Please don't make it generative or degenerative, but actually something useful and more into summaries and usefulness
You mean the stock price will fall further behindSays who?
Of course he promises that because if don’t they will fall further behind.
Apple is very arrogant when it comes to negotiations and OpenAI doesn‘t need Apple.We built a very robust AI service using the OpenAI LLM via their API. It took less than two weeks working part time and is extremely good. Apple has orders of magnitude more engineers than we do — it's not *that* hard for good engineers. They're probably negotiating costs, token volume, SLAs, etc. They may even have deeply technical and mature POCs already and just discussing scale, etc.
A lot of that $3T came from giant payments from Google just to make their search engine the default and Apple had to do nothing. Making their AI partner the default for Siri is probably worth another trillion dollars for Apple and they won't to do that much. Doesn't sound like mess to any company or shareholder that values revenue and profits.Pathetic effort by Apple. 3 TB company can’t build their own LLM? Instead Tim Cook all in on the failed Vision Pro. What a mess.
A lot of that $3T came from giant payments from Google just to make their search engine the default and Apple had to do nothing. Making their AI partner the default for Siri is probably worth another trillion dollars for Apple and they won't to do that much. Doesn't sound like mess to any company or shareholder that values revenue and profits.
So what does a $3T company do? It has no cloud and no data. It develops a VR headset and fails. It doesn‘t fix Siri for a decade, ignoring generative AI. And in the end it realizes that it will fail, if it doesn‘t integrate this technology in its products and desperately tries to license and buy this technoloogy from other companies.I'm no software developer but given that iOS 18 will be in the public's hands in less than six months, I'd guess that if Apple are still contemplating license agreements and core technologies then they might be cutting it a bit fine 😆
Nothing of that $3T comes from Google. That’s market cap, not revenue. And even then, it’s not a big part of it.A lot of that $3T came from giant payments from Google just to make their search engine the default and Apple had to do nothing. Making their AI partner the default for Siri is probably worth another trillion dollars for Apple and they won't to do that much. Doesn't sound like mess to any company or shareholder that values revenue and profits.
Cloud and data have nothing to do with Apple’s business model. So I don’t see why Apple should invest in that, more than as an enabler for user-oriented features.So what does a $3T company do? It has no cloud and no data. It develops a VR headset and fails. It doesn‘t fix Siri for a decade, ignoring generative AI. And in the end it realizes that it will fail, if it doesn‘t integrate this technology in its products and desperately tries to license and buy this technoloogy from other companies.
Shame on you Apple.
"Here's what I found on the web for No Cheetos Cool Essays"Don’t need generative AI in the system. I need Siri to understand what I mean and be able to do it. I’m trying to use my phone more efficiently, not cheat on school essays.
It’ll be free but almost 100% you’ll have to upgrade to 16 Pros to get itWhat I hope Apple will announce:
- On-device gen AI: free
- Apple's Cloud-based gen AI: included with iCloud+
- Support for third party gen AI, such as Google, Meta, and OpenAI
A lot of tech in iPhones isn’t Apple’s own tech, but comes from suppliers, and a lot of what is Apple's own tech actually comes from acquisitions of small innovative companies. They can't buy OpenAI or Google, so they have to use them as suppliers.It’s a complete disgrace that Apple doesn’t have their own tech to use here.
Cause that is where all the tech is moving to? And Apple claimed itself it wanted to turn into a service company. For Apple TV, Apple Music, AI you need cloud infrastructure and huge datacenter.Cloud and data have nothing to do with Apple’s business model. So I don’t see why Apple should invest in that, more than as an enabler for user-oriented features.
Valid point I was thinking more of all the stuff out there, not my own.I hope not. I don’t want my iCloud contents to be used for training GPT.
you have already. When you select text in a photo, copy subject it is AI. When you take a photo you use tiny smartphone camera lenses + AI. Also Siri is somehow and a very bad AI. When you use Instagram or other app, there is an AI system working in the background that decides, what you‘re gonna see next.I don’t need AI in my phone.