Should Crazy Eye be removed then?
http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=284827332&mt=8
or More Cowbell?
http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=285559215&mt=8
This app looks a lot better than some of the crap on the app store. For instance, ezone.com's Crazy Metal Head, which is just a metal skull that costs 99 cents and lets you use your finger to move the jaw up and down. Apple either needs to implement these standards across the board or not at all. They can't have it both ways. Half the apps in the store are crap anyway.
Control the hardware.
Control the operating system.
Control the software.
Control the......
![]()
i agree bad precedent
let the consumers decide what apps should be used as long as it fits the sdk requirements
he has a right to sell it.
First we complain about the **** apps in the store then when Apple decides to do something about by cutting out the useless apps people complain, probably the same ones. And to the ones who say they would PAY for it... that is BS. If that app made it to the store and had a price you would bitch about it. Grow up. The store was not made for grade school prank apps. Go Apple for taking care of this problem.![]()
Agreed. There simply is a segment of people in society that will rush to defend any idea that is challenged by the "system."
Bottom line: Apple owns the application store; it can allow or forbid any application it wants for any reason.
How can judging the utility of an app be anything but subjective? What about an app for keeping track of how many days it's been since your accordion was tuned? Or an app that helps you identify different types of accordions? Limited utility, or not?
I don't think people disagree with this. That's not the problem.
I have no problem if Apple decides it wants to specifically ban all fart-related apps. That's fine. Just say it if that's why.
But how many hours/days/weeks are you going to put into an app when it can be blocked for vague reasons only after you're done. "limited utility."
arn
Your app is total crap.
Apple doesn't want it in their store
I don't want it in their store
Get over it!!
I can understand Apple's decision. If left unmanaged, the app store could easily become overrun with useless apps, and cluttered to the point where finding useful apps becomes tedious. This could affect overall sales, as well as punish the developers who's apps were created with significant amounts of time and resources.
Besides, I think a clear distinction can be made between apps like koi pond and others of "limited utility" like pull-my-finger, whoopee-cushion, and the infamous I Am Rich.