Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What I want to see is more intelligent use of the "swipe to unlock" process. Unlocking the phone is an extra step on top of anything that a user would want to do.

My idea: Apple could have a feature where drawing a certain (customisable) gesture would quick-launch a particular application/function. What if, for anything you had on your home screen (or any function within any app) you could set a gesture to launch it from the unlock screen? Say I had macrumors bookmarked in Safari - I could draw "MR" on my locked phone and have Safari launch it in one go.

Simpler gestures could be drawing a "C" to go straight to your contacts, "M" to go to your music, or (more cliche) draw a heart shape to automatically call your partner.

And an "X" for... :p But I like this idea a lot.

I like that, however it's already ridiculously easy for some to unlock iphones now. This is the one and only thing that I absolutely don't stand behind Apple on. I use my phone for serious business, I have contacts, forms etc . . I don't need some teenager or nosy person rummaging through my device. Apple should have some real password that under no circumstances will open up without the owner. I think gestures (alone) opening the phone would be a disaster. People would just find another way to play with your phone until they got it to open. To add to your great idea, I think it would be wise to add a feature that would be able to turn your feature on and off. For instance, right before I go for a jog, I could turn the feature on and when I'm done turn it back off.

A fingerprint scanning method built in cleverly to the home button or something would be sweet.


And for the record, I'm not a huge fan of the front facing camera. I can see some interesting situations where a front facing camera could be nifty, but video chat isn't one of them.
 
Could the patent not merely be depicting a camera that could be used on the rear in some implementations of the device - i.e. on an iPhone but in other implementations of the device it wouldn't have a camera at all - i.e. on an iPod Touch? Surely it would show two camera's otherwise and why would it specify the camera on the rear of the device but make no mention of one on the front?
 
What I want to see is more intelligent use of the "swipe to unlock" process. Unlocking the phone is an extra step on top of anything that a user would want to do.

My idea: Apple could have a feature where drawing a certain (customisable) gesture would quick-launch a particular application/function. What if, for anything you had on your home screen (or any function within any app) you could set a gesture to launch it from the unlock screen? Say I had macrumors bookmarked in Safari - I could draw "MR" on my locked phone and have Safari launch it in one go.

Simpler gestures could be drawing a "C" to go straight to your contacts, "M" to go to your music, or (more cliche) draw a heart shape to automatically call your partner.

You with me? ;) It would be so much faster and not require you to look (even if you had to have an "enter" key at the lower right corner). Applications from the app store could even have their own default gestures which you could change if you wanted. And since you can use as many fingers as you want there would be no limit to the number of gestures possible.

Thoughts?

Google's Android already uses this mechanism for unlocking the screen where you can create your own personal unlock gesture (instead of typing in a 4-digit PIN). What I do like about your idea is having a gesture to automatically launch an app, but then how would that work if you have your screen locked w/ a password/gesture.
 
What will they think of next? I can understand the problems inherent with using the interface while in motion, but am I the only one who thinks it's a mountain vs. mole hill thing?

Sure, make the interface more forgiving for fatter fingers - but if you are in motion all the time, do you really need to use the phone's interface THAT MUCH? What say all you joggers just stop running long enough to find the contact in your address book - instead of accidentally flicking your phone out of your hand - and onto the hard concrete outside? And aren't you wearing those dorky-looking arm bands anyway? :p
 
I think it's humorous that when every new patent is published, people instantly go "OOOH! NEW FEATURE TO BE ADDED! SEE, IT'S IN THE PATENT!"

Uh, many of these patents were filed before the iPhone was first released back in 2007.

While I'm sure a couple of them are truly in the early development stage when they are patented; some are also planned features that just didn't make it into the final product.
 
In regard to the rumored front facing camera as proved by line "The mobile device 100 can also include a camera lens and sensor 180. In some implementations, the camera lens and sensor 180 can be located on the back surface of the mobile device 100. The camera can capture still images and/or video." Where does that ever say anything about a front facing camera. It says that it can be on the back of the device 100 (iPhone) but never says anything about the front.

