Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In what way? (I ask because the only limitation I've come across deals with the devices that lack wifi).

For wifi sync to work, you need the iPhone and the Mac to be able to communicate over the LAN. Many public, school, and work wifi networks do not allow this (seems to be any network that has a RADIUS username/password authentication, but I don't know if this is the cause). Of course, Apple can't help this. As for iOS-specific limitations, you can't set up a phone or restore a backup over wifi.
 
Be reminded, it was first marketed as a good second computer, not as one's primary computer.

Sure but it IS powerful enough to be one's primary and only computer (easily). It is for me and I run a web design and development company. I don't need a MacBook Pro to work with 1200px wide web design files in Photoshop. Heck I could do that with ease on a machine that's 10 years old. And I don't need any power at all for working with code. So it would be nice to be able to plug it into all my stuff at the office.

It's still amazes to me that this tiny little machine (my 11" MacBook Air) that I just carry around from place to place in my hand (no laptop bag) can be transformed into a full-on workstation when I get to the office and plugin it into my dual 27" TB monitors, keyboard, mouse, time machine, etc. I'm on my third 11" MacBook Air now and I've absolutely LOVED every one I've owned.

Anyway, if there's some kind of hub available that I can plug all of the above into for office use I'd buy the new 12" machine in a heartbeat. If not (as I suspect will be the case)... I don't know. I'd hate to have to move up to the bigger, heavier, pricey-er 13" Air... let alone a pro... just so I can get a few ports. At least they're keeping the 13". I won't have nearly the same amount of love for a 13" though. The 11" was perfect.
 
Last edited:
I can't help feeling you'll see a array of cables hanging off from one USB-C port, since there is only one separate usb port as well..

Apple sure likes the "one port" for convenience don't they.
 
Who even buys the MBA when they could buy a 13" retina pro? It's not like the rMBP isn't ultra-portable or doesn't have a great battery life already.

Sure the MBA might be a little lighter with a little better battery but it comes at an enormous performance cost. I mean I guess if you are a die-hard Starbucks dweller who needs to surf facebook for 12 hours, then I guess the Air is for you since it's about all it can do, somewhat negating the need for huge battery life IMO.

And it sounds like they are going to keep the 13" air with it's screen from 2003? lolol.

I recently bought a base Macbook Air 13in from BB for $750 ($100 sale discount plus $150 education discount) for home. I think it is a terrific computer. I also have one at work, and it does everything I need. My college age daughter uses an MBA for school, and it has been great....no limitations. The MBA is a favorite of many of her friends at school.

When you say "who even buys the MBA", I am just wondering what exactly you imagine 95% of the computer buying public do with their laptops? Specifically, what are the limitations of an MBA that make it such a bad deal for these users. The MBA is an incredibly popular laptop. It is priced $300 below the entry rMBP, and many folks just don't need or care about the difference in capability.

I understand that the display could be better, but I suspect 90% of the computer buying public are perfectly satisfied with the MBA screen and can't discern or describe the display difference compared to higher priced laptops....unless of course, you point it out and made a big deal out of it. Then, it gets into your head....oh my god, I must have a retina display.

If you prefer the rMBP, that's fine. I understand that there are different computers for different needs and desires. I just don't understand the perspective that the MBA does not fit a wide market of users, when it clearly does.
 
Last edited:
Who even buys the MBA when they could buy a 13" retina pro? It's not like the rMBP isn't ultra-portable or doesn't have a great battery life already.

Sure the MBA might be a little lighter with a little better battery but it comes at an enormous performance cost. I mean I guess if you are a die-hard Starbucks dweller who needs to surf facebook for 12 hours, then I guess the Air is for you since it's about all it can do, somewhat negating the need for huge battery life IMO.

And it sounds like they are going to keep the 13" air with it's screen from 2003? lolol.

I've got a Macbook Air (2012) and and a Macbook Pro (2013) and i always go for the Air as my every day computer. Infact I'm on it now while my Pro is still in my bag switched off. I just prefer it, it still wows me, how do they fit a computer in there and a battery that lasts so long? The the only time i notice any big performance difference is when I'm ripping DVDs. Add on top the price difference, the 13" Air is much closer to what i think most are willing to pay for a laptop as a lot are use to cheap Windows laptops from Acer.
 
i bought over my Macbook Pro Retina (2013), and my mates thought it was an Air...

