Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Seriously ?

Even with all the stores closed and we're shut down they set a record ??

Apple didn't close stores in Greater China until Feb 1, 2020 and they reopened them on Mar 13, 2020. They didn't close stores outside of Greater China until Mar 13, 2020.

Even with stores closed, you were still able to order online for delivery.

Apple gets the bulk of their sales from the Americas and Europe. Of the $58.313 billion in sales this quarter, 43.68% came from the Americas, 24.51% from Europe, 16.21% from Greater China, 8.93% from Japan, and 6.66% from the rest of Asia Pacific. By the time Apple started closing stores in the Americas, Europe, Japan, and rest of Asia Pacific, their fiscal quarter was almost over, so not surprising to see how well sales were.
 
Free trials means that Apple is making $0 out of it. They're absent in these figures.
Wrong, assuming Apple is following standard accounting principles, which they certainly are. Apple needs to reserve some portion of the money they received from the devices (iPhone, iPad, AppleTV) and apply it evenly over the life of the "free" trial. They have to do the same with other long term costs related to hardware sales, including reserving funds for software updates and warranty service.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Rainshadow
Wrong, assuming Apple is following standard accounting principles, which they certainly are. Apple needs to reserve some portion of the money they received from the devices (iPhone, iPad, AppleTV) and apply it evenly over the life of the "free" trial. They have to do the same with other long term costs related to hardware sales, including reserving funds for software updates and warranty service.

But that money should be accounted in the revenue from devices.
And how is that part relevant for revenue? That would be relevant for reporting profits and net sales.
 
Wrong, assuming Apple is following standard accounting principles, which they certainly are. Apple needs to reserve some portion of the money they received from the devices (iPhone, iPad, AppleTV) and apply it evenly over the life of the "free" trial. They have to do the same with other long term costs related to hardware sales, including reserving funds for software updates and warranty service.

Nope. Apple needs to take an expense on the cost of streaming bandwidth consumed by free trial users, but they absolutely do not need to reserve full retail price. Further, it does not need to be attributed to a device but can be charged on the service itself. This is the same on all free trials and demo versions of software.

The difference here is they are offering a free trial to a specific group. You are only allowed one trial per account, and trials are not extended. This is very different from embedded software and warranties which are required for all products, and benefit all owners, regardless of how many devices they own.

As you said they have to do it for actual costs. Actual cash costs generally tiny with regards to intellectual property; Cloudflare CDN, for example charges 6.25 cents per hour of streaming content, I'm sure Apple is managing less than that.
 
Last edited:
Yay! Money!
So now can they hire someone to fix ten-year-old bugs in Apple Mail?
 
WTG Apple! So sick and tired of the negative media and social media the past few months. Man up people. Now if only Cook would move their manufacturing out of China and away from those insane wet food markets that "supposedly" started this pandemic.....

If there were only another country that could produce in this scale. Sadly, there probably isn’t.
 
Tim Cook is a top 3 CEO in the world. I keep trying to tell you guys...he is incredible and this performance is insane.

Sales execution. No company is better than Apple.

From a month or two back. Enjoy, if you hadn’t already seen it:

 
  • Like
Reactions: Baymowe335
Everything is strong aside from the Mac, their weakest platform. I’d imagine the next steps there are to move to In house chips, new form factors (see current iPad Pro/magic keyboard), and a brand new OS based on iOS/iPadOS. They do this and I’m confident they can have all aspects of their business headed in the right direction. macOS is dead, it’s time to move on.

Cook really made some brilliant moves to get here and was doubted the entire time. The shift from iPhone focus to services and wearables, while growing the iPhone base through increased models and affordability proved to be genius. It’s tough to see any real path for inroads when competing against Apple. They just bought themselves another 5 years of dominance, at least.
 
Everything is strong aside from the Mac, their weakest platform. I’d imagine the next steps there are to move to In house chips, new form factors (see current iPad Pro/magic keyboard), and a brand new OS based on iOS/iPadOS. They do this and I’m confident they can have all aspects of their business headed in the right direction. macOS is dead, it’s time to move on.

Cook really made some brilliant moves to get here and was doubted the entire time. The shift from iPhone focus to services and wearables, while growing the iPhone base through increased models and affordability proved to be genius. It’s tough to see any real path for inroads when competing against Apple. They just bought themselves another 5 years of dominance, at least.
I don’t think macOS is dead. Let’s see how things look when we have a full quarter with all laptops having the new keyboard.
 
