Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not me. I prefer the full size iPad and if Apple can make it thinner and lighter all the better.

I would be torn. I had a mini for a few weeks before returning it for a 4. The mini has awesome portability, but the 4 has an incredible screen. Decisions decisions :)
 
I really hope we either 1.) see the starting price of the 9.7" iPad with Retina Display fall to $399 or 2.) see the minimum storage increased to 32GB. Retina displays have surely reduced in price considerably, and I have to assume the new display tech that allows for the iPad to be thinner is even cheaper to produce. I just don't think Apple can justify asking $499 for a 16GB 9.7" iPad in late 2013.
 
after trying out the HTC One, I keep wondering why Apple never incorporated a front facing speaker? makes video watching that much more fun as you don't have to turn up the volume so high, and no need to cup your hand over the edge of the device. wonder when this will come to the iDevice?

Yep.. Sometimes I switch from my ipad to the HTC One to watch videos. The current speaker is really bad, Apple should adopt the front speaker design of the HTC One.
 
It's all personal preference, but yes, for me anyway, the Mini size is much better. It's far more convenient for reading, for carrying, for, well, lots of things. I can stick my mini in my back pocket of my jeans. Heck, I can fit my Mini (amazingly) in the FRONT pocket of my jeans, as long as I don't sit down with it in there. I just much prefer the size.

I'm the opposite. To each his own, I guess.

I much prefer the full size iPad over the iPad Mini, as I can't really read what I want to on the Mini - it's too small. I guess some people prefer to read paperback books (like reading on a Mini) or reading a hard-cover book (like reading on the full-size iPad).

Whenever I see someone's iPad Mini, and use it, I start to beg for my full size computer. When I'm using my full-size iPad, I never have that feeling... and I carry it around me like a textbook everywhere I go.
 
What about the iPhone? Oct?

I'm no expert, but from all the rumours and expected release dates I presume there will be a September event where we'll see iPhone 5S, iPad 5 and updated MacBook Pros released - alongside iOS 7, Mavericks and maybe one or two iPods. Then there will be a later event probably for the release of the iPad mini 2 and the Mac Pro probably including Haswell iMacs and Mac mini. That'll see all of Apple's products updated for the year. I guess the latter event could see an update to Apple TV too and possibly some hint towards the "iWatch."
 
128GB for a decent price, would be nice!

I think 128GB will be the new 64GB version in the new model, and they'll drop the 16GB version in the full sized retina iPad (perhaps still offer it in an iPad 2 if they still offer the non-retina option). This will in the minds of consumers create additional value in the flagship iPad, which is more expensive, in that it'll have the larger size with more screen real estate (a thin beautiful mini-type chassis), plus it'll come standard with 32GB and offer 64GB and 128GB options, where the mini will continue to offer storage in 16/32/64GB sizes.
 
To be honest, I'm glad that we won't see a new iPad mini until very late. I got the first gen for Christmas and although it REALLY needs a Retina display, I was hoping to get quite close to a year out of it before I found myself buying a new one. It's a good product, but Retina would make it a great product.
 
KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has also indicated that issues related to a Retina display were likely to result in a later-than-expected launch for the next iPad mini.

Why is a less than 1 year update later than expected?

Do we really need less than 1 year updates to an iPad? I have both an iPad 3 and a Mini. So far I have not experienced any issues that urgently require a premature update earlier than the usual 1-year appeasement cycle of the 'I-must-have-a-new-toy' brigade and Shareholders.
 
I'm buying a retina mini when it comes out. I'd love it to be a touch less wide so that it fits into interior suit coat pockets. Right now I'm running around with a Nexus 7 but I just can't buy into that app eco system. Also I don't trust the security so I won't put anything but my junk email on it. Certainly no work email goes on it. But the form factor is convenient for travel around town.
 
I'm the opposite. To each his own, I guess.

I much prefer the full size iPad over the iPad Mini, as I can't really read what I want to on the Mini - it's too small. I guess some people prefer to read paperback books (like reading on a Mini) or reading a hard-cover book (like reading on the full-size iPad).

