What about the new iMac Pro + new HomePod Smart Speaker for Holidays? Apple's not talking about them or advertising them...why?
Ha. We are on the same page here. That is what I think is coming. I do believe Republicans will get some sort of tax bill passed. The repatriation is in their proposal released today. While much of that proposal won't get passed, the repatriation tax holiday is low hanging fruit that I don't think will be found objectionable by too many.
Just checked Apple stock after hours and it’s up less than 3% even though Apple’s forecast for the holiday quarter was very bullish. Amazon, Google and Microsoft release good numbers and their stock is up 5-10%. Apple puts out good numbers across all product lines and the stock barely moves. Google PE is 38, Microsoft is 31, Facebook is 40, Amazon is 278. What is Apple’s? 19. I’m with Jim Cramer. I think Apple is undervalued. And don’t trot out the BS about the law of large numbers. All those other companies I mentioned are mega cap stocks at record highs/valuations.
What about the new iMac Pro + new HomePod Smart Speaker for Holidays? Apple's not talking about them or advertising them...why?
No. It’s a good thing. Apple has created an ecosystem where users PAY for stuff from developers and media companies. That means it’s someplace that other companies want to sell their software and media wares.Anybody else find it disturbing that Apple's services are bringing so much revenue given the very high costs of their hardware?
I’d rather them buyback $100b in stock than give me a 1 time special dividend.And apparently a tidal waive of cash coming in next quarter. Possibly tax relief to repatriate cash coming. I could see Apple bringing it all back to U.S. And crazy as it sounds they could issue a $100 billion special dividend. Which actually is what I want them to do instead of succumbing to the temptation some day of buying some other huge company for cash and thereby distracting from core competencies and changing the corporate culture.
What he’s saying is aapl still trades too cheaply relative to those companies. AAPL literally makes double the net income of those companies, but Alphabet is only about 15% less valuable.Market Capitalization 11/2/17
1) AAPL: $826.2 Billion
2) GOOG: $712.87 Billion
3) MSFT: $649.57 Billion
I’m your fan.The same reason we cheer on our favourite sports team even when we are not related to them?
It’s just awesome to see Apple at the top of their game and amazing to see how such an Apple competes in today’s business landscape.
The critics and the trolls are never going to stop coming, of course. Tis a shame.
I hope you’re being sarcastic/joking.And wait until everyone returns their X to get an 8!
Obviously Apple is doing extremely well financially today, however there are numerous examples of companies that at the height of their success made decisions that ultimately lead to their demise. I suggest that you read "The Innovator's Dilemma" by Clayton Christensen.
I'm not one of those saying that Apple is Doomed, but all companies eventually disappear, or at least become shadows of their former selves.
I hope this doesn't happen to Apple. As a consumer I am more and more unhappy with many of the decisions that they make. And while there are many many Apple devotees for whom Apple can do no wrong, there are also many many that are frustrated with choices that while they may make them lots of money, aren't really in the end user's best interests.
Steve Jobs felt that if you make product that people love you will make lots of money. I don't feel like that's what Tim cook is doing. I think he is making products that have high gross margins. It will remain to be seen how long people continue to buy them.
I am anxiously awaiting the new modular Mac Pro (I know that it is a minority of a minority of the sources of Apple's revenue) and I really hope that they don't screw it up.
What he’s saying is aapl still trades too cheaply relative to those companies. AAPL literally makes double the net income of those companies, but Alphabet is only about 15% less valuable.
Ripping who off? Obviously people agree with the price if they pay it. You aren't forced or even inclined to buy an iPhone. You can stick with an old iPhone, which Apple supports well, or go to the higher market share Android OS if you want.Wrong move, ripping customers off. But perhaps your a share holder? So of course it’s fantastic for you.
iOS 11 made my original iPad Pro seem like a brand new device. I waited a while to get it but it still is coming up on two years and I'm astounded that I've used it every day and it still seems "perfect" to me and works so well. One of the best purchases I've made in terms of all the work (and play) I've used it for--hours and hours every day.
Just FYI, I have an MBA from Wharton and own well into 4 digits of AAPL shares. I’m also long Alphabet and MSFT. I say it not to brag, but to tell you I totally get that it’s about other stuff, I really do. It’s also not only about growth either, as more recently, Apple is returning to faster growth than MSFT which has a much higher multiple. It’s also about a services company versus perceived hardware company. I think AAPL is transitioning more and more to a services company and ex cash and 2018 estimates, AAPL is way cheap.If only it was just about net income. More than that, it's about earnings growth rates. Apple simply hasn't put up very impressive numbers in that department over the last few years (negative, even), so their multiples have compressed, just as everyone with a bit of experience in investing should expect. Nobody can credibly state ahead of the fact that a company is trading too cheaply relative to anything, unless they own an accurate crystal ball, because the markets are pricing in everything known about a company in real time.
