Cameras going to stick out moreI can't imagine that any cost savings would be passed onto consumers. Apple is already anticipating supply constraints.
Cameras going to stick out moreI can't imagine that any cost savings would be passed onto consumers. Apple is already anticipating supply constraints.
For people who just want to bump their post counter up, click on their username and select 'ignore'. It works wonderfully - I did last year, and now miss all that inane blabbering...Is there a mute button for your constant inane replies?
Just raise the prices of the iPhone, Apple. I’m willing to pay whatever price you decide to put out there.
The periscope camera in 2022 is not going to be cheap. It looks like a very complicated design as is.
Just take my American Dollars already! My purse is ready to hand over the $
well, if you miss it — you should unignore herFor people who just want to bump their post counter up, click on their username and select 'ignore'. It works wonderfully - I did last year, and now miss all that inane blabbering...![]()
Just raise the prices of the iPhone, Apple. I’m willing to pay whatever price you decide to put out there.
The target of apple is that you lease the iPhone, there have been talks with some financial operators since a couple of years but still nothing has come out… yet. But that is not such a bad idea. The benefit?, you bring the iPhone to much more people who cant buy it in “normal” installments.You'll get your wish. In the not too distant future the iPhone Pro will be so expensive that they will be sold via payment plans for the vast majority who don't want to pay the $2000/$2500 baseline price.
Sure, it's clear Apple's goal is to make financing the iPhone the "go to" method of purchase, but this will allow them to go to town with the actual unit price as all everyone will care about is the price of their chosen monthly payment plan, rather than the actual one-off cost.The target of apple is that you lease the iPhone, there have been talks with some financial operators since a couple of years but still nothing has come out… yet. But that is not such a bad idea. The benefit?, you bring the iPhone to much more people who cant buy it in “normal” installments.
We already got those savings last year when Apple deleted the power adapter and EarPods.
iPhone 12 is $829, up from the $699 iPhone 11.
Oh wait.
“it remains unclear if those savings would be presented to customers” lol
😂 He is brimming with them!!! Quite a few years since Pro Max is $1099. Might be hiked sometime soonStop giving Timmy boy ideas 😬😂
So does this mean that Apple will pass the savings on o customers who wet can buy top-of-the-line, maxed-out ip
Apple is reportedly changing up the way it produces camera modules for its iPhone, now opting to individually produce each of the camera lenses separately, rather than procure them together and have them pre-assembled, according to a report from The Elec.
![]()
The report notes that up to last year, Apple's iPhone camera lenses were produced by its suppliers LG InnoTek, Sharp, and O'Film. The lenses were "pre-assembled." Now, Apple is consolidating the production of its camera modules to its largest supplier, Foxconn, to save costs.
Foxconn, in preparation for its new camera assembly responsibility, has received new inspection equipment from the South Korean firm Hyvision System. The new system will check whether the wide, Ultra Wide, and Telephoto cameras' lenses, including their optical axis and image sensors, are correctly aligned on higher-end iPhone models. An incorrect alignment could result in drastically reduced image quality.
The new changes are being done to "save costs," but it remains unclear if those savings would be presented to customers. It's also unclear whether the new production methodology and Foxconn's role in camera assembly will be in practice for the upcoming iPhone 13. Given that the new iPhones are already in production, that's unlikely to be the case.
Article Link: Apple Reportedly Using New Method to Assemble iPhone Cameras in Effort to Save Costs
So does this mean that since Apple will be saving money, they will pass the savings onto we customers, and we will be able to buy top-of-the-line, maxed-out iPhones for less than $1,000???
Apple is reportedly changing up the way it produces camera modules for its iPhone, now opting to individually produce each of the camera lenses separately, rather than procure them together and have them pre-assembled, according to a report from The Elec.
![]()
The report notes that up to last year, Apple's iPhone camera lenses were produced by its suppliers LG InnoTek, Sharp, and O'Film. The lenses were "pre-assembled." Now, Apple is consolidating the production of its camera modules to its largest supplier, Foxconn, to save costs.
Foxconn, in preparation for its new camera assembly responsibility, has received new inspection equipment from the South Korean firm Hyvision System. The new system will check whether the wide, Ultra Wide, and Telephoto cameras' lenses, including their optical axis and image sensors, are correctly aligned on higher-end iPhone models. An incorrect alignment could result in drastically reduced image quality.
The new changes are being done to "save costs," but it remains unclear if those savings would be presented to customers. It's also unclear whether the new production methodology and Foxconn's role in camera assembly will be in practice for the upcoming iPhone 13. Given that the new iPhones are already in production, that's unlikely to be the case.
Article Link: Apple Reportedly Using New Method to Assemble iPhone Cameras in Effort to Save Costs
True, I think playing with perceived scarcity has been a big part of Apple’s marketing strategy for a long while. Just builds up a hype in sensitive population to drive up sales. Like “If I don’t get it on day 1 life is ruined and I might have to wait a few weeks longer, horror!” 😋 I enjoy my Apple devices, but my new entertainment is just watching people on public transport around me glued to their phones. It’s like “Too Many Friends” by Placebo.
Of course it’s not. This is going to save $0.50 per camera module and they’re not going to start selling the iPhone 13 Pro for $998.50 instead of $999.The new changes are being done to "save costs," but it remains unclear if those savings would be presented to customers.
Of course it’s not. This is going to save $0.50 per camera module and they’re not going to start selling the iPhone 13 Pro for $998.50 instead of $999.
It means they can sell more than they can make. So there's no need to drop the price. Economics 101.Mate…
Apple has had “supply constraints” (whatever they are) since the iPhone 5.
Of course, that has always be a thing in manufacturing. One the car world, the manufacturers realized that if they can reduce the number of screws on every car they make by 1, they save lots of money. I had a neighbor that worked in a car plant in Newark Delaware and he told me that they had a minimum wage (as far as minimum in UAW terms) pick up all of the dropped screws between day and night shifts and the savings far exceeded the salary 10 times over.Sure, iPhones will be 1$ cheaper!
(hint: 1$ * 50M iPhones = 50M$ savings for Apple)
I will guess that a share holder would say that it's notyea youre profit margin isnt high enough already