6A299b here too! Confused.I put my AirPod Pro 2 on my charger all night and I still have 6A299b, so no 6A301.
6A299b here too! Confused.I put my AirPod Pro 2 on my charger all night and I still have 6A299b, so no 6A301.
The AirPods Pro do not stay connected through Bluetooth to download the firmware while on a charger.
It usually does in the past for other firmware.
Does it require iOS 17?
Ah, that might make the difference.I don't think they require iOS 17 for the firmware update because my AirPods 2 updated to 6A300 while my iPhone was on 16.6
I am wondering if you missed the part of my post where I said, "I am not buying them in foreseeable future, but I am excited to see what they become and if they can deliver on their potential I will."?The Apple Watch demonstrated its purpose when it was announced. Actually, several functions from taking calls and managing notifications handsfree to tracking fitness. I bought one a couple months after it came out, and still have one today.
There’s no such value in a Vision Pro. There’s nothing valuable it can do that other existing products on the market today can’t do. It’s a solution in search of a problem.
I suggest connecting them to your desktop or laptop. I had the same issue then connected them to my laptop and within five minutes I had 6A301. The same was true for my wife's AirPods.6A299b here too! Confused.
This has been with the Case connected to my MBA for an hour. I will try it again today after a few days’ wait. 🤞🏻I suggest connecting them to your desktop or laptop. I had the same issue then connected them to my laptop and within five minutes I had 6A301. The same was true for my wife's AirPods.
No, I'm not trying to be adversarial. I'm aware that it will be the only playback device for spatial videos. I just don't think there's much value in that functionality and I doubt most people will pay $3000 for it. In due time, perhaps the price will change, and currency will inflate to make that price more palatable. But it's still a lot of money to spend on a product that simply provides virtually no more value than you can get out of a $500 TV and a $180 Apple TV or cheaper set-top box.I am wondering if you missed the part of my post where I said, "I am not buying them in foreseeable future, but I am excited to see what they become and if they can deliver on their potential I will."?
Perhaps you should read the article MacRumors published today (9/16) about spatial video, iPhone 15 and Vision Pro and tell me if that is something you can do elsewhere with existing hardware.
Did your watch do then what it does now? Has it not evolved in software and hardware to perform functions that it did not when released? Did the software, both Apple's OS and developer apps released include all the possibilities that would come to pass eight generations later? Did it take off at its initial release? Many times a new product, especially one that introduces new technology, starts out as a better way of doing or combining existing tasks and doing so more efficiently while it evolves.
The name of the product is very apt. "Vision Pro," it requires vision and patience to develop and realize its potential. It clearly does things no existing product does.
They unquestionably have purpose. Some was demonstrated in their slick intro video and most will develop in the future. In the history of technology there are untold numbers of cases that mimic what I believe Apple hopes will happen here.
Be patient and have vision.
Smashing!I simply plugged my APP2s into the Hadron Collider and they updated immediately.
While some disagreement remains, I appreciate your reply and more detailed explanation of your thoughts. Thank you.No, I'm not trying to be adversarial. I'm aware that it will be the only playback device for spatial videos. I just don't think there's much value in that functionality and I doubt most people will pay $3000 for it. In due time, perhaps the price will change, and currency will inflate to make that price more palatable. But it's still a lot of money to spend on a product that simply provides virtually no more value than you can get out of a $500 TV and a $180 Apple TV or cheaper set-top box.
This whole charade just reminds me of 3D TV. Not too long ago, TV makers were trying for years to force 3D as "the next big thing," much like Oculus and Apple trying to do the same with headsets today. TV manufacturers tasted the massive windfall from the DTV conversions and hype for HDTV, and thought they could keep the gravy train going. For years, 3D was hoisted on consumers as the biggest thing to ever come to TV. "Throw out your brand-new $2000 65" 1080p television and get this new $2500 3D TV!" For a couple years, every movie came out on Blu-Ray with 3D as an option. Despite all that hype, virtually nobody bought it. And within a few years, every TV makers stopped manufacturing 3D TVs. You don't even hear anybody talk about 3D movies at home anymore.
I just wish Apple would take the massive R&D resources that went into this project, and like the 3D TV debacle of last decade, stop trying to "make fetch happen" and instead invest them in something more worthwhile.
I noticed it. I'm usually reluctant to acknowledge any kind of tonal change given how difficult it is to objectively track such things but this new firmware is clearly a different sound. And it does sound better.I have the AirPods Pro (2nd generation).
Anyone else notice an improvement in sound quality like I did? It can't be placebo as I noticed the improvement in sound quality before I realized it had updated the firmware.
Sound quality seems to be clearer and "fuller" with more midbass/bass punch.