Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Clearly I didn't mean to push out the fix just to beta, but to beta as well as to the release versions given that patching a beta is generally an even simpler thing (unless perhaps they are close to being done with another build and would just put the patch there).
Got it. However, in urgent cases like this I think they should not spend even a minute on updating beta versions as long as there are still vulnerable release products (OS X Mavericks) out there ...
 
Got it. However, in urgent cases like this I think they should not spend even a minute on updating beta versions as long as there are still vulnerable release products (OS X Mavericks) out there ...
Sure, not at the cost of publicly released products. However the team that would do it for Mac OS would be different than the one that would do it for iOS, so it's not likely one would interfere with the other. Let's hope they patch all of the affected software/products much sooner than later.
 
Love how Apple updates their software so often. iOS 7 is only getting better and better...fix the bugs first before adding a bunch of new features.

Yeah..it's like being handed a $20 bill...except a nickel at a time. If they take any longer bringing out .1 updates, they can start introducing new iPhone models with each .1 update.
 
I'm kinda of sick of people saying they were forced on to iOS 7. No you wern't, to get iOS 7 you had to go into settings and check to see if the current iOS you were running was up to date, then you were asked if you wanted to download iOS 7, then you were asked if you agreed to the T&C's, then you were asked to press install.

You all made a choice, that choice may have came back and bitten a few people but just because you can't go back on it then it doesn't mean that you wern't given a choice. The fact is that most people on here actually sat waiting for iOS 7 to be released despite some developers saying they wouldn't update straight away, some of you even went out of your way to become a developer to get BETA versions of iOS 7 and complained when it didn't run like a complete OS.
 
I think you are exaggerating a bit. What issue are you referring to? Is it the tab issue on the Air's? I've heard if you have a few tabs open, it crashes. Regardless, this hasn't stopped others from using their Air.

If so, you can always download 7.1 Beta 5 right now. Guides are online on how to do so.

Yes, the tab issue. Except it's not when I have multiples open, Safari just crashes constantly to the home screen. I shouldn't have to install beta software to use my Air.
 
Vpn?

So would vpn eliminate the vulnerability? I updated iOS but the Mac I intend to buy will have mavericks
 
I think Apple changed iOS, so who if we don't have VVM it doesn't even show the icon for it anymore.
 
Does this affect you if your still on iOS6? or is this for iOS7 only.
Yes, it does affect iOS 6.

----------

So would vpn eliminate the vulnerability? I updated iOS but the Mac I intend to buy will have mavericks
VPN protects from the most likely exploit (in an unsecure Wifi network), but does not completely remove the vulnerability (since an attacker could in theory intercept your traffic after the VPN tunnel, i.e. between the VPN gateway and the server).
I updated iOS but the Mac I intend to buy will have mavericks
This bug will be fixed within days.
 
Are you sure?? I don't want iOS7 on my iPhone 5.
The article talks about iOS 6.1.6 being released to address this issue for devices that support it but don't support iOS 7. So in the case of iPhone 4 it would seem you are almost forced to go with iOS 7 to get this fix, which is kind of unfortunate for some I'm sure.
 
Um, No, there is an update for iOS 6.

Wrong sir. If you have a device running iOS 6 but is capable of running iOS 7, your only choices are to update to iOS 7.0.6 or stay on whatever version of iOS 6 you are on and have this large security issue that was recently patched. People on iOS 6 with an iOS 7 capable device can't update to iOS 6.1.6. Apple won't allow it.
 
I just did a full iTunes, not an OTA update on my 5.

One thing I haven't seen mentioned it that the process helped reclaim about 200MB of "Other" space.

And it did turn on BT, like others have mentioned.
 
Well...what a perfect way for Apple to get 100% pretty color graph showing everyone is now on iOS7.

hmmmm...makes you think about it huh???

Why not just release a separate update for iOS6 users only?
 
Well...what a perfect way for Apple to get 100% pretty color graph showing everyone is now on iOS7.

hmmmm...makes you think about it huh???

Why not just release a separate update for iOS6 users only?
They did, just not for those devices that support iOS 7.
 
This affects iOS 6. Do you consider that half baked software?

That's a good question. I want to give it careful consideration before giving you a final response. I was very pleased with iOS 5. It slowed my device down a little. The insanely great new features made the tradeoff a good one.

iOS 6 gave back the speed I enjoyed with OS 4.x. That device is protected as it is deemed worthy of 6.1.6. My iPad mini on the other hand is not. It may become a stay-at-home thin light portable wireless device.

The news of the SSL bug is fairly new to us unwashed. I will continue to check apple.com. If Cook issues a full page apology along with the ceremonial sacrificial head on a platter the answer will be obvious.

Absent that I guess we will need to determine that Maps was the most egregious thing ever to come from Apple. If Maps [which of course is flawless now] is the worst of the worst then I may have to conclude that iOS 6 lacked sufficient time in the oven.

Tomorrow is Monday and Steve's birthday. TC is a class act. February 24 is a good day to issue that apology. Waiting until the first business day of the week is only fair, don't you think?

I am primarily a Mac user and as such only one of TC's stepchildren. No patch for OS X presently.
 
This actually is a pretty major security issue. In some cases, connections that were secured using TLS (aka SSL, used by HTTPS web browsers and many other apps) did not actually check whether the certificate provided by the server actually matched the server's name. In effect it trusts any certificate that is valid for any site (issued by a real certificate authority and not expired). For example, foo.com using a valid certificate for foo.com could pretend to be gmail.com and iOS would just say OK sounds good! A malicious (or curious) ISP/DNS provider/Mobile carrier/wireless hotspot/etc could pretend to be gmail.com (or any other destination) and silently read (or modify) everyone's encrypted traffic.

Finally. Here I was reading all these comments about point release number semantics, not bricked phones, updating apps over wifi, and I'm going... Isn't this like a major security issue?

On page six someone bothered to outline the issue in one paragraph.

Thank you.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.