Whenever I see someone's iPad Mini, and use it, I start to beg for my full size computer. When I'm using my full-size iPad, I never have that feeling... and I carry it around me like a textbook everywhere I go.

I think it's great we have these options now, they're both such wonderful devices, neither is bad or worse. I've had a full sized iPad in the past, now I've got the mini and I love my mini, it's for me the perfect size, but for me I'm all about portability in devices (and will suffer the tradeoff of power, resolution, etc to get it in every device) - my laptop is an 11" MBA, a great complement to the mini. That said, the full sized iPad is gorgeous, the screen is wonderful and if it gets the mini treatment next rev and goes thinner and more lightweight it'll be even better than it is today!

As for reading, though I use my mini to read lots of PDFs and scans of books and journal articles for my course studies, for my leisure reading it's the Kindle all the way, I can't imagine any iPad replacing my Kindle - reading on it just doesn't compare, it's so much more enjoyable for me.
 
I would be torn. I had a mini for a few weeks before returning it for a 4. The mini has awesome portability, but the 4 has an incredible screen. Decisions decisions :)

Yeah I'd love a retina mini for reading but everything else I'd probably use the full size iPad. But I can see where people would be torn.
 
A thinner bezel for the iPad Mini would be nice to make the one-hand around the back portrait hold less ackward. At the same time, the bezel getting any smaller will mean the thumb is intruding more into the display area when doing a one-hand portrait side grip.

Yes, it would make one-hand around the back much easier for me since I don't have large hands. 7" android devices are narrower so it's easier to hold it that way.

I wouldn't worry about thumb intrusion since iPad Mini already has the software to reject unintended touches.
 
I wish they would add 128GB model to the mini as well. Oh I also need more ram in it. With 512MB my safari seems to reload most of the time I reopen it.
 
Hard to believe Apple would change the iPad Mini case so soon. I figured they'd take advantage of not changing major parts and thus reaping more profits. Not that they care that much about Wall Street.

If the Mini is not retina I guess I'll just have to wait another year before buying one.
 
For a "big" and "heavy" device like the iPad, the narrow edge may not work.

I think the idea is to make is thinner, narrower and lighter to make using a full sized iPad generally more practical. I'd still go for an iPad mini though, something about the size fits me just right. I thought the iPad was great until the mini came out and now it just looks too big. Bring on Retina iPad mini!

----------

Yes, it would make one-hand around the back much easier for me since I don't have large hands. 7" android devices are narrower so it's easier to hold it that way.

I wouldn't worry about thumb intrusion since iPad Mini already has the software to reject unintended touches.

Yeah, the software behind the iPad mini is really impressive. You can physically see it working. Drag your finger from the edge onto the screen or just hold it with your fingers blatantly on the screen at the edge and it won't register a touch. Very well thought through.
 
I really hope we either 1.) see the starting price of the 9.7" iPad with Retina Display fall to $399 or 2.) see the minimum storage increased to 32GB. Retina displays have surely reduced in price considerably, and I have to assume the new display tech that allows for the iPad to be thinner is even cheaper to produce. I just don't think Apple can justify asking $499 for a 16GB 9.7" iPad in late 2013.

New thinner tech is almost always more expensive.
 
Yeah, the retina mini has to come well after the ipad 5 to avoid cannibalization. I'd say 90 days at a minimum. Otherwise the ipad 5 early adopters will just return them for a mini.

That's assuming that iPad 5 early adopters are willing to sacrifice screen real estate for the portability of the iPad mini. The iPad 5 with a smaller bezel will be a day 1 purchase for me. :cool:
 
Retina mini would be awesome, but want more memory and processor first.

While there are times the non-retina screen bothers me, I would much rather have more RAM and a faster processor. I find myself doing a lot more app switching on my iPad, and the lack of RAM is really noticeable on Safari tabs or if you have more than 3 or so apps open.

Renee Ritchie of iMore says that apple does 3 things, but you can only have two in any given product. They are: thinness, retina, battery life.

Full sized iPad= retina and battery life (not thin)
Mini= thin and battery life (not retina)

Since they will not make the mini any thicker, they are struggling getting the required battery life with a retina screen, and they won't release until it is at least as good as the current model.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.