BGil said:Exactly. Up until now (or when Vista comes out next year) Apple has dominated the music and print domains because of superior technology. They won't have that after Vista is released.
Apple had the same kind of lead in video and film production up until Windows 2000 showed up and since then Microsoft has started winning that area. Avid and Adobe barely spend any development dollars on the Mac platform anymore (in video/film). It's a shame that all Avid High-def systems only run on Windows now when they all used to be Mac based.
Digidesign (part of Avid now) has been moving more towards Windows every year. IIRC their new Pro Tools Venue systems run on XP only and Pro Tools is supposed to be superior on Windows now.
I think the same will probably happen in music and print now too.
The reason Adobe and Avid aren't spending any money on the Mac platform is because they are having too much trouble competing with Final Cut Pro, which is good enough for most video and film production work (ever see *Cold Mountain*?) and much cheaper than the equivalent product from Avid. By the way - why are you distinguishing XP 64 from XP? It's pretty much the same OS. There are significant changes between XP and 2003, but 2003 is purely a server OS, and at $999 not to many people are likely to buy it for desktop systems - it's a hint at what Vista will be like (without the kinds of applications that one would expect on a desktop system, and without the new rendering engine), but I don't think it counts as a step in the desktop system analogous to Jaguar/Panther/Tiger.