sw1tcher said:MHz != performance
This is the MHz myth.
He wasn't comparing MHz performance, rather the relative improvement over time. In other words, the difference between G4 and P-M has been pretty much constant over time.
sw1tcher said:MHz != performance
This is the MHz myth.
.Andy said:The one thing that sucks which Apple could do is update them with a DVI port.
dotdotdot said:Same OS and Same Software - Unlike PC manufacturers, Apple gives every computer the same software. While people buying Dual 2.7 GHz powermacs may say its unfair, people buying the lowest mini will love Apple for it. And buying an Apple iBook? I love it. iLife 05, OS X 10.4.2, everything is the same.
dotdotdot said:Same size, just white - It is the same size as a powerbook, just white (and I believe its also lighter)
manu chao said:or summarized:
G4: +67% in 27 months
P-M: +41% in 28 months
Sure, the Pentium-M has a much faster bus and noticeably more L2 cache, but its progress is not better (in fact even worse) than that of the G4, but nobody is blaiming Intel or Dell for their lackluster updates.
(o.k. the P-M bus speed has increased by 33%, the G4 bus only by 26%, and doubling of the L2 cache, which both processors got, was discounted with the G4 by the removal of the L3 cache, but adding the 7448 to the game, the G4 would be ahead on these points as well)
dotdotdot said:Same size, just white - It is the same size as a powerbook, just white (and I believe its also lighter)
oskar said:But only that Apple doesn't make their own processors and are stuck with these kind of speedbumps and minor updates because of IBM. It's not completely Apple's fault. Apple knows that they can build an iBook with everything the PowerBook line has. But then there would be no room to keep selling PowerBooks until they can get a newer model out. Apple's apparently not willing to do this at the moment and hence, this kind of updates that many dislike.
If only people complaining were actually in the market for an iBook...
dotdotdot said:To everyone that said the new update is pretty weak:
I am about to save $500 on an Apple computer.
The only reason I wanted a powerbook was the built in Airport Extreme/Bluetooth, enough RAM (512 minimum), the new Sudden Motion Sensor (as I drop stuff a lot), the new scrolling trackpad, and the amazing OS X.
Now, the iBook has everything. Sure, its .17 less MHz than a PowerBook (like it will matter at ALL) and it doesnt have as good video, but the pros outweigh the cons:
Save $500 - only difference between the two now is the video.
Stay cool - the powerbook in the Apple store is BOILING! Its been on for, I don't know, three hours if I go in at 12 PM? The iBooks are cooler than the iMacs! And its a notebook!
Same OS and Same Software - Unlike PC manufacturers, Apple gives every computer the same software. While people buying Dual 2.7 GHz powermacs may say its unfair, people buying the lowest mini will love Apple for it. And buying an Apple iBook? I love it. iLife 05, OS X 10.4.2, everything is the same.
Same size, just white - It is the same size as a powerbook, just white (and I believe its also lighter)
$999 vs $1499
White vs Aluminum
Thats basically all it is now.
BGil said:Apple is still at fault because they could have put those dual core G4's in PB's a long time ago. At worst they could have started using the same quality screens that everyone else uses. They could have been using much better video cards and bigger/faster hard drives too.
Mike Teezie said:Bummer, I was hoping for widescreen.
Oh well. I guess a widescreen iBook wouldn't have left much incentive for one to buy a Powerbook.
Since this update is pretty minor, maybe there are some big updates coming soon for the whole laptop line.
web_god61 said:What a waste of time, just updated and the iBooks are already 6 months out of date. Sorry apple but this is the last stand I waited 18 months and your offering in the area of portables is full of ****. My 1500 is going to Dell or IBM.
- Another customer apple lost. (Only in laptops, I love the ipod.)
macrumors12345 said:I just find it funny how some people have so little grounding in reality. Yes, the processor is inferior to comparable PC laptops (which is why Apple is switching to Intel, duh). No, the resolution is not inferior to other standard 12" screens. No, the graphics are not subpar: Radeon 9550 will trash integrated graphics and is substantially better than low end GPUs found in many sub-$1000 laptops lucky enough to even have a dedicated graphics card (e.g. X300 SE). Yes, it's only 32 MB VRAM, but I'd readily take 9550/32 MB over X300 SE/64+ MB.
You're only batting 0.333. That's pretty good for baseball, but not too good for a forum in which you can easily look up the relevant facts in Google.
superdan311 said:Hello, Gentlemen and or ladies,
As I have waited for this update since the last revision to purchase an iBook to replace my lil' snow g3 500 iBook, I would like your opinions as to if I should go ahead and buy one or continue to hold out? As I mentioned I have a snow g3 500 ibook that is ok and gets the job done (256mb ram, recently had to change out the hard drive and replaced the cd drive with a cd-r/w) but the battery is toast.... as I have to use the adapter everywhere! And frankly i just want a faster book! But the question is should i continue to wait for the intelbooks since i have forced myself for to wait for this revision (which more or less blew) or go ahead and buy one of these? Plus I am a student, so i can do the whole promo rebate dealo which is cool, but i am also considering waiting anyway to see what the next apple show brings on 9/20 as the rebate goes through 9/24, meaning if they go ahead and bless the mini with a color display i get to get one of those! Man... I could go on with even more varibles... anyway i would appreciate any insight/suggestions you guys can offer!
Thanks!!!
bammac said:In terms of the heat, when I am just surfing etc it's just warm, not hot at all, so Im guessing the machine in the store may have be running something more intensive? Maybe Virtual PC with Win XP, any machine would run hot trying to figure out that mess!!!
superdan311 said:Hello, Gentlemen and or ladies,
As I have waited for this update since the last revision to purchase an iBook to replace my lil' snow g3 500 iBook, I would like your opinions as to if I should go ahead and buy one or continue to hold out? As I mentioned I have a snow g3 500 ibook that is ok and gets the job done (256mb ram, recently had to change out the hard drive and replaced the cd drive with a cd-r/w) but the battery is toast.... as I have to use the adapter everywhere! And frankly i just want a faster book! But the question is should i continue to wait for the intelbooks since i have forced myself for to wait for this revision (which more or less blew) or go ahead and buy one of these? Plus I am a student, so i can do the whole promo rebate dealo which is cool, but i am also considering waiting anyway to see what the next apple show brings on 9/20 as the rebate goes through 9/24, meaning if they go ahead and bless the mini with a color display i get to get one of those! Man... I could go on with even more varibles... anyway i would appreciate any insight/suggestions you guys can offer!
Thanks!!!
BGil said:Apple is still at fault because they could have put those dual core G4's in PB's a long time ago. At worst they could have started using the same quality screens that everyone else uses. They could have been using much better video cards and bigger/faster hard drives too.
RichardCarletta said:Apple said they plan to start shipping Mactel models with the lowend machines first. That means Mac Minis and eMacs first. Maybe iBooks would go Mactel by Fall 2006 at the earliest.
BGil said:Apple is still at fault because they could have put those dual core G4's in PB's a long time ago. At worst they could have started using the same quality screens that everyone else uses. They could have been using much better video cards and bigger/faster hard drives too.