Buy the rumor, sell the news. A lot of this was baked in over the past week or so when whispers began of things getting slightly better, China stores opening, manufacturing ramping up, Gildead's drug showing good results, people in general taking the issue seriously (masks, etc.), the JHU charts showing slight improvements, etc. The market is a forward-view prediction mechanism. With this pullback, the stock will gain steam and charge forth slowly back to $310, then $325.

Apple stock is hugely owned by an incredible number of funds and institutions, more than we really know. Apple is probably on par with Berkshire Hathaway in the wideness of investment funds, especially since both companies are effectively conglomerates. As a result, the stock moves slowly, defying our fandom logic. :) Yes, Apple deserves a $400+ price tag, probably closer to $500; look at Amazon or Microsoft.

AMZN has a PE of 107, whereas AAPL is a PE of 23, and MSFT has a PE of 31.
So AAPL has annual EPS of 12.66, and PE of 23: 23*12.66 = 291, where it roughly is now.
Pretend AAPL deserves MSFT's multiple, the closest similar company, with the same EPS, 31*12.66 = 392 per share.
But let's swap AMZN's PE of 107 for AAPL: 107*12.66 = $1342 per share!

So it's likely fair to say AAPL deserves a much higher multiple than a paltry 23, compared to at least Microsoft's 31. So yeah, Apple at $285 is incredibly, hilariously, undervalued. It always has been, tho.

As many of us jokingly say here, even Wall Street still thinks "Apple is doomed". So long as iPhone has 50% or more of the total revenue, Apple is always going to be doomed. Despite the growth of Services and Wearables. iPhone has to get down to 40% (maybe 30%?) before they aren't "doomed". Cook's era has eased that concern, tho, especially with the buybacks and dividend he re-instated. They still have a ways to go.

A PE of 23 is high. Think about it, would you give me $23 dollars now for the right to $1 a year every year forever* (*forever is defined as until I go bankrupt). Apple is not undervalued, the other stocks are overvalued. Or the market expects the other stocks to radically increase their earnings. The Amazon play is obvious, there is chance that eventually a majority of US purchases will be done through them and stores, in general, will be put out of business. That is the argument. So yeah, if that happens, their earnings will go up.

I own Apple stock. Happily. But I’m not buying anymore. And I sold MSFT a long time ago. I think it is over inflated and that we are only a couple of years away from them no longer being able to charge for many of their main software assets.
 
At this stage, it would take a really stupid management team to slow Apple down. They will do just fine for a long time.
 
Crazy and impressive. Apple keeps on rolling.

Sales of iPads will jump next quarter during this pandemic. I know numerous families who have purchased or inquired with me about what to purchase to meet their needs. Oh, and I bought an iPad Air for my wife so the kids can play/learn on the 2018 model. You're welcome shareholders :p
 
Just amazing Apple. With the timing of the iPad Pro and the MacBook Air, I knew Apple would hold on, but Services? Awesome. Plus you have many who bought iPads and other devices for working from home and homeschooling.

I'm especially feeling good about the reiteration of many new, exciting, and innovative products and services in the pipeline. Can't wait to see what the rest of 2020 brings.
 
I think it’s obvious wearables and services are huge role players for Apple over the last three years now, but more than anything, they’ve really broadened their scope with offering more affordable/entry-level products with the iPad, iPhone SE 2, they even reduced the price of the iPhone 11 by ~$50 dollars, which some can’t use the excuse ‘their products are out of reach‘ for the majority, when they’re competing in Almost every segment possible, and really not missing any cues at all.

But we’re seeing a paradigm shift, with stores being closed, Apple stores were able to be profitable through online services, and I expect that trend to continue even when their stores do re-open at partial capacity. Ultimately, In the In the midst of a recession that no one could’ve predicted six months ago, and for a ‘tech’ company, I’d say these numbers are more than impressive. I don’t mean in the sense of just being profitable, just the fact that they’re holding steady and still growing.
 
2:17 pm: Luca: Products gross margin was 30.3%, decreasing 380 basis points sequentially due to loss of leverage and unfavorable mix. More pronounced drop due to COVID-19.

does anyone know what this means specifically? Loss of leverage and unfavourable mix?

Thx
 
Those customers appear to be coming from wanting a smaller form factor with the latest technology, or coming from Android. ...As opposed to "buying down."

That is something we talk about yday, looks like the world will finally got Tim Cook understand that.
 
Shame that the mac makes up so little of the sales these days. I guess that's what happens when you put in garbage components, underpowered integrated graphics into your "pro" line, and an arbitrary refreshing time that is on par with a presidential term. All for the low, low, price of 2-3x that of the competition.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.