Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Xray50

macrumors newbie
Nov 2, 2017
29
8
Puebla, Mexico
I know everybody is talking about Spectre and Meltdown and don't care about El Capitan or Sierra...

But did you noticed

Apple changed El Capitan Security update 2017-005 date?
https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1945?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US

Before this results in a boot loop when updating from build 15G17023.
Furthermore the date published on that website as July 19, 2017

And now Apple change the date: Dec 6, 2017

Someone knows if they add something new to this patch?
And If its working now if you download from that link?

Tc
 
  • Like
Reactions: camelia

chrfr

macrumors G5
Jul 11, 2009
13,523
7,047
I know everybody is talking about Spectre and Meltdown and don't care about El Capitan or Sierra...

But did you noticed

Apple changed El Capitan Security update 2017-005 date?
https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1945?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US

Before this results in a boot loop when updating from build 15G17023.
Furthermore the date published on that website as July 19, 2017

And now Apple change the date: Dec 6, 2017

Someone knows if they add something new to this patch?
And If its working now if you download from that link?

Tc
December 6 is when the update was originally released. Apple had replaced Security update 2017-004 at the same URL with 2017-005 and failed to change the modification date.
 

jerwin

Suspended
Jun 13, 2015
2,895
4,651
Benchmarking the differences between macOS 10.13.2 (17C88) and (17C205) with Geekbench v4.20 made Supplemental's performance look just fine (less than 1% computing performance difference).

Unfortunately, according to Blackmagic's Disk Speed test, my MacPro-2013's PCI-based SSD device has lost more that half of it's write performance under Supplemental (17C205). This is truly unfortunate, as this poor little cylinder was bought to quickly plow thru data. It no longer can write fast enough to keep up with it's workload output.

Eww-- this is probably going to set Final Cut Pro back by a fair margin.
 

ouragan

macrumors newbie
Aug 2, 2016
18
3

GalileoSeven

macrumors 6502a
Jan 3, 2015
597
826
Install times notwithstanding, the scattered reports of problems actually installing this supplemental update has me hesitant. Is this really safe to d/l and try and install at the moment?
 

flowrider

macrumors 604
Nov 23, 2012
7,241
2,966
^^^^I do "actual" work in PS CS6. Don't use Chrome. One monitor is plenty for me.

Lou
 

sovereign

macrumors 6502
Feb 13, 2009
271
121
Install times notwithstanding, the scattered reports of problems actually installing this supplemental update has me hesitant. Is this really safe to d/l and try and install at the moment?

Just updated a 2011 iMac and 2016 MBP 15". @10 minutes to install each and no stalling.
 

SDAVE

macrumors 68040
Jun 16, 2007
3,574
601
Nowhere
^^^^I do "actual" work in PS CS6. Don't use Chrome. One monitor is plenty for me.

Lou

Ok try using PS CC2018, Chrome and any other application that uses the GPU.

High Sierra is useless with nVidia GPUs in a real working environment.
 

adnbek

macrumors 68000
Oct 22, 2011
1,581
549
Montreal, Quebec
Is it normal my boot screen (with the progress bar when the OS is loading) is now grey instead of black on the 5k iMac (2015) after this update?
 

flowrider

macrumors 604
Nov 23, 2012
7,241
2,966
^^^^Hmm, it should be gray (grey). I don't ever remember having a black boot screen, but I'm old and feeble:oops:

What color is the Apple above the progress bar?

Lou
 

adnbek

macrumors 68000
Oct 22, 2011
1,581
549
Montreal, Quebec
^^^^Hmm, it should be gray (grey). I don't ever remember having a black boot screen, but I'm old and feeble:oops:

What color is the Apple above the progress bar?

Lou

For some new Macs, now it’s black. (White Apple logo, white progress bar, see attachment as an example)

But after this update, the background went from black to a darkish grey. Same white logo and progress bar, except no longer a deep black background.

EDIT: Fixed it by reinstalling the update using the standalone installer. Now back to normal. And my error, in High Sierra it boots with your desktop background in the background, not the black screen from Sierra and prior.
 

