Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Can somebody pelase show me the proof that those leaked pics (some from years ago, before iCloud existed) came from hacked iCloud accounts. This clickbait sensationlism is getting rediculous.

The leaked pics came from and underground celeb-sex pic ring, where at least 2 different people were offering pics and there were several "collections" that were exposed at different times.

The iCloud vulnerability itself is obviously bad, however it worked only accounts with bad/easy passwords (the github python script used a list of 500 common passwords to bruteforce). If its true they knew about it from this Balic guy around March, then that indeed is bad news. However, linking it to the celeb-nudes is just bad journalism and sensationlism.

If the press is to be belived then we need to ask why this "4chan" hacker guy has not been found yet, and does he perhaps work for Apple...

This. Exactly this. All of it.
 
They already addressed it with 2FA. All they need to do is to encourage its use

They are making a hash of that as well. When attempting to switch-on 2FA, Apple demanded I 'improve' my password before letting me into my account. Apparently it fails the 'commonality' test despite being made up of a long (>12) string of mixed characters.

So I'm still without 2FA - well done, Apple.
 
No. The people who used brute force attacks to steal people's private photos are at fault and should be prosecuted to the fullest possible extent if caught, along with anyone sharing them.

I'm pretty sure it was determined that the brute force attack wasn't used for this hacking. It was stupid people not keeping their stuff secure. Also pics didn't all come from iCloud. Same "hack" was used with Gmail and Android backups.
 
They are making a hash of that as well. When attempting to switch-on 2FA, Apple demanded I 'improve' my password before letting me into my account. Apparently it fails the 'commonality' test despite being made up of a long (>12) string of mixed characters.

So I'm still without 2FA - well done, Apple.

You decide what's important to you. Adhere to Apple's stronger password guideline or stay without 2FA.
 
I'm pretty sure it was determined that the brute force attack wasn't used for this hacking. It was stupid people not keeping their stuff secure. Also pics didn't all come from iCloud. Same "hack" was used with Gmail and Android backups.

So in your world, breaking into someone's account is okay, as long as they used "weak security" (whatever you judge that to be)? And stealing and sharing private nude photos from those accounts is also okay?
 
You decide what's important to you. Adhere to Apple's stronger password guideline or stay without 2FA.

It's already an extremely strong password; why should I have to change it just because Apple has gone into panic mode and are now crackings nuts with sledgehammers.

You really think that's good customer service?
 
At this moment nobody knows who did the hack issue and nobody knows exactly what is the security bug.

Some people say that there is a security bug in the backup icloud, others say that it was a brute force hack. I am sure that Apple has not fixed this issue because there were some new photos of kardashian less than a week ago.

I don't think the bug is related to the security questions because you can't find the correct answers for 30 or more people. Hackers like to do things easily and fast.
 
If your password is Password123, any loss of data is really self inflicted and you have nobody to blame.

Awful victim blaming. "If she didn't want to get raped why did she dress like that?"

If you get hacked it's the hackers or people who gained entry into a private account who are to blame.
 
Awful victim blaming. "If she didn't want to get raped why did she dress like that?"

If you get hacked it's the hackers or people who gained entry into a private account who are to blame.

To be fair, it's more akin to leaving your downstairs windows open. We all know that burglary in that instance is a disgrace but we are realistic enough to know how the world is and so we close our windows and invest in locks.
 
So in your world, breaking into someone's account is okay, as long as they used "weak security" (whatever you judge that to be)? And stealing and sharing private nude photos from those accounts is also okay?

No I didn't say that. It is wrong, but it is also wrong for Apple to get the blame for that situation. This wasn't Apple's fault. Apple use the same security that dozens of other websites have used. And for the most part security questions are OK, not great, but OK. There obvious flaws in that system now with social media. But there have been plenty of warnings out of the years to use strong answers that aren't easily obtainable on social media.
This is the same as suggesting people don't use their birthday as their actual password.

The fact is, yes Apple can make stronger security,but even the strongest security can't protect stupid users.
 
To me at least, there is a huge difference between creating products that missed the market and releasing updates/products that just don't work correctly. The first is general business risk and the second is just sloppy performance.

I have 20+ serious bug reports against current Xcode tools, some of them have prevented me from doing my job. I don't ever remember having that number of serious show stopper bugs in the OS 7/8/9 days. iCloud with Core Data has been a disaster since it was introduced, what 3 years ago.

New technology will always have some bumps, but I have really come to the opinion that Apple is happy if something is shinny and new, but does not really care if it works correctly because next year they will be replacing it with something else shinny and new. I believe they have the attitude "Why take the time to get it right we just going to replace it."

I am not saying Apple is any worse than its competitors in this regard, but I do think this applies even to the Jobs era after Apple was successful with the iPhone.

I remember showstopper bugs that killed access to Zip drives so no access to archived work and shared files (ended up being an update that killed the SCSI connection) as well as a modem upgrade that didnt allow me to use the internal fax mechanism that meant I had to go out and buy a stand alone Fax that stopped me from getting my work done. When OS updates would corrupt fonts. All from OS updates. Cost my business at the time heavily.

