HOLD YOUR HORSES EVERYBODY!
This is likely not a proprietary connector at all, but a new standard we're not familiar with.
Apple doesn't make hard drives. Therefore, someone must be making hard drives to fit in these machines. Apple doesn't want to rely on a single source, so that means multiple businesses are making these drives.
These people can sell these drives in the aftermarket to mac users.
Further, they aren't going to tool up and design a custom hard drive for Apple.
Apple has learned this lesson already. Apple does not forget lessons- especially painful ones!
This is going to turn out to be a standardized connector and part of the SATA Standard. It might not be the common, popular, backwards with SATA-1 connector... but nobody up and down the supply chain likes one off, specific designs.
The forces for standardization are VERY powerful.
And having read Apple news for the past 3 decades, I know a lot of BS gets out there, and people jump to conclusions only to later be proven wrong, but when it happens, everyone forgets that they were all up in arms about it (But the general "apple wants to screw you over" mantra persists.)
I've never been screwed over by Apple and I've never had to pay too much for any Apple part, device, accessory or product.
Apple is not going to make a one off hardware standard in order to get an extra $30 from the few people who open their iMacs to upgrade the drives.
Let's get real.
You don't know too much about Apple history. You should look it up. They are very much capable of ordering proprietary connectors. In case you haven't noticed, they have enough clout to have mfg's build or assign entire factories to their needs. $$$$$ talks.
So Apple is in essence giving their computers a life span of 3-5 years... Major fail!
Well if you want to be a "power user" on a mac there is always the Mac Pro, which is built to be upgradable.
The iMac is an all in one, and even having built my own desktop some years ago I would not be willing to use a suction cup to yank the screen off of a 27 inch display to put a $200 upgrade in a $2000 computer.
If the HDD was easily accesible then I might actually care, but not in this case.
But maybe that is just me...
If Apple took that ability away, I'll seriously consider switching my whole business to Windows 7 (8 is coming up, too, and it looks good).
I am glad I did not jump on the new iMac - I'll wait to see how this shakes out.
Greedy bastards![]()
They are pretty much saying fans will kick on all the way, the system will pretty much overheat and shut down...
Can someone please clarify:
The report says that replacing the hard drive will make the fans spin at full speed, and it will make the Apple Hardware Test suite fail.
Then it goes on to say that replacing the hard drive turns the Mac into a paperweight. That implies that the Mac is rendered completely unusable -- that it cannot even boot.
Note that for retail copies of OS X, the AHT utilities are located on a separate disc, and they are not installed by default. So AHT does not customarily run during power-up, in order to impose a restriction on booting.
So, is there some other side-effect, implied but not actually stated in this article, which actually does have the effect of preventing the Mac from being able to boot up after the hard drive is replaced?
If so, then come out and say it. If not, then what we're really dealing with here is an inconvenience foir sure -- ridiculously loud fans and false negative results in AHT -- but not a paperweight.