comes from the other side, from people who think that just because they need the horsepower, all professionals do.
Maybe actually read the posts before you reply next time.
While not terribly enjoyable you can use an external hard drive on the iMac and boot off of it. It helps to have a spare around for diagnostic purposes anyways. FireWire 400 was fast enough back in my day. 800 is standard now and Thunderbolt if anyone on Earth has one of those is faster.I'm not going to argue over weather the iMac is powerful enough to do such and such. It is a powerful machine.
What sucks is today if a hard drive would die in my MacPro, I run to the nearest store and can pop in a SATA drive in under a half hour. People who deal with mission critical deadlines, this is enormous. If a hard drive were to die in a current generation iMac, you are toast for at least what, 2 days? It has to be replaced by Apple using their now stupid in drive thermal sensors.
Hard drives die. I've swapped hard drives in iMacs before (when the thermal sensors were just attached to regular SATA drives) and it is no picnic and not something the average user can do.
Why not just add a 2nd 2560x1440 display to it?The iMac comes in 21.5 and 27". The industry standard setup is 2 x 24" 1920x1200 monitors. If you ad a 24" to either of those, the aspect ratio gets f'd not to mention how un cosher it looks.
So you're calling me an "iTard" while stating professionals buy their displays by their looks?not to mention how un cosher it looks
The iMac comes in 21.5 and 27". The industry standard setup is 2 x 24" 1920x1200 monitors. If you ad a 24" to either of those, the aspect ratio gets f'd not to mention how un cosher it looks.
The fact that I had to spell that out for you demonstrates how big of a iTard you must be.
'Again the same ignorance. Your workflow is not very much the same as all others. Your workflow is very much the same as "some" others. See the difference?'
Going so far as to even make me look as if i make sweeping generalizations. I never said all, some, many, or anything in regards to numbers.
But since im not alone, then I can make that statement. The 500 and counting replies in this thread are proof of that.
I don't think the majority of us would argue that EVERY graphics designer NEEDS a mac pro. Just that for a lot of "Pro" users, the iMac is insufficient, so the Mac Pro should definitely be kept in apple's product line!
I don't think the majority of us would argue that EVERY graphics designer NEEDS a mac pro. Just that for a lot of "Pro" users, the iMac is insufficient, so the Mac Pro should definitely be kept in apple's product line!
I don't see many people saying that Apple "should" drop them.Well so fast, the MAJORITY of people stating they should drop the Pro don't use one in a professional environment.
Of course.Please note the, MAJORITY, word. So if it was dropped I do get the feeling that Apple would have a backlash from the market.
Indeed.
There is a market for people who demand power and expandability, things that the iMac doesn't deliver. Apple killing the MacPro without offering a solution for these needs would be a mistake since these folks are the ones creating content for the iToys.
Apple stopped licensing Mac OS out to prevent these vendors from taking all the high profit high-end sales. If high-end sales are no longer interesting or profitable for Apple, maybe it's time for them to reconsider licensing Mac OS X to select high-end system vendors. Maybe IBM for blades or racks? What other potential licensee makes systems that wouldn't degrade the Mac OS experience?
I agree that the majority of people wouldn't argue that all graphic designer needs a mac pro. But when I see such furious claims in this thread, I respond.
But it's again the adjectives. When you say a lot of the pro users, that still covers a small part of all pro users. So a lot does not mean majority.
Again, wrong. These folks are "some" of the ones creating content for the iToys. You can create content for the iToys using a MacBook Air. Depends on the content.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)
I have always used a Mac Pro/Powermac for the last 10 years. But my next computer will be a iMac.
Just doesn't make any sense to get Mac Pro when the iMacs are so much cheaper and blow away lasts years Mac Pro. Thunderbolt is already making big waves in the audio/video post world.
So ... its just come down to what exactly IS a pro user, and what constitutes pro work. You could say that if I used a computer to make money for my business, I am a professional user. I think that is clearly not what we mean here.
I think many "real" pro users contentions are that far too many people would like to think of themselves as "pro" users. I don't think using photoshop or CS5, for example, necessarily makes you a "pro" user.
I think for the majority (yes, majority!) of what I (emphasis) would consider "pro" users NEED the power and expandability of a Mac Pro, or at least could use it very well!
You still confused, in any moment I said ALL, I always said LOTS, that don't necessarily means the majority but a good chunk of people who actually demand power and expandability, something that you should understand since you have a MacPro looking at you signature.![]()
Who exactly "needs" a Mac Pro to create iToy content?since these folks are the ones creating content for the iToys.