Exactly this.
I've never set up a password on my phone because:
A) I'm not doing anything wrong. Go ahead and waste your time looking through my phone.
B) I don't keep anything important on my phone.
If I steal your phone, I'll rent it out to people who need to make expensive long distance calls. The calls all go onto your bill. Someone with family living in India or Newzealand will be only too happy to have your phone.
[doublepost=1469373348][/doublepost]
Set an alarm for 4amThis also forces me to sleep less than 8 hrs at night, or I will need to enter passcode after getting up.
[doublepost=1469374568][/doublepost]
Ten guesses is all they get before my iPhone erases it's memory.
If I've got that set to erase I can't see why 6-digits would be better?
(Other than watching me type the password, it's easier to see 4 digits than 6)
Gary
Well, the difference is that _if_ someone finds a way around the "ten guesses" limit, then they still have a million passcodes to try out.
[doublepost=1469374862][/doublepost]
Liked the movie analogy.
For people who feel like paranoia is the way to go, fine for them, but Apple isn't giving the rest of us the choice. It's either (to borrow another analogy) leave the front door unlocked all the time or have it lock behind you automatically whenever you go out to the mailbox. The fingerprint scan is plenty secure against theft. The only reason to add frequent passcode entry over the choice of the user is, essentially, to make a political statement.
The passcode helps turning your iPhone into a brick when someone steals it. The value of a stolen iPhone is lowered an awful lot by using a passcode. But how does that protect _me_? It protects me if _everyone_ uses a passcode, so no stolen iPhone is worth anything, so thieves stop stealing iPhones. If only half the iPhones have a passcode, thieves will continue stealing them, and if they steal my iPhone with a passcode, they throw it away and steal another one.