It can be passed of as one visually.
 
This is the logical device for the anti-tablet crowd (hi).

This is a nightstand computer, a coffee shop computer. An email, youtube, browsing computer. It's not for CAD renderings and editing movies. If you want to attach a bunch of accessories, this isn't that computer. The concept is ease of use portability, which doesn't entail dragging along your mouse and external hard drives and all your other gadgets. That's not what's going on here.

Amazing how people are fine with no ports on an ipad, but give a slim notebook the same treatment and everyone loses their minds.

I was not fine with no ports on an iPad. Ultimately, I could never figure out the point to it, that I couldn't accomplish more efficiently with either my phone or a computer. It was eternally in a gray zone. My 11" Air already has great ease of use, but it's also highly versatile and able to run Photoshop, Premiere, and anything else in the CC suite. I can use it tethered in a remote location, or have it plugged into a wall during an extended shoot (with my files simultaneously coming into the computer and an external drive).

This computer is severely handicapped, and for no good reason. If I'm working off files on an external (doing initial sorting and editing of video while in a hotel room), and my battery is low, then what? Unplug the external and defeat the whole purpose of even working on the computer?
 
Since USB 3.1 will make this the first Mac laptop to support external 5K displays, I wonder if Apple will finally update the displays too.

This is all good news.

Wrong.

USB 3.1 tops out at 10Gbps. Thunderbolt 2 is 20Gbps and can't support 5K @ 60Hz. We'll need to wait for Thunderbolt 3 / DisplayPort 1.3
 
Wrong.

USB 3.1 tops out at 10Gbps. Thunderbolt 2 is 20Gbps and can't support 5K @ 60Hz. We'll need to wait for Thunderbolt 3 / DisplayPort 1.3

Wrong.

The USB 3.1 connector provides for a side channel which will of course be Thunderbolt 3 / DisplayPort 1.3
 
Is the 11 inch a good buy?

I have considered the 11 inch as an on the go laptop but have not heard great things about the screen size. Thoughts?
 
But what happens when someone/students/visitor arrive with talks/data/photos on a thumb drive EXPECTING you to be able to access them - you know, because EVERY COMPUTER FOR THE LAST 10 YEARS HAS AT LEAST ONE STANDARD USB PORT!

substitute 'floppy disk' for '[usb] thumb drive' about 15-18 years ago.. didn't stop the floppy drive from disappearing. The symmetric, reversible Type C socket even if it wasn't so thin Apple would likely flock to it.

Type C is still a standard. There was more than just Type A before Type C came along.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB#Host_and_device_interface_receptacles

There is going to be a Type A to Type C cable ("adapter"). Given the relative newness of Type C Apple should include one with the computer. It shouldn't be a extra $20 dongle as a healthy majority of folks are probably going to need it.

With Type C on both sides there is no right/wrong end to match and no right/wrong up/down. There is no long trailing legacy infrastructure... but there can be an upside if want to clean out the legacy compromises.


If I go any give a seminar somewhere, sometimes it is a requirement to copy the presentation onto a host computer system (more often than not, just a dumb non-networked laptop). I need to be able to copy over the final version of a talk (normally finished on the flight/train) to a thumb drive and then across to the presentation computer.

In the Apple universe there is Air drop.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AirDrop
http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204144 for iOS
http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202267 for OS X



The notion of the "Cloud" is solely some remote server in a big server farm a 100-1000 miles away isn't necessarily true. It actually is kind of odd Windows hasn't really added something very similar yet. (Android too but the fragmentation there is a bit more problematic). Short range, ad hoc pairings infrastructure is supported in the modern standards ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi_Direct )

But yeah the host presentation computer may be a Windows XP device stuck in the last decade. Many of these presentation projectors have VGA sockets... those got dumped from Mac laptops over a decade ago and people have managed to find solutions.



My point is: There is no need to make a laptop so thin that it can't house a standard USB slot surely?

USB is hardly a large port!

Given the constraints Apple applies the "ever so thin" is a factor in weight. Aluminum case if want a lighter one then it has to get thinner to shed weight. the keyboard and trackpad are driving the length width. The height is a dimension that

I think Apple will use this as an entry point for Type C but I won't be surprised if they roll Type C out to all Macs over time. It is more than just thinness. The utility of the connector is broader than the old legacy types.
 
.. I don't find any need to touch my Mac screen. The way the OS is designed, the trackpad works great!

