It's the same as the current mini displayport.Will they not have to design a more compact version of the Thunderbolt port? It looks far too big to fit in the side of an Air.
It's the same as the current mini displayport.Will they not have to design a more compact version of the Thunderbolt port? It looks far too big to fit in the side of an Air.
There are just some ridiculous posts here...
4MB ram? You mean 4GB ram. Also, 2GB should be than enough to run Lion for next years to come. Apple will not give up their 100 dollars. Their competitions are much more expensive than they are. These are premium thin laptop. They are not made for average joe...
Intel Graphic card is better than Nvidia? Okay...
7 inch laptop? I am glad you don't work for apple. I would sell my shares and move my money elsewhere.
There are some posts here that are either serious trolls or some people just don't have any idea what is going on here and are just making ridiculous demands.
It sounds like it's just one of the many different iPad bluetooth keyboard/case combo's. Zagg and a few others make cases that fit that description and the keyboards have a lip around to snap the iPad into, making it a case.
This one by Logitech has a brushed aluminum body:
http://www.zagg.com/accessories/logitech-ipad-2-keyboard-case
Thunderbolt??
Sorry for your friends personal problems but that has no relevance to this thread. You should not need a light on the keyboard to type as most can type without looking at the keyboard. Please take the attitude elsewhere.
Sent from my AT&T iPhone 4 using Tapatalk
I
Full disclosure, I own one, but I don't care if its obsolete. I just don't see the point in a SB Macbook Air.
It does seem like the price isn't coming down as fast as it does for other technology. I also wonder why.
Confined to your own equipment is great right up to the point a fire, flood or other disaster destroys everything... Then what?
Business is moving to online tools, software and storage. Why waste money on servers and PCs that cost thousands of dollars and basically stuck in a cycle of maintenance, upgrades and keeping a full time IT staff when companies like Google has a staff of 100+ PHD's that do nothing but ensure that data is safe and secure. Not to mention having physical hardware still requires paying for off site back ups. Going online is/will be the cheaper, smarter and safer move as bandwidth to homes increases.
I have all my pictures back up online, I have no need to deal with failed HDD's and wasting money on redundant hardware when it it more secure, disaster proof and always available online. Physical media is needed to run some things but backup solutions that only rely on in house media IMO is only half the solution or it's a crap shoot as to when that hardware fails.
Then again, I'm sure some people enjoy attracting the ladies bragging they have 8,10,20 etc... TB of storage.![]()
Thunderbolt is a farce.
It's nothing more than an old school copper wire. NOT The Fiber Optic system that is patented as Light Peak, which is the real nomenclature for the technology.
At the last moment they got cheap, removed the fiber, and strung a silly little piece of copper wire in it. This reduced the data transfer rate dramatically.
Sure it's a bit faster than USB, but not even close to what it was when invented. Not only that, once you turn Apple loose, they always come up with some "Magical and Revolutionary" name and claim for what's it's capable of.
What a sham.
Honestly, what is wrong with people here?
SB blows away C2D. That's the point. And another year from now when Ivy Bridge is ready Apple will ship that.
Yes we all know how much we all need 100gbit bandwidth between our external HD and our laptop. Get real. 10Gbit is more than enough for any type of connection at the moment. If they released the Fiber version it'd be overkill for todays needs. .
Dude, so what? If they just thought that it is overkill, they would release it anyway because they wouldn't need invent anything new like that for quite some time and they could focus on something else... They didn't release it because they will get more money if they release first TB and then the real deal...
What is wrong with some of you? You settle with worse technology just because it is ok? If everybodey released the best right away, we'd be few years ahead our time... Don't you all want that?
It doesn't make sense from a business prospective. People looking for power aren't looking for a Macbook Air right now. Its never been that kind of machine. To design an SB Macbook Air would cost a lot of money I'm sure. Seems better spent on an early Ivy Bridge. Again, Apple has little competition beyond ASUS here, so they have time to wait and release something very big.
Apple needs to re-instate the backlit-keyboard.
Then, only then, would I even consider upgrading.
The prices for SSD's are actually coming down but every time that does happen, they release an even faster SSD with higher price point. But if you check the ones released 3 years ago, they are very cheap at the moment. Even the 1.5 year old ones have acceptable prices. But since one always wants to buy the newest and fastest, their prices stay basically the same which is normal.
kill the plastic macbooks
call the new airs the macbooks
would make sense since jobs said the airs are the future
I giess when I go to price them they are only showing the latest speed versions. But part of the problem is that the largest capacity are now just getting to the size I would consider using. I have no need of a 160GB drive of any type. At this point 500GB is a minimum for a laptop for me. The largest sized drives are up over $1000. I'm looking at it from the perspective of the price of the largest drive not going down as that largest size slowly gets big enough for me to consider it.
Dude, so what? If they just thought that it is overkill, they would release it anyway because they wouldn't need invest into anything similar for quite some time and they could focus on something else... They didn't release it because they will get more money if they release first TB and then the real deal...
What is wrong with some of you? You settle with worse technology just because it is ok? If everybodey released the best right away, we'd be few years ahead our time... Don't you all want that?
Several competitors, including Lenovo and Samsung, are already using Westmere and/or Sandy Bridge processors in similar models, so Apple is likely to do so now in order to keep pace. The Core 2 Duo is an old design so even though Ivy Bridge is a few months away, I don't think it is wise for Apple to wait much longer. They can release a new version next year if they want to. Just because they do doesn't mean you need to update to it, so why should potential MacBook Air buyers in July or September be denied a Sandy Bridge version if one is ready?
Hoping for major changes here not just a minor improvement... Please, Apple...
Hoping for major changes here not just a minor improvement... Please, Apple...