Now to add to the speculation. If in fact they did change the placement of the rear facing camera to directly above the apple logo. Is it at all possible to place another lens in the front of the iPhone on the direct opposite side of the sensor and rear facing lens? I don't know/think it is possible for a sensor to pick up images from lenses on both sides, but if it could that means they would only need 1 sensor for the device saving both space and battery (maybe, not sure about battery). Also, this could allow for very cool applications that could take advantage of front and rear facing cameras. Maybe you can pan the environment surrounding the iPhone or something cool, I dunno, leave that to Apple to conjure something up.
 
icons

does anyone else find it strange that these Apple patents use Windows/Microsoft icons and terminology for the depicted buttons? the STAR labeled Favorites (not bookmarks), the MSN Messanger icon for Contacts, etc.

strange.
 
Also, with respect to everyone asking for gestures to control the iPhone. When the iPhone was first jailbroken, there was an application called smart shuffle or something. It's aim was to replace the iPhone/iPod Touch's default media player. The smart shuffle would mainly remember which songs you skipped when shuffle came on and which songs you kept listening to and for how long, and would then be more apt to play songs from that artist or similar artists. In addition to this nifty feature, it also allowed for some cool control of music. Whilst in the application if you swipe on the screen to the right, you go to the next song, swipe to the left, go back to the previous song. Swipe up - volume up, swipe down - volume down. After un-jailbreaking, this app has since disappeared and I have yet to find it again. But it goes to show that it is in fact a possibility to include such a gesture controlled application/implementation.
 
Swipe to Type

Apple's right to be looking for an interface that doesn't require the close attention their current touch-to-do interface requires. And they're right to suspect the answer might lie in a creative use of swiping rather than touching. You can only put so much detail on a pocket-sized screen.

Here’s an alternate text input technique for the iPhone and similar devices that should be faster and more accurate for many people. It uses a feature the iPhone already has, a multi-touch screen, rather than external hardware such as a collapsible Bluetooth keyboard. You not only don’t have to look at the screen, with a little practice you can enter text in the dark even while bouncing around, as on a bus or subway. And since the only requirements for text input are basic hand coordination and a sense of touch, it makes the iPhone much more usable for the visually impaired and those with limited hand-eye coordination.

What is it?
* It uses a well-established open source standard—International Morse Code. But instead of short and long key presses, dots are input by short swipes and dashes by long swipes.

* Speed of input doesn't matter. Unlike regular Morse, which assumes a pause in sending to be a break between letters, user input can be as slow or fast as the users wants without error. Letters are distinguished by alternating swiping right/left and then up/down. (A user-set delay inputs the last character, i.e. one not followed by a swipe in a different direction.)

* Swipe mode changes when the user rotates the screen.

* Because Morse Code is already optimized for fast input in most languages, text can be entered very fast. The more often a letter is used, the shorter its Morse Code equivalent is. An e is a single short swipe and a T is a single long swipe. It couldn't be easier.

Additional Features
Morse input would also take advantage of a touch screen’s flexibility to add features that International Morse Code doesn’t have. Examples include:

* Lowercase letters are made by swiping left-to-right or up-to-down.

* Uppercase letters are made by swiping right-to-left or down-to-up. Alternately, two-finger swipes could be used for uppercase.

* Common punctuation uses diagonal swipes, i.e. upper-left to lower-right for a space, lower-left to upper-right for a period or a period plus space. Diagonal swipes with two or three fingers could have other meanings.

* Circling CCW might delete the previous character. Circling CW might enter a Return. Alternately, a short shake of the iPhone deletes the previous letter, while a longer shake deletes the previous word.

* Because text input is always a swipe that doesn't need for anything to be displayed for it to work, the entire screen is free for other uses, either display or touching without swiping. It can be used to display the text being entered, to have buttons for commands, or to show a chart for those just learning Morse. This makes maximum use of scarce screen space.

* Certain easy-to-make touches could be used to make common commands easy to do. Touching the keyboard with another finger, perhaps the thumb in the lower-left corner for right-handed people, might signify something. For instance, it might bring up a scrolling list of long, user-set text strings (i.e. a phone number or address) from which the user could select. Inside applications, it could be used for something important. Inside an email program, for instance, it could send the just-entered email. Inside a writing program, it could be used to start a new paragraph.

* In learner mode, the screen would display the Morse alphabet and text input would be on a scrolling line. Letters or words could be spoken as typed to speed up learning and accuracy.