Attachments

  • 912E63BD-ADE9-451D-BDA1-7B272C515C5A.jpeg
    912E63BD-ADE9-451D-BDA1-7B272C515C5A.jpeg
    6.3 KB · Views: 110
Last edited:

mydlowec

macrumors newbie
Jan 11, 2018
1
0
I have a 2 year old MBP 11,5 with 2.5GHz i7 and 16GB of RAM. Installed the update and now when I try to watch an HD video, I get severe frame skipping. If I had known this would happen, I wouldn't have installed the update. Anyone who tells you there is no performance impact does not know what they're talking about.
 

camelia

macrumors 6502a
Apr 3, 2015
698
120
Mexico City
Last edited:

tywebb13

macrumors 68030
Apr 21, 2012
2,948
1,636
6 or 7 installers for the supplemental update?
Which one is missing? :eek::eek::eek:

Thanks
Came

Nothing is missing.

iMac Pro gets macos brain which no other mac gets. iMac Pro gets 7 components.

Other macs get bridge os brain and bridge os update customer which iMac Pro does not get. Other macs get 6 components.

What is unusual is that only the iMac Pro gets a firmware update and embedded os firmware whereas other macs did not get those.

It has been usual for all macs to get a firmware update for every macos update since 10.10.2. Sometimes it installs and sometimes it doesn’t. But there has always been an associated firmware update since 10.10.2.

Anyway now that apple have combined these components into a single installer on their downloads page I don’t think we need to concern ourselves with how many components there are. The only thing to discern is which one to install.

Use https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1951?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US for macs other than iMac Pro and use https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1950?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US for iMac Pro. That is all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: camelia

Smacky

macrumors 6502
Jul 23, 2008
456
5
On my iMac (27" late 2013)

Before:
Single score 4275
Multi score 12570

After:
Single score 4264 (-0.26%)
Multi score 12589 (+0.15%)
[doublepost=1515831994][/doublepost]On my MBP (13" Mid 2017)

Before:
Single score 4229
Multi score 9071

After:
Single score 4347 (+2.79%)
Multi score 8946 (-1.39%)
 

osplo

macrumors 6502
Nov 1, 2008
342
184
On my iMac (27" late 2013)

Before:
Single score 4275
Multi score 12570

Pretty similar results here, minimal GeekBench impact, no impact on SSD speed.

iMac 27 inch late 2012

Before:
Single score 4076
Multi score 13589

After:
Single score 4066
Multi score 13585
 

Mainyehc

macrumors 6502a
Mar 14, 2004
864
419
Lisbon, Portugal
Leave it alone..the progress bar will finally give you a countdown during the last 18 minutes. Seems like it took 25 minutes or so to complete here.

That is some downright crappy UX. Just when Apple installers were getting slightly better at calculating the time remaining… I still remember when they came up with a fake splash screen progress bar in Tiger: https://daringfireball.net/misc/2005/04/tiger_details#waitingforloginwindow

Why couldn't they come up with a solution like that for these installers? Some semblance of progress, fake or inaccurate as it may be, is better than no [apparent] progress… Also, why did they get rid of the indeterminate progress bars? They should definitely revisit the concept, IMHO.
 

UL2RA

Suspended
May 7, 2017
999
1,617
After doing exactly as you instructed I'm still experiencing a very slow mac and app s are freezing. Its strange as others don't appear to be encountering this issue. It was running perfectly we'll before applying the update. It was runnuing smooth, no lag, no freezing, no issues whatsoever.

Edit: Found this issue, iStat Menu was indicating 100% of my 32GB of RAM was being used. So I checked Activity monitor and the problem is with an application called Qsync, which syncs file with my QNAP NAS. I quit the process and everything is working fine.
I always forget to recommend looking in the Activity Monitor, but I'm glad you figured it out.
 

bopajuice

Suspended
Mar 22, 2016
1,571
4,348
Dark side of the moon
What I am wondering is has the issue been addressed with new hardware manufacturers are selling now? In other words if I buy a new computer tomorrow is it going to need the same software fix?

Has there been any word on what is going to happen moving forward? Is it a production issue?
 

chrfr

macrumors G5
Jul 11, 2009
13,523
7,047
What I am wondering is has the issue been addressed with new hardware manufacturers are selling now? In other words if I buy a new computer tomorrow is it going to need the same software fix?

Has there been any word on what is going to happen moving forward? Is it a production issue?
We’re years away from new processors which don’t have this vulnerability.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.