Being pragmatic, the customers have spoken, and they don't think they are being ripped off.You last sentence makes no sense? I was being sarcastic,
Wrong move, ripping customers off. But perhaps your a share holder? So of course it’s fantastic for you.
Just FYI, I have an MBA from Wharton and own well into 4 digits of AAPL shares. I’m also long Alphabet and MSFT. I say it not to brag, but to tell you I totally get that it’s about other stuff, I really do. It’s not also only about growth either, as more recently, Apple is returning to faster growth than MSFT which has a much higher multiple. It’s also about a services company versus perceived hardware company. I think AAPL is transitioning more and more to a services company and ex cash and 2018 estimates, AAPL is way cheap.
In the end, it really is all about the earnings. Takes time, but that’s the game. No earnings, you’ll eventually come back to earth, particularly in a more challenging market than the current bull.
I think AAPL is worth $250-$275 today and do not see any reason they can’t be a $2T company in 5 years. With their $175b buyback, share price will increase without valuation even needing to go higher.At what price you will sell AAPL?
[doublepost=1509676835][/doublepost]If iPad and Other were graphed under the iPhone it would greatly improve the clarity.
Apple today announced financial results for the third calendar quarter and fourth fiscal quarter of 2017.![]()
For the quarter, Apple posted revenue of $52.6 billion and net quarterly profit of $10.7 billion, or $2.07 per diluted share, compared to revenue of $46.9 billion and net quarterly profit of $9 billion, or $1.67 per diluted share, in the year-ago quarter. The revenue and earnings per share numbers were company records for the fourth fiscal quarter, although the total profit fell short of the 2015 figure.
Gross margin for the quarter was 37.9 percent, compared to 38 percent in the year-ago quarter, with international sales accounting for 62 percent of revenue. Apple also declared an upcoming dividend payment of $0.63 per share, payable November 16 to shareholders of record as of November 13.
![]()
For the quarter, Apple sold 46.7 million iPhones, up from 45.5 million in the year-ago quarter. iPad sales were up to 10.3 million from 9.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2016, and Mac sales rose to 5.4 million from 4.9 million.
For the full fiscal year, Apple generated $229.2 billion in sales with $48.4 billion in net income, up from $215.6 billion in sales and $45.7 billion in net income for fiscal 2016.Apple's guidance for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 includes expected revenue of $84-87 billion and gross margin between 38 and 38.5 percent.
![]()
Apple will provide live streaming of its fiscal Q4 2017 financial results conference call at 2:00 PM Pacific, and MacRumors will update this story with coverage of the conference call highlights.
A complete transcript of Apple's fourth quarter earnings call is ahead.
Click here to read rest of article...
Article Link: Apple Reports 4Q 2017 Results: $10.7B Profit on $52.6B Revenue, 46.7M iPhones
Most people will probably disagree with me, but I think Tim has been running the company better than anyone could have done it. Sure, he’s not the inspiring, charismatic Steve, but he sure knows how to run the company.
Also, I’ve noticed he’s been a lot more involved with the products lately and is more inspiring in general.
He is doing such a fantastic job right now. I think he deserves way more credit than he’s currently getting.
Maybe it’s just me.
Just FYI, I have an MBA from Wharton and own well into 4 digits of AAPL shares. I’m also long Alphabet and MSFT. I say it not to brag, but to tell you I totally get that it’s about other stuff, I really do. It’s also not only about growth either, as more recently, Apple is returning to faster growth than MSFT which has a much higher multiple. It’s also about a services company versus perceived hardware company. I think AAPL is transitioning more and more to a services company and ex cash and 2018 estimates, AAPL is way cheap.
In the end, it really is all about the earnings. Takes time, but that’s the game. No earnings, you’ll eventually come back to earth, particularly in a more challenging market than the current bull.
I think AAPL is worth $250-$275 today and do not see any reason they can’t be a $2T company in 5 years. With their $175b buyback, share price will increase without valuation even needing to go higher.
Bottom line, I am never selling until the facts change. Undervalued today, printing money, cash hoard, tax reform, happy customers, affluent customers, great products, and terrific management.
MacStories provides a superior set of graphics for Apple's quarterly results. Today's charts are here.
Nope. Just appreciate excellent and innovative tech that provides excellent utility, and is well-priced.
Ripping who off? Obviously people agree with the price if they pay it. You aren't forced or even inclined to buy an iPhone. You can stick with an old iPhone, which Apple supports well, or go to the higher market share Android OS if you want.
You might get some n trouble if you start talking about the Note 8 in here....
the iPhone X has no new features, nothing, and you’ve called it innovative. When did Apple last ‘innovate’ it’s desktop lineup?
As for well priced, you must be a AAPL share holder.