When did it stop being called MacOS?
I'm pretty sure my first iMac shipped with Mac OS 8
Is the rebranding just taking out the space?
Said who?
Seriously though, if OS X is 'replaced' with macOS won't that cause a problem in 2017 with macOS 2.0? (As there as already been Mac OS 2).
While we're at it, why does watchOS get a proper version number (1.0 on release, then 2.0 at WWDC) but the first version of tvOS seem to have been 9.0?
I think it's because tvOS is a branch of iOS, and will probably still continue to get iOS code merged into it.. WatchOS is probably a bit more it's own optimized OS, because of its tiny hardware resources
Software version numbers don't follow decimal math. Didn't we already have this discussion when Yosemite came out?Correct me if I'm wrong, but after 10.9, should come 11?
I honestly couldn't care less. It's the same OS and it works the same. Come on.
iOS will be the odd one out if they do. Will mobileOS be next?
I don't care, as long as it doesn't continue as 10.11, 10.12, 10.13. They don't make sense decimal places, or as version naming. I see people typing 10.11 as 10.1 because they don't know the difference. Whichever one Apple Wants:
- macOS 11
- Macintosh OS 11
- Mac OS 11
For the love of Pete. OS X or macOS. Don't rebrand it as MacOS. It follows zero capitalization standards for the brand.
It makes sense for them to unify the names.
Since they were meant to go to 11.0 last year, and didn't, they should rebrand and remove the X - so a yes from me.
I don't care, as long as it doesn't continue as 10.11, 10.12, 10.13. They don't make sense decimal places, or as version naming. I see people typing 10.11 as 10.1 because they don't know the difference. Whichever one Apple Wants:
- macOS 11
- Macintosh OS 11
- Mac OS 11
Correct me if I'm wrong, but after 10.9, should come 11?
Yeah, it's been a hit with the Romans, and a huge help differentiating between all the people still using earlier systems.
I've called it "MacOS (Insert pretty picture here)" for a long time.
Those would be: "MacOS-Rushed to Market", "MacOS-Sadly Disappointing", and "MacOS-Should Still Be Beta"?So many folks called it... I don't care what they call it, as long as it "just works" and isn't full of cranky bugs and such as the last 3 OS have been.
Seen what happens when you move away from the Big Cat names(just kidding. I know there were problems there too.)
I've never been to kindergarten, but I was born back in MCML, when it was common not to go.Anyone who went to Kindergarten can read Roman numerals lol
Pedantry is a difficult habit to shake.Software version numbers don't follow decimal math. Didn't we already have this discussion when Yosemite came out?
Those would be: "MacOS-Rushed to Market", "MacOS-Sadly Disappointing", and "MacOS-Should Still Be Beta"?
Maybe they could start picking bugs and use their portraits: MacOS Cockroach, MacOS Borer Beetle, MacOS Carpenter Ant, MacOS Bedbug. The Bugs are endless, kind of like the Mac OS these days.
[doublepost=1460677123][/doublepost]I've never been to kindergarten, but I was born back in MCML, when it was common not to go.
Yes, but those ".1" versions usually indicate crappy little upgrades, not major.....OH MY GOSH, are we really still having this discussion in 2016?! It is not the decimal system. It is versioning and Apple does it just like everyone else does. Educate yourselves people.
Get off my lawn!You are clearly too old to be using computers anyway so this doesn't apply to you. May I suggest a nice lawn to stand on and shout from?
For the love of Pete. OS X or macOS. Don't rebrand it as MacOS. It follows zero capitalization standards for the brand.