Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,464
37,702



Apple today announced a new MacBook Air with 8th-generation Intel chips, a Retina display, USB-C ports, and up to 16GB of RAM, a machine that, all in all, sounds a lot like the 12-inch MacBook.

Apple did not announce updates to its smaller notebook machine, but it did quietly remove the Rose Gold color as a purchase option. The 12-inch MacBook can now be purchased in Silver, Space Gray, and Gold, but not Rose Gold.

macbooknorosegold-800x600.jpg

It's not clear why Apple has removed Rose Gold as a color option, but no other Macs are available in the pinker shade, suggesting the Rose Gold color is out at Apple. The MacBook Air, like the MacBook, can be purchased in Silver, Space Gray, and Gold.

Apple does not appear to have made any other changes to the 12-inch MacBook and its future is somewhat unclear with the addition of a powerful $1,199 MacBook Air with a Retina display.

Article Link: Apple Quietly Eliminates Rose Gold 12-Inch MacBook
 
Now, MacBook Air replaced the 12" macbook? because the new MacBook Air uses Y class intel cpu, right?
 
I am thinking that the new iPad Pro is faster then the current line of Macbooks.

Apple's once secret war with intel is becoming more and more not-so-secret.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacGurl111
I am thinking that the new iPad Pro is faster then the current line of Macbooks.

Apple's once secret war with intel is becoming more and more not-so-secret.
I just wish they would stop using intel's ******** built-in GPUs and bundle in their own. The GPU is the highlight of the new iPads
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
Such a strange lineup it has become.

I was expecting them to kill the 'Air' name since they did so with the iPad. which now has a 'regular' iPad and a iPad Pro. Then we got the (underpowered but expensive) MacBook and always had a MacBook Pro, which suits the lineup logic. But the Air is now still here. Instead I think they should have killed the name and gave this spec bump to the MacBook since they're so similar now.
 
Bet the 12” gets an A13 chip at some point.
Touchable iPads.
Non touch low power consumption Macbook 12”.
Non touch MacBooks with higher spec Intel processors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: radiologyman
The right move would have been to merge the 12” MacBook and Air into a single updated machine and added a 14” MacBook to Air depending on the naming.

That would give users 4 size options across 2 product lines. There are a lot of users out there who don’t need a 15” Pro with 6 cores but would like a larger screen than the 13” Pro or Air offers. Staggering the sizes in the product line would make sense. A 14” Air could still have been 3 lbs or less.
 
Isn’t this thing pretty much useless to their lineup now?
The new MBA still weighs noticeably more than the MB (1.25 kg vs 0.92 kg or 36% more), plus it's thicker (17%).
[doublepost=1540924781][/doublepost]
The MacBook shouldn’t even exist anymore. Who would buy one, and why?
If it is going to remain in the lineup, the price should have dropped dramatically. It makes no sense.
When the 12" MB was introduced, it's main attraction (compared to then MBA) next to the Retina screen was it's smaller size and weight (920 g vs 1350 g). It lost some of its size advantage (thickness originally 13.1 mm vs then 17 mm, now vs 15.5 mm) but the weight advantage is still significant (now 920 g vs 1250 g).
 
What is the argument for the MacBook now? And I mean this as a serious question -- I genuinely don't understand.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.