Apple Reportedly Shelves 'Walkie-Talkie' Feature Allowing iPhone-to-iPhone Messaging Without Wi-Fi or Cellular

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
46,727
8,945



Apple has shelved a "walkie-talkie" feature that would have allowed iPhone users to communicate with each other in areas without cellular coverage, such as while skiing or hiking, according to The Information.


The report claims Apple was working with Intel on the project, which supposedly would have enabled iPhone users to send messages directly to other iPhone users over long-distance radio waves that bypass cellular networks, adding that the technology was designed to run over the 900 MHz radio spectrum.

This feature is not to be confused with the Apple Watch's Walkie-Talkie feature, which relies on Wi-Fi or a cellular connection.

The project is said to have been suspended in part because the Apple executive heading it, Rubén Caballero, left the company earlier this year. The technology also relied on Intel modems, according to the report, and Apple is expected to start using Qualcomm modems in iPhones again starting in 2020.

The technology could still show up in future iPhones, but development of the feature appears to be on hold for now.

Article Link: Apple Reportedly Shelves 'Walkie-Talkie' Feature Allowing iPhone-to-iPhone Messaging Without Wi-Fi or Cellular
 

rs0212

macrumors newbie
Oct 28, 2014
13
24
This would've been great. I remember on our old Nextel phones we used to be able to Direct Connect even when we had no service, up to two or three miles if I recall. Only some phones supported it, so we always bought those ones. Forget what they branded that feature as.

Anyway, especially in America where cell coverage isn't available everywhere, I think this would be a great feature.
 

digitalexplr

macrumors 65816
Dec 13, 2016
1,174
736
Central Missouri
Totally would have used this on vacation. Some of the areas my family was in lacked cell service but communication at a short distance would have been super helpful (car pickup, delay in movement, moving of supplies, etc).
You need to look into GMRS radios. Your situation is exactly what they are designed for.
 

Brainjax44

macrumors newbie
Apr 17, 2012
13
27
I mean.. the Apple Watch version alone is weird AF. Why would anyone want this.
The watch version was just a dedicated “record my message and text it to someone” function. The same exact functionality with the same number of steps could be done within the messaging app itself. Click and hold the microphone button, release, audio sent. Plus it was utterly pointless since the there was a noticeable lag time between being able to connect and allowing you to actually record a message to send. I used it once and never again.

This, however, would function as an actual walkie talkie as I understand it. The benefits in emergency response are pretty great. I read once that there was an app that would let its users communicate over bluetooth and if there were enough users in-between two locations, you could technically relay a message to far off locations without the use of internet or cellular. The app didn’t do so great because it relied on a lot of people downloading the app but a similar tech can be implemented here. Apple seems to already be doing something along those lines with their upcoming (rumored?) trackable tags, using crowdsourced location data to find things. Think of large concert or festival venues where cellular service is impacted, or being on a cruse ship and wanting to communicate with your kids on the other side of the ship. Imagine touring in a foreign country and not having to deal with paying for cellular service just to stay in touch with your travel companion when you lose sight of each other. The possibilities are pretty great.

Just as airdrop gives you an alternative to file sharing without connectivity, this feature give you an alternative to communicating without connectivity.
 

kevinpdoyle

macrumors member
May 2, 2012
41
72
You need to look into GMRS radios. Your situation is exactly what they are designed for.
Yeah those would have been handy and I have used them in the past (then jungle driving vs recent beach vacation); this was more that we realized there was no cell service when we go there. Not worth a GMRS as it was all small things but if my phone came with the capability I would have used it.
 

Hieveryone

macrumors 601
Apr 11, 2014
4,533
1,568
USA
It should be available only if the phone is unable to connect to WiFi or cellular.

That way people won’t use it unnecessarily. I’m no expert, but I assume if everyone started using it there may be problems. Which is why it should only be used if needed.

Great feature. I hope they release it.
 

as.fonseca

macrumors newbie
Jul 22, 2019
7
7
It’s also reasonable to expect that the feature would be illegal in some (perhaps all) parts of the world (like Europe) where the use of such bands are heavily regulated and not for general use.
You are probably wrong. Apple was certainly using an ISM band, as happens with technologies like Wi-Fi and cordless phones. This is a very interesting project, a shame that is stopped according to reports.
 

as.fonseca

macrumors newbie
Jul 22, 2019
7
7
That's annoying. Lately it seems the innovation news coming out of Apple is the death of innovative projects. :/
Tim Apple.
[doublepost=1566843037][/doublepost]
I mean.. the Apple Watch version alone is weird AF. Why would anyone want this.
Whether you use cordless phones at home or at work you may already have a clue as to the usefulness of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: izyreal