Of course the web as we know it hadn't proliferated by then, so I had no mega phone to shout with.

To say that things are going downhill is a misnomer, as with software and hardware you're always going to get issues. That's its very nature - thankfully most upgrades go smoothly, but I'm yet to come across quality software (i.e from Apple, Adobe, MS, Coda etc etc) that hasn't needed an upgrade for one reason or another. Unfortunaly, with that, we occasionally suffer issues where something goes awry.
 
I don't think the bug is related to the security questions because you can't find the correct answers for 30 or more people. Hackers like to do things easily and fast.

Just remember, this isn't a new thing. People have been asking celebrity accounts for years. I remember a r few years back a Disney star got stuff stolen, then Scarlet Johanson a couple yes ago, and a different girl from glee, etc. This isn't new, just some decided to post all the pictures at once.

That's why is more then likely a security question issue. These are famous people with data everywhere using easy to figure out questions.

Also this wasn't just from iCloud.
 
Basic password security concepts have been around for decades and work well. The two most common are:

1. Delays between failed password attempts after a fixed number of tries.
2. Max failed attempts before either a phone call is needed or a very long delay.

Apple appears to have used neither and that makes brute force approaches viable. The inclusion of either will mostly eliminate brute force attacks.

Many people tend to pick poor passwords, even when they meet the length/case/numeric restrictions. This wont change, so other means are needed to protect things.

The two step process is a good start towards better cloud security. More is needed like the two above and other similar ideas. Its not rocket science.
 
It's already an extremely strong password; why should I have to change it just because Apple has gone into panic mode and are now crackings nuts with sledgehammers.

You really think that's good customer service?

Why don't you spell out your password here and let us decide ? :p

It's your own account. You decide for yourself. I got 2FA set up without any issue.

The biggest hurdle for me was actually the security questions. I had forgotten the answers. :)
 
Apple need to publicly address this they look BAD and very irresponsible. It is standard practice for white-hat hacker to inform companies of security flaws like this. It is also standard practice for white-hat hackers to give the company reasonable amount of time to fix it then go public with the flaw.
While I am not a expert, I would think that Apple should be able to fix this is far less than 6 months. If Apple had know able the flaw for 6 months and only fixed when it when public and the bad PR hit, that is disgraceful and Apple shouldn't be trusted for with any security critical product such as .... ApplePay.

All software has bugs, but then a companies becomes aware of a security flaws like this they need to take it seriously, lit seems Apple may not have. If this flaw had become public a week or two after Apple was made aware of it while they were working on a fix, that would have been bad luck. Six months is too long. When Windows users get a security update that is not on the second Tuesday of the month, it is usually some serious security flaw that Microsoft didn't want to want less than one month to patch.

Yoi have no clue how long they worked on this or how seriously they took it. You are making your uneducated opinion sound like fact. Please stop.
 
If the press is to be belived then we need to ask why this "4chan" hacker guy has not been found yet, and does he perhaps work for Apple...[/QUOTE]

4chan is a Public forum/hacker/geek community. It's not Just one person. 4chan is where the pics were leaked originally.
 
Kardashian's got a real cheek complaining about these latest leaked photos, considering half the worlds population has seen her chuff thanks to her home made sex video (albeit for the purposes of 'research'. Ahem).
 
Just remember, this isn't a new thing. People have been asking celebrity accounts for years. I remember a r few years back a Disney star got stuff stolen, then Scarlet Johanson a couple yes ago, and a different girl from glee, etc. This isn't new, just some decided to post all the pictures at once.

That's why is more then likely a security question issue. These are famous people with data everywhere using easy to figure out questions.

Also this wasn't just from iCloud.

Finally a common sense post!
 
We like to blame simple auth questions or people or whatever but passwords are a fundamentally difficult thing for people in general. Handling tech support and training, I quickly had to accept the reality that people have a much more difficult time with passwords than I would have ever guessed. It makes sense when you think about it. "Remember an arbitrary string of characters meant to be difficult to figure out (and remember) for n number of services where n is greater than or equal to 2 (computer and email) and change a few of them when forced to.
 
Can you guys answer something for me? Do you honestly think ANY company can get 2FA or any enhanced security feature developed, tested, and implemented in a few days (let alone weeks)? NO.

This isn't you bank we are talking about here.

Last time I remember, Gmail allowed me to try 12 logins before I finally remembered what my password was for a VERY old email account. Granted after a few tries it wanted me to enter a recaptcha, but still.

If you have something so sensitive stored online, ENCRYPT IT. I don't care if it is nude selfies, tax reports, insurance information, or whatever (store what you want). But do yourself a favor and encrypt the file before.

I said it before and I will say it again. Passwords are the second most horrible security measure ever used (security questions are the first). Why do we still need passwords? They are so ridiculous that people either use the same one, or save them somewhere (text file on your desktop anyone?). 2FA needs to be a requirement EVERYWHERE. As long as we have passwords as the only main entry point to our accounts, people will use simple passwords, or re-use the same password.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.