For those willing to learn Morse, which is far easier than most people think (especially for sending), it offers a fast, virtually error-free text interface for the iPhone, one that has tactile feedback built into the design. Most important of all, it’s a text input technique that doesn’t require users to constantly look at the screen. Since the target is the entire screen, it’s impossible to miss and the touch of the screen provides the tactile feedback lacking in the on-screen keyboard.

This idea isn't just for Apple. If you like it, feel free to develop it yourself.
 
If Apple is serious about implementing video chat in future releases of the iPhone they will need to divorce themselves from AT&T. Currently, I do not believe AT&T would allow anything like video chat/conferencing over an iPhone on their 2.5, I mean,3G network. If the rumors that the slingplayer for iPhone has been rejected at AT&T's request pan out then they definitely will not allow video chat/conferencing. It's time for Apple to consider carriers other than AT&T.

AT&T redacted that part of the TOS:

The language added on March 30 to AT&T's wireless data service Terms and Conditions was done in error. It was brought to our attention and we have since removed it. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

via Endaget

So it is wide open for iChat. Not to mention the speed will be faster with the upcoming "increase in speed" brought by AT&T.

Pat

twitter.com/patrick_dunn
mystudentloans.tumblr.com
 
Don't think this is going to happen. May not be on this next device but in the future.

No matter what improvements at&t makes to their 3G network there is no way that it'll be able to handle video calls. It will come crashing down.
 
No. Waay too late for a patent right? And do you remember the patent Apple did on the 3D desktops? they haven't incorporated this so far into snow leopard, so that makes me think the same for the iPhone and this patent application, if you see what i mean.

-Sam

Not really, apple patents any new idea so they have an idea bank secured. Although this is very close to the release, but it could happen. I think its gonna be 4G iPhone that will have front-camera. 3G network can't handle such huge amount of data.
 
Ok, plenty of news about the features, now tell us what SoC the bloody thing will use! It's killing me to not have credible rumors there.
 
It labels the camera (#180) in the photo and says in some implementations it could be back-facing -- implying the depicted implementation is front-facing.

Talk about a swing and a miss.

The whole document is about detecting the rate of change of motion with a sensor that "includes one or more of an accelerometer, gyroscope, compass, IR detector, sonic detector, altimeter, magnetic field detector, RF detector, GPS, light sensor, and doppler detector."

The document has nothing to do with a user operating the camera (if that is even the sensor utilized). The system would use input from the camera, "employing a pattern recognition algorithm", to determine motion and adjust the UI accordingly. It would all be as transparent as the proximity sensor when you bring the phone up to your face or the ambient light sensor adjusting the screen brightness.

Therefore, in one implementation, a camera can be located on the back surface - implying in another implementation the sensor can be a gyroscope, and in another it can be an accelerometer.

Way to produce hype, though. Let me try my hand at it.

New iPhone may have multi-touch capacitive back panel!

According to a patent application filed by Apple, they are looking into employ a "grip detector" [0071] to sense when the iPhone is held in the hand. The grip detector may detect the presence of "least one, two, three, and four fingers". For example, a call can automatically be placed on hold or on speaker phone when it is set down by the user. It is also possible that the phone can automatically be locked/unlocked when the user grabs the phone. Third party apps (notably games) can have one action associated with tapping the screen, and another with tapping the back - hello first person shooters! On-screen controls navigate and tapping the back of the device can act like a trigger.
 
It a sort of funny the patents star emerging right before the release of the new iphone. Last year a patent emerged about the use of iChat (cannot remeber the specifics but it's on this site)and the patent showed a front facing cam and myself allong with the masses on the forum thought it would be in 3g iPhone. Now here we are a year later. With more patents and the talk of using diff. Kinds of sensors. Will these emerge (meaning the patents)in the new iPhone?who's to say. I do however think that the patent will most likely be added to a firmware update.
 
AT&T redacted that part of the TOS:

The language added on March 30 to AT&T's wireless data service Terms and Conditions was done in error. It was brought to our attention and we have since removed it. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

via Endaget

So it is wide open for iChat. Not to mention the speed will be faster with the upcoming "increase in speed" brought by AT&T.

Pat

twitter.com/patrick_dunn
mystudentloans.tumblr.com

AT&T did indeed redact that part of the TOS. However, rumors are circulating on many popular sites this morning that AT&T has requested that Apple reject the slingplayer iPhone app due to bandwidth concerns.

SlingPlayer for iPhone may be facing opposition from AT&T.

and

SlingPlayer for iPhone rejected at AT&T's request.

