I wish there were more Mac-specific questions (specifically regarding the Mac Pro and the 17" MacBook Pro's fate) rather than talking about iToys the whole time.
What's the point, Apple would just repeat the line "we don't comment about future products" over and over.
re conference call
tim,
loved your response
"we need people to invent their own stuff"
you impress me again mr cook
And that comes fomr a CEO of a company with the lowest R&D budget (by far) among the peer companies.
Did you catch the music played at the end of the conference call?
It was a clip from Happy by Alexia:
Happy (sha la la)
It's so nice to be happy (sha la la)
It's so nice to be happy (sha la la)
It's so nice to be happy (sha la la)
Somebody was feeling good.![]()
Did you catch the music played at the end of the conference call?
It was a clip from Happy by Alexia:
Happy (sha la la)
It's so nice to be happy (sha la la)
It's so nice to be happy (sha la la)
It's so nice to be happy (sha la la)
Somebody was feeling good.![]()
And that comes fomr a CEO of a company with the lowest R&D budget (by far) among the peer companies.
And that comes fomr a CEO of a company with the lowest R&D budget (by far) among the peer companies.
And that comes fomr a CEO of a company with the lowest R&D budget (by far) among the peer companies.
And now we know why you're posting uninformed opinions on MR and not in a C suite anywhere.
Regarding patent disputes and recent court litigation matters:
"I'm just sick of it. We don't want to be the only company that innovates. We just want people to invent their own stuff"
-Tim Cook
CEO, Apple Inc.
And look what they've done with it.
The very definition of ROI.
Nobody disputes their profits. But profits do not equate inventions. Not even close. Patents is the closest measuring stick for inventions that we have and Apple is a patent midget.
I concentrate on profit margins and efficiency - hence dump iPhone, push phones with much lower subsidies.
The other way to look at that is to say competition is trying to duplicate an engineering concept Apple is very good at so they have to spend more.
Do you think that Samsung spending around $10 billion annually just on their semiconductor FABs are trying to duplicate Apple? Or do they duplicate Apple when they design RAM, Flash Memory, SSDs, hard drives, microprocessors, LCD panels etc.?
That's a rather facile response. Phones with lower subsidies attract fewer customers. Also, it has been pointed out that iPhone customers don't change carriers nearly as often as users of other phones. Also, iPhones work more efficiently with the networks.
It's a complicated world. You have to consider a number of factors, not just the subsidy. There may be some unhappinesss with the level of the subsidy, but if it didn't work for them they wouldn't pay it.
That would be true if people were not buying Android phones at 2:1 ratio to iPhones. I guess cheaper phones actually attract more customers.
So, Mac sales were below estimates as were iPad sales. Q3 guidance is below consensus and below Q2. I think aftermarket action is way off (it often is for many companies on the day when they report quarterly results). It does not look like AAPL is going up from now. It looks like it will go down.
You said lower subsidies though, so that means higher cost for consumers. So, now your response to declining profits is to raise prices. Yeah, that'll work!
Tell me again how outside estimates are the point of comparison. iPad sales are up year-over-year 150%. But someone said that they would triple, not double and a half. So, yeah, it's the end of the world.
I once thought that 60-90% revenue and earnings growth year over year was a good thing. But that's for the old Apple.
So the same pattern this quarter is an ominous milestone on the way to ruin. Who knew?