yet they do nothing with that money. its currently in limbo. Yes it is good, but the money spent on apple products could have been spent elsewhere, where in would be going back into the economy and not sit in a big black hole (for now).
Apple's products are a luxury item, not a necessity. No one is going hungry or living in the dark because people make discretionary purchases. Right now Apple is struggling to find workspace for their current hires, and soon will be employing a lot of other trades to build the new mothership HQ.
I know and I understand. I simply want to know: Would you prefer if Apple charged 10% less and made only a 20% instead of a 30% profit margin.
Just so you shut up about your little question: I prefer Apple charge the lowest price for their products that still prevents them from outselling their supply chain. Given the current state of backorder, Apple seems to have found that sweet spot of price.
You may be surprised to find out Apple is a for-profit corporation. It is not, and has never been, their goal to give a "good deal" to anyone (if that happens to work out sometimes, so much the better, but it's not a goal). They maximize profits however they can, just like every other company out there. And as a publicly traded company, I do not think their shareholders would take too kindly to any plan that does not maximize profits.
I agree, and maximizing profits means not pricing your product so low that you cannot deliver what you sell.
If anything Apple should actually look at increasing their profit margin just a little bit. It won't hurt demand and make them even more money.
Higher prices will hurt demand, and and could affect profits. That sweet spot where you are making as much money per item as you can...AND selling everything as fast as you make it, is a very difficult number to find. Apple seems to have a knack of finding that number better then most companies I know of.
Apple is in business for it's shareholders. That is the only reason. If they are not maximizing profit and start giving discounts just to be nice the shareholders would rise up and the management would quickly be changed out. Like it or not, that is how big business works.
The only reason to discount one's price is to buy market share. There's a time and place to do that. I think Android phone manufacturers know that Apple can do that and might do that if they could make enough phones to fill the increased demand. Apple has the scale of production to undercut all but Samsung if they wanted to risk being hit with unfair trade suits.
Yeah but I don't think the growth will stall any time soon with smartphones. They are still a small percentage of all cellphones and one by one everyone will switch to smartphones probably.
Smart phones may someday be the only phones one can buy, but even then people will be looking to upgrade to the newest and latest models, thus generating a continuous market. Apple has shown that by introducing new features on a regular basis, they can lure current customers to upgrade more often than necessary. But it takes a genius company to know the right time to release a new model or the right kinds of features to add.
Well everyone except my Mom and Dad. They still have trouble with their flip phone.
Ahh, so Siri has came along at the right time to help them use their new Apple phone to its full potential.
And today we saw more proof of why the iPhone will never again be introduced in the month of June. I always thought that was a strange thing to do.
Never say never. Apple has just served notice to all its phone competitors that they cannot rely on Apple to be completely predictable. An unpredictable major competitor disrupts everyone's marketing schedules.
I'm certain someone has posted something similar, but I certainly hope that Apple doesn't forget what products have gotten them to this point. Seeing the languishing Mac Pro, then seeing computer sales represent such a small percentage of their revenue, I'd really like to see Apple commit to their computer customers.
While I would like to see Apple continue to support the high end Mac market, it may not be a viable market to do so. Compared to laptop Macs, the desktop Macs are a much smaller segment of the Mac business. According to today's numbers, the Desktop Macs were only 28% of the total Mac sales in units. I would assume that the Mac Pro is a small percent of that number.
However, Apple has continued to produce the iPod Classic, so maybe a new MacPro is still gonna happen once Intel gets the next new chips out the door.
That's a pretty vague and unsupported statement. Apple has created tens of thousands of US jobs. How many are you expecting?
People seem to forget how many tens of thousands of employees Apple has in the U.S., just because Apple doesn't do final assembly in the U.S. doesn't mean that some component manufacturing and all of the administration is here.