Now, if AT&T is bold enough to block apps such as the slingplayer I would not be surprised at all if they attempted to block video chat/conferencing apps as well.
 
New Feature!

Hold on, if the iPhone could detect motion, then perhaps this opens up the way for the feature I have been wanting most of all:

Combining information about this "motion" described, with information from the GPS and perhaps even camera, your iPhone will soon be able to tell when you are in your car! When this is detected, it automatically goes into "airplane mode", meaning it neither sends nor receives any calls, texts, etc. When the user of this future iPhone attempts to make a call anyway, a new "taser" functionality shocks the bejesus out of said user, and a scolding voice tells them to focus on the road, d*mnit!

That is the only feature I ask for. Note that I do not have an iPhone, but I would pay Apple the price of an iPhone, in gratitude, if they were to implement this feature on the next iPhone, in a way that is so hard-wired into the phone that even Jail-breaking will not be able to de-activate this feature.

:D
 
Talk about a swing and a miss.

The whole document is about detecting the rate of change of motion with a sensor that "includes one or more of an accelerometer, gyroscope, compass, IR detector, sonic detector, altimeter, magnetic field detector, RF detector, GPS, light sensor, and doppler detector."

The document has nothing to do with a user operating the camera (if that is even the sensor utilized). The system would use input from the camera, "employing a pattern recognition algorithm", to determine motion and adjust the UI accordingly. It would all be as transparent as the proximity sensor when you bring the phone up to your face or the ambient light sensor adjusting the screen brightness.

Therefore, in one implementation, a camera can be located on the back surface - implying in another implementation the sensor can be a gyroscope, and in another it can be an accelerometer.

The patent never mentions the camera has anything to functionality with the stated features. They also mention the ringer on/off switch, which also has nothing to do with the features discussed. Therefore, you have to take that entire statement by itself.

Granted what we have, it's completely sound for arn to assume a logical conjugate using the given words.

There's no reason to be so caustic about it.

Hold on, if the iPhone could detect motion, then perhaps this opens up the way for the feature I have been wanting most of all:

Combining information about this "motion" described, with information from the GPS and perhaps even camera, your iPhone will soon be able to tell when you are in your car! When this is detected, it automatically goes into "airplane mode", meaning it neither sends nor receives any calls, texts, etc. When the user of this future iPhone attempts to make a call anyway, a new "taser" functionality shocks the bejesus out of said user, and a scolding voice tells them to focus on the road, d*mnit!

By motion, it almost certainly refers to instances of acceleration, not constant velocity, which would be the case most of the time in the car. This is contrast to running/walking/jogging, where rhytmic movement would result in constant accelerative forces.
 
Hi, long time reader and a new MacBook owner, so I decided to start an account.

When I was looking at the patent pics, there's some other devices. 5A looks like an iPhone nano (It is, in fact, smaller). 5B looks like a new iPod touch with an new interface but it has the phone and carrier information up top. (???) 6 looks like the iPhone, but there's some changes to the interface and has no carrier information up top.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    113.2 KB · Views: 102
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    58.3 KB · Views: 102
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    77.6 KB · Views: 97
Hi, long time reader and a new MacBook owner, so I decided to start an account.

When I was looking at the patent pics, there's some other devices. 5A looks like an iPhone nano. 5B looks like a new iPod touch with an new interface. 6 looks like the iPhone, but there's some changes to the interface.

All depictions clearly show a phone icon in the bottom left hand corner. Two of them show different home screen icons, but they appear to be on different "pages." Figure 6 is missing the carrier graphics, but this may be in order to not obscure the label "602", as it still appears to be a phone evidenced by the text icon in addition to the phone icon.
 
i'm finally getting hope the new phone won't be just as miserable of a small update like the 3g was to the 2g. they better really impress me this time around.
 
Wow Wow Wow...

Wait one minute!!! does this say anything about the label "166"? Because that may be an indicator light for sms/email/pushnotifications... someone please find out...cause it may just be the headphone jack...but i don't think so!
 
Wait one minute!!! does this say anything about the label "166"? Because that may be an indicator light for sms/email/pushnotifications... someone please find out...cause it may just be the headphone jack...but i don't think so!

"An audio jack 166 can also be included for use of headphones and/or a microphone. "

No luck
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.