One, you probably grew up using a mouse and two, for some apps these work even better.

http://www.wacom.com/en-us/products/pen-displays

If touch was present and didn't cost anything more there would be more apps that leveraged it. Because it is expensive most apps don't. OS X doesn't need to go "all touch". Touch is useful without being optimized for touch, just like accelerator keys are useful even if have mouse/trackpad.


......
Touch is becoming affordable, there are very many cheap alternatives that actually run a full operating system. While Windows 8 (and 10 soon) might not be everyones cup of tea there are some serious competitors as compared to Chromebooks.

I think you are bit naive as to why Windows with Bing and the like appear. Those solutions are appearing for Chrome device level priced devices because of Chrome's competitive presence. If not there wouldn't have a healthy economy in that space.

Windows licensing helped kill of netbooks and the like because the percentage of cost Windows consumed ( and the Intel take too) was too high. It sucked quality out of the rest o the components to produce even just small margins.

There is full operating system at the Chromebook foundation. The question is really just how broad of an application base need and how the software is managed and delivered.

Smartphones ( inlcuding phablets) are going to be the largest base of personal computers going forward. Windows isn't going th be the defacto norm anymore. In world wear 20-30% of the folks have only known smartphones las their first OS touch is going to be significant. That is one of the reasons why Windows is moving that way. Apple doesn't particularly care since they will likely track most of those folks into iOS devices (and never get to OS X ones ). OS X has and will likely continue to have sub 10% of the overall personal computer market. Apple isn't going to break out of that, nor do they particularly care to.



However, I like your perspective of looking at something that I normally wouldn't consider but I would still advise for cheaper alternatives (HP Stream 11 for instance) that can have more functional use.

Cheaper up front costs. But managing a herd of "you can install anything" computer has a different total cost of ownership than ones where normal users can't install anything.
 
My prediction: This will be a low price ARM OS X netbook that only runs apps from the App Store. No third-party apps, no Intel emulation, just apps recompiled for an ARM port of OS X and sold through the App Store.

ARM (an "A8X" or whatever Apple variant) would let Apple get their own price down to tablet levels. It would also help them lock down the machine similar to the way they do with iOS devices so Apple can focus on profit from apps, media, and iCloud services in their walled garden. With family sharing and a low hardware price, it would make this the logical choice for family members without desktop computing demands, or for a lightweight spare machine from people who are primarily desktop users.

It would be a play similar to Google's Chromebooks, but with much more credible apps.
 
Who even buys the MBA when they could buy a 13" retina pro? It's not like the rMBP isn't ultra-portable or doesn't have a great battery life already.

Sure the MBA might be a little lighter with a little better battery but it comes at an enormous performance cost. I mean I guess if you are a die-hard Starbucks dweller who needs to surf facebook for 12 hours, then I guess the Air is for you since it's about all it can do, somewhat negating the need for huge battery life IMO.

And it sounds like they are going to keep the 13" air with it's screen from 2003? lolol.

The rMBP screen is also way better, both in resolution and in color quality.

----------


Even if you somehow end up in a room where everyone has a new Mac, it probably won't work. I've never used AirDrop successfully at school. I think it tries to send the data over LAN if both parties are on the same wifi network, failing to fall back to a different method if the school blocks communication over LAN (as many school and work wifi networks do). People still transfer things with flash drives because it's the only way that works 100% of the time.
 
I have to chime in a reiterate what many of you have already said...

REDUCE THE SCREEN BEZEL, PLEASE!

If Dell's XPS 13 (2015 Broadwell model) can reduce it to 5mm, Apple surely can do that or better.

And give us a MacBook Air 15" too. If Apple can justify PLUS-sized mobile phones, it surely can justify a decent screen size for an ultra-portable. (And yes, you nay-sayers, a 15" is still "portable" for some of us!)
 
When you say "who even buys the MBA", I am just wondering what exactly you imagine 95% of the computer buying public do with their laptops? Specifically, what are the limitations of an MBA that make it such a bad deal for these users. The MBA is an incredibly popular laptop. It is priced $300 below the entry rMBP, and many folks just don't need or care about the difference in capability.

