And their data to train.
Of course they do. This ChatGPT integration is just a fancy API call. Or why do you think the user has to confirm the requests for using ChatGPT every single time?
In your dreams. Of course they are getting data, why do you think you have to consent for the query to be addressed by ChatGPT? Clearly whichever privacy arrangement is in place for ‘Apple intelligence’ does not apply when you choose to use ChatGPT.
I agree with your leverage part, but:
1) Apple just introduced Apple Intelligence?! Clearly they want their own AI infrastructure, but they are late to the party so they have to partner with OpenAI until their own foundation is "good enough" to replace that. You can find more info about, what and how they are training their own models (spoiler: "licensed data, including data selected to enhance specific features, as well as publicly available data collected by our web-crawler, AppleBot") on the dev site.
Edit: And of course Apple could monetize it in the future. Once Apple Intelligence is out of beta it could get its own subscription, be part of a paid iCloud membership or Apple One. They even could offer a "business tier" with specialized features for developers,...
2) They said during the Keynote they want to include more models and plattforms in the future. So Gemini is just one of them. I would argue the integration is not at a system level as you said. They showcased how it works, basically local on device first, then Apples Cloud and if that is not enough the user gets asked if they want to use third-party services. Even in the video it just looks like a regular ChatGPT API call (which they easily can replace with any other plattform if they want or maybe the user sets in the settings).
3) If you consent to the request for using ChatGPT of course they'll get your user data. Because why consent in the first place? I agree with the subscription part, but I don't think Apple gets a cut.
Do you have a source for that? I am not trying to argue, just curious where they say this.
Edit: Found this:
That's a little bit cryptic. They won't store the data, but they still could use it? And if I login with my OpenAI account all the rules won't apply?
OpenAI CTO Mira Murat has said “Apple has said that it won’t share use data with OpenAI, and that OpenAI will not train its models with Apple user data”.
http://9to5mac.com/2024/06/12/chatgpt-isnt-safe-says-musk/
If Apple, and by extension you, aren't paying for it, then the price is probably your data. But 'assurances' gonna assure.
You can have an account with OpenAI and use that instead of Apple's free OpenAI access. In that case OpenAI terms of service apply, not Apple's. There is usually an API key involved that you have to get from OpenAI. But I suppose Apple will make it more seamless to connect iOS with the OpenAI API.That's a little bit cryptic. They won't store the data, but they still could use it? And if I login with my OpenAI account all the rules won't apply?
I just can't believe that is all they get. Exposure and "maybes" don't pay the bills.No, what OpenAI gets its access to hundreds of million of users with money which might become customers. Also they get even more name recognition.
Do you have a source for that? I am not trying to argue, just curious where they say this.
Edit: Found this:
That's a little bit cryptic. They won't store the data, but they still could use it? And if I login with my OpenAI account all the rules won't apply?
Wow,..I'm amazed that Apple has hoodwinked OpenAI into providing their service for free! Is there anything that this trillion dollar company can't scrooge?
"Privacy protections are built in when accessing ChatGPT within Siri and Writing Tools—requests are not stored by OpenAI, and users’ IP addresses are obscured."
If they can't store the request, they can't really use them to train models.
I work all day. I work all night.Money, money, money...
Must be funny...
In the rich mans world!
And we all know that when you don't pay, you are the product… so… yeah.
OpenAI are definitely getting something in return. Just, perhaps not in cash.
Forget Google, where does that leave the web? Who's going to create the content when nobody's going to it directly but only reading an AI's interpretation of it?AI is going to be the new search engine monopoly. When AIs become good search engines themselves where does that leave Google Search...
I agree with this, not least because I think OpenAI's business model will change over time when they decide it's time to make money. They're in the grow-your-user-base period at the moment, giving their product away for free, but eventually they'll expect users to pay for it either directly or through adverts. Now Apple aren't going to want OpenAI's adverts appearing in Siri, so at that point what happens?You are comparing Apples to Oranges. MS reasons for working with Openai are long term. Apple's reasons are short-term:
From what I understand, ChatGPT requests within Siri and writing tools are not going to be stored. What about request outside Siri and writing tools? Will they be stored?"Privacy protections are built in when accessing ChatGPT within Siri and Writing Tools—requests are not stored by OpenAI, and users’ IP addresses are obscured."
If they can't store the request, they can't really use them to train models.
I prefer to look at it as Google is sharing ad revenue with Apple.Is the other way around...like Google is paying Apple to be the default search engine
Help me understand this?
So What exactly is the point of owning a Pro iPhone now in terms of ChatGPT , if you still have to pay to use the advanced features ?