So Apple's stock is $630 right now. If they drop to $600 tomorrow, should they pay their employees about 4.8% less?
No... especially given stock price isn't anchored in a company's actual value... just what investors are willing to pay at the moment...? I'm not sure I understand why you asked this.
My what?
organizations with lots of money don't need to waste it.
Paying your employees a living wage isn't a waste. It boosts morale, self-esteem, has proven to increase productivity and creativity (as well as loyalty), and oh, right, helps
people.
Exactly where in my post did I state, allude to or imply I thought corporations ought to waste money...?
Apple is successful in the first place partially because it didn't waste money.
Depends on your definition of waste, I suppose. On the other hand, it would have been difficult to have "wasted" nearly $100b. And if you knew anything about Apple's history, they've actually sunk quite a bit into R&D etc. that ended up netting absolutely nothing (yes, probably more than most companies).
Cisco used to have zero TV ads. But wait, according to your "clue", it was the biggest company in the world, so shouldn't it have been hiring more ad producers?
Uh. I suppose.... if statistical analyses of its target demographic indicated a financial return for the use of advertisements..?
By the way... the "ad producers" would have cost very little in relation to the cost of the actual advertisements.
Also, assuming they had no "ad producers," talking about hiring "more" sounds a bit silly.
Similarly, every company that is worth >$0 that does not run TV ads is not employing enough people, according to this. Koenigsegg and DeLorean are tyrants exploiting the people!
What are you on, exactly? This has literally no relevance to anything I've said... not that the rest of your post did.
And DeLorean? As in... the all-but-defunct car company that never sold any of their crappy cars in the first place to anyone other than Doc Emmet Brown? Why the hell of all possible companies would you bring them up? Probably would have been more appropriate to lament the lack of advertisement coverage your beloved Z06 gets. (I'm assuming the Z06 at the end of your name's referencing the 'Vette.)
And again, why are you talking about television ads?