Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Am I the only person around here that loves the iPad mini and am sad to see it go away?
 
My sons high school is giving iPad Air's to all the freshmen (they give since years always the latest available model to the freshmen). Guess they know if they would give a model that is already several years old it might be problematic once they are seniors, since it is theirs to keep and has to last until the end of high school. Giving an old one might seem like saving money, but in the long run it is more expensive.

Good luck running an iPad Air originally released in October 2013 in May 2020 when he graduates. 1GB of RAM is barely enough for iOS 8. I can't even imagine iOS 13. Might work if they never ever update the devices and the apps still somehow maintain compatibility.

My thought is that with iOS 9 and OS X El Capitan, Apple is trying to make "Snow Leopard-like" releases for devices at the lower-end of their product ranges before they get dropped from iOS 10/OS X 10.12.

That might be true, but they did make kind of a big deal on stage about supporting older devices so if they cut out too many devices next year people will flip out. But then again Apple has never been scared to make people flip out.

Poppycock.

They should remove the iPad mini 3, as it is basically the same thing as the iPad mini 2, but costs £100 more. They should never have brought out the iPad mini 3; it embarrasses Apple.

I believe that Steve Jobs would not have released it.

Steve Jobs was the guy who released the original iPad with 256MB of RAM in 2010 and the iPhone 4 with 512MB of RAM a little bit later in 2010. He would have done whatever he wanted.
 
Anyone know what OS these refurb'd minis would be on? At $209, if it isn't on iOS 8, it wouldn't be a terrible deal, I don't think. Though I did buy my mini 2 used for about that 6 months ago.
 
Poppycock.

They should remove the iPad mini 3, as it is basically the same thing as the iPad mini 2, but costs £100 more. They should never have brought out the iPad mini 3; it embarrasses Apple.

I believe that Steve Jobs would not have released it.

I recently just bought an iPad mini 3 at Target since it was on sale ($50 off) and I get employee and red card discounts. After tax it ended up at $399 for the 64 gb model. I gave my mini 2 to my sister who desperately was in need of one.

I struggled over the idea of getting a 2 instead of the 3, but I love Touch ID. I like the new gold color. I hate the fact the mini 3 is the same as the 2 internally. Why couldn't they have put an A8 in it? Or I don't know. Something else to differentiate it from the 2. This was a d*** move by Apple. But I still went with the 3 because of the sale. It should have been priced no more than $50 higher than the 2 in the first place but that's just my opinion.

Sigh. I still haven't opened the 3 yet and am still contemplating whether I should just return it or not. Sometimes, as much as I love Apple, I just hate Apple.
 
It's funny though, because it doesn't seem like they think the same way about iPod touch users, as they'll probably continue selling this generation until next May and discontinue support for it right away, just like the previous generation.

Except legal, at least in Europe, they can not do that. They are obliged to provide support for a minimum period after a product is removed from sale.
 
Except legal, at least in Europe, they can not do that. They are obliged to provide support for a minimum period after a product is removed from sale.
Really? How did they handle the iPod touch 4th generation discontinuation in May 2013 in Europe?
 
Poppycock.

They should remove the iPad mini 3, as it is basically the same thing as the iPad mini 2, but costs £100 more. They should never have brought out the iPad mini 3; it embarrasses Apple.

I believe that Steve Jobs would not have released it.

If I'm not wrong, didn't the iPad mini 3 come out at the same price as the iPad mini 2 at launch? So you're getting an iPad mini with touch ID for the same price as the one without touch ID the week before. The only reason for the price difference is that the iPad mini 2 *dropped* in price, not that the mini 3 *increased* it. Hardly embarrassing.
 
I agree with others who have said that Apple needs to decrease the number of iterations of the products they sell. While it allows Apple to target different price ranges, it makes it tough for the customer to make a decision. More choices of different iterations of a product is bad. They need to simplify their products. Just include the current generation, and put the remaining inventory under the refurbished section. It's not like doing that is going to hurt sales. Also, they need to figure out the rMB and MBA thing soon. I think Apple can afford to sell a Retina Display laptop at a starting price of $899, or $999 even.

Apple made a mistake last year by not upgrading the CPU to the A8. They half-assed the iPad mini 3 by just adding a new color and TouchID. Maybe it doesn't matter but I think that's bad business. I was really looking forward to the iPad Mini 3 last year and then they did that. Huge turnoff for me. I could have gotten the iPad mini 2, but after using TouchID on my phone, that was something I wanted on an iPad.

On a related note, this is also a reason why I don't buy first generation products. The next generation is almost always significantly better. If rumors for the Apple Watch 2 are true, that's a huge improvement over the current Watch. Other examples are the iPod Touch 1st Generation to 2nd Generation, Macbook Air (may have been a couple generations later), 13" rMBP, iPad Air 1 to 2, Surface 1 to 2 (or 2 to 3), Moto X, etc. It can be a combination of design and/or additional features but I still try to stay away from First Gen products. Really new tech is not worth that money, unless you're ridiculously rich and want to deal with certain problems that could arise from that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
I find it deceptive for them to sell any device as "new" that has an A5 chip in it today, when the A5 chip launched over four years ago...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matheew944
Funny reading all of these posts with people proclaiming what Apple must or needs to do. As if they have more insight into Apple's markets, customer base, manufacturing, sales data, and software/hardware/product plans than is available to Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanDryden89
It is a right decision. Performances are quite good even with iOS 8 but it misses a retina display.
The first retina iPad was launched on 2012, after 3 years is ok to get rid of the last no-retina iPad.
 
After the IOS 8, first gen iPad Mini is crippled. We have two of them in our house and an iPad Air to go along. Simple web surfing with the Minis is an excruciating experience whereas the iPad Air is still acceptably fast. I can see why the original Mini is being pulled out. It simply cannot cope with the current software.

Which kind of annoys me as well. This is planned obsolescence and a devious way to push sales. Apple should at least allow us to downgrade to earlier versions of IOS and let us decide if we want to trade speed for features.
 
They should remove all iPads except for the latest Air and Mini.... Having 4 models on sale (5 yesterday) is not the Apple I love...
And that should go for all products I think. But I'm probably weird about this...

up voted your post. Now you are left wondering if its because I agree with the first part, or, I agree that you're weird :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Except legal, at least in Europe, they can not do that. They are obliged to provide support for a minimum period after a product is removed from sale.

I think you're thinking of a different kind of support, there's no obligation whatsoever for things like software updates or anything, just warranty and such.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.