95% of people sit at Starbucks posting on Facebook. Still, for that $300 extra, you get WAY more machine and it's not any less portable than the Air. Honestly Apple should be ashamed to sell that computer with the screen that it has in 2015. That alone is worth $300 and is reason enough to not buy the MBA and vote with the wallet so Apple gets the hint it's time to step it up a bit. But as long as people buy severely outdated tech at the same prices, Apple isn't going to have any incentive to make better hardware.

The biggest issue with the Air is that it just flat out isn't worth the money. I had a Rev. B MBA and it was total junk, unloaded it not long after buying it because it was pinwheel city, and I paid something close to $2k for it. $1000 for something that will barely run in a couple years, or $1300 for the retina pro that will still chug along like it's brand new in 5-6 years. The $300 difference is a no brainer IMO.

Don't get me wrong, the MBA is a novel idea and I'd like to see some cool stuff come out of it from Apple, but when Apple unveiled it the big deal about it was that it was a full-fledged computer, but that simply wasn't the case because the hardware was so weak. Now with this 12" Air, it's most definitely shaping up to NOT be a full blown computer, which completely defeats the purpose altogether and is very Microsoft-esque.
 
I suspect Apple has traded higher display/GPU power consumption for lower components elsewhere ( better CPU , chipset, lower power radio infrastructure, lack of fan power draw , etc. ). This new model is probably in similar battery lifetime range as 'old' MBA 11" is now.


Power is in the good enough range if not looking for laptop to serve as charging dock for other battery powered (or just bus powered ) devices.

I think the "good enough range" as you put it is the key. We aren't talking about the extreme usage scenario for a mass market device. We need to focus on normal usage and the spikes in normal usage. Once a laptop has reached a certain level, the battery life is good enough. Example. I frequently bring my laptop to a coffee shop to work on the weekends. My last laptop was an HP Specter, purchased in early 2013. Slim, sleek, relatively light weight. But it got a little more than 3.5 hours of usage doing word processing, emailing, surfing the web, and a bit of Excel. So I could go to the coffee shop and have lunch while working and kill the battery in one sitting necessitating a return home for recharge. It wasn't a big deal, but it was an issue to work around.

My current laptop, purchased in late 2014, gets a battery life I have no idea what it is. It estimates 13 hours if I set it at eco boost. I don't know if this accurate. I will never put in enough hours in a 24 hour period to figure this out. If I have to put in a 20 hour day, I will be either at the office (and plugged in) or at home (and plugged in). If I'm traveling, I won't actually be able to work on a laptop while I'm in cabs, waiting on security line, or boarding air planes. I'm sure I won't ever have to (A) do a 16 hour flight and (B) have to work on my laptop during most of it. I also have an iPad which would be with me on any long flight and would provide recreational usage for nearly 10 hours.

There is a point where battery life becomes irrelevant for most usage. Yes, there are folks who use their laptop as their big battery to recharge their phones. Those phones are not iPhone 6s because you will either get all day life from your iPhone 6 or you will get all day life from your current modern laptop. You can't, in any normal usage, be actively using both devices so much that you kill their battery in one day (one major exception, you are using your iPhone as a hot spot to run your laptop). Apple should design and market its laptops under the assumption that the user will have a modern smartphone (iPhone 5s at least) and/or an iPad with them. It is a fairly safe assumption I suspect. So while battery life is key, they don't need to assume that this will be your one and only device over a 12 hour period (in which you don't have your power cord).

I hope Apple kept the goal of liberation from battery life in mind when it made the next Macbook Air. But it doesn't have to go to extremes for the M Air. The M Pro is the space for the more hardcore mission critical stuff. That differentiates the two lines in meaningful ways. And you have to admit the lines were not well distinguished in the last two years. The price point was too close, the performance was too close and the form factor was too close.

----------

My prediction: This will be a low price ARM OS X netbook that only runs apps from the App Store. No third-party apps, no Intel emulation, just apps recompiled for an ARM port of OS X and sold through the App Store.

ARM (an "A8X" or whatever Apple variant) would let Apple get their own price down to tablet levels. It would also help them lock down the machine similar to the way they do with iOS devices so Apple can focus on profit from apps, media, and iCloud services in their walled garden. With family sharing and a low hardware price, it would make this the logical choice for family members without desktop computing demands, or for a lightweight spare machine from people who are primarily desktop users.

It would be a play similar to Google's Chromebooks, but with much more credible apps.

I think you are a year or two away from this case. Way too confusing to sell a laptop that isn't OS X at this stage. Once iOS and ARM is powerful enough, this could happen. But not in 2015. Or 2016 for that matter.
 
