Why are Apple making the MB so processor powerful while making so pathetic in terms of it's GPU?
Apple MacBook: Yesterdays technology at today's prices.
EVERYONE would've been happier had they stuck with 1.8 and 2.0 and gone with Santa Rosa. Now the graphics and chipset on the MB will be a generation behind every other laptop for the next 6 months.
Good work Apple. Idiots.
As someone waiting to buy their first Mac I am FURIOUS with Apple and their continued raping of MB buyers.
Apple MacBook: Yesterdays technology at today's prices.
EVERYONE would've been happier had they stuck with 1.8 and 2.0 and gone with Santa Rosa. Now the graphics and chipset on the MB will be a generation behind every other laptop for the next 6 months.
Good work Apple. Idiots.
As someone waiting to buy their first Mac I am FURIOUS with Apple and their continued raping of MB buyers.
As someone who has been waiting for about a year for a decent GPU in a MB to buy his first Mac I am severely pissed off.
Why are Apple making the MB so processor powerful while making so pathetic in terms of it's GPU?
For the next six months the MB will be poor compared to every other laptop, as every other one will have SR. Heck, the SR CPUs are cheaper than the old ones so they could've put in a 2.0 and 2.2.
Apple MacBook: Yesterdays technology at today's prices.
EVERYONE would've been happier had they stuck with 1.8 and 2.0 and gone with Santa Rosa. Now the graphics, CPU and chipset on the MB will be a generation behind every other laptop for the next 6 months.
Good work Apple. Idiots.
As someone waiting to buy their first Mac I am FURIOUS with Apple and their continued raping of MB buyers.
The MBs are the line of computers that will benefit most from SR and Apple do THIS? I actually cannot believe it. They are absolute bastards.
So, wonder how long it will take before we start getting "Why didn't they put Santa Rosa in the MB" threads, or "How long until Santa Rosa is in the MB" threads?