95% of people sit at Starbucks posting on Facebook. Still, for that $300 extra, you get WAY more machine and it's not any less portable than the Air. Honestly Apple should be ashamed to sell that computer with the screen that it has in 2015. That alone is worth $300 and is reason enough to not buy the MBA and vote with the wallet so Apple gets the hint it's time to step it up a bit. But as long as people buy severely outdated tech at the same prices, Apple isn't going to have any incentive to make better hardware.

The biggest issue with the Air is that it just flat out isn't worth the money. I had a Rev. B MBA and it was total junk, unloaded it not long after buying it because it was pinwheel city, and I paid something close to $2k for it. $1000 for something that will barely run in a couple years, or $1300 for the retina pro that will still chug along like it's brand new in 5-6 years. The $300 difference is a no brainer IMO.

Don't get me wrong, the MBA is a novel idea and I'd like to see some cool stuff come out of it from Apple, but when Apple unveiled it the big deal about it was that it was a full-fledged computer, but that simply wasn't the case because the hardware was so weak. Now with this 12" Air, it's most definitely shaping up to NOT be a full blown computer, which completely defeats the purpose altogether and is very Microsoft-esque.

Honestly, you are completely overlaying your needs and values on every other computer user and saying the MBA isn't worth the money when millions and millions of people buy and happily use these computers everyday for both personal and professional purposes. A lightweight portable MBA that has long battery life and cost $300 less than a rMBP is not the trade-off that you would make, but it is reasonable trade-off for many folks.

People use their MBAs to do far more than just browse Facebook at Starbucks, and it is absurd to imply that is all these computers can do. I have used my MBA professionally for years to develop presentations, perform financial analysis, download corporate data, write lengthy reports, and communicate with associates. I work with numerous colleagues that use their MBAs in a similar fashion. My daughter uses her MBA exclusively for college assignment, analysis, and reports.

I guess you had a bad experience with an early vintage MBA, and that's unfortunate. If you prefer the rMBP, that's fine. I just don't understand the slanted negative perspective, and MBA sales plus customer satisfaction ratings really don't support your narrow viewpoint.
 
Apple has officially declared war against anything that is not in the Apple Eco System.


Wanna plug in a USB drive? Noo. get iCloud

Wanna plug your laptop to your TV?? NO, get Apple TV!

How soon will Apple get rid of headphone jacket in the name of "thinness" so you are forced to buy Beat headphone that only works wihtin Apple eco system?
 
95% of people sit at Starbucks posting on Facebook. Still, for that $300 extra, you get WAY more machine and it's not any less portable than the Air. Honestly Apple should be ashamed to sell that computer with the screen that it has in 2015. That alone is worth $300 and is reason enough to not buy the MBA and vote with the wallet so Apple gets the hint it's time to step it up a bit. But as long as people buy severely outdated tech at the same prices, Apple isn't going to have any incentive to make better hardware.

The biggest issue with the Air is that it just flat out isn't worth the money. I had a Rev. B MBA and it was total junk, unloaded it not long after buying it because it was pinwheel city, and I paid something close to $2k for it. $1000 for something that will barely run in a couple years, or $1300 for the retina pro that will still chug along like it's brand new in 5-6 years. The $300 difference is a no brainer IMO.

Don't get me wrong, the MBA is a novel idea and I'd like to see some cool stuff come out of it from Apple, but when Apple unveiled it the big deal about it was that it was a full-fledged computer, but that simply wasn't the case because the hardware was so weak. Now with this 12" Air, it's most definitely shaping up to NOT be a full blown computer, which completely defeats the purpose altogether and is very Microsoft-esque.


What you said in Bold is a blatant lie, the Macbook pro is thicker and heavier. It is less portable. I am on owner of a 13" rMBP and a 13" MBA. I use both of them most days. and the air is far more portable.

I use both of these computers everyday. However, I use the rMBP far more often because I often times need the display for doing video work, or just the extra CPU/GPU power. However, I very strongly believe that the MacBook air is a way better buy far the vast majority of consumers and professionals. One major area where is lacks is in the display.

Therefore this new macbook is going to be a very important notebook, I am very much looking forward to it, however It won't be the ideal notebook for me, as I have testes Core M. and It is fantastic and moving in the right direction, just doesn't have the GPU power I require most of the time.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.