Not really, still serves its intended designed purpose.If Apple's going to make it easier for thieves to locate, then it's just a useless fashion accessory.
Not really, still serves its intended designed purpose.If Apple's going to make it easier for thieves to locate, then it's just a useless fashion accessory.
It's not an anti theft tracking device.In other words, making it even less useful as an anti-theft tracking device.
Correct, they’re not designed to track stolen items. Get it?If someone steals your item, they get continually warned that it's being tracked.
Yup. As handy as they would have been, Airtags are now useless for tracking down your items that have been stolen because a couple of people misused them and it generated heaps of press. Apple is in CYA mode rather than thinking of practical use, and CYA mode is never good for the average customer.If I am understsanding correctly, the AirTag is useless for attaching to items in case they get stolen. The thief gets alerted if they have an iPhone and can find and discard the AirTag. Am I correct?
So again, to make this crystal clear, the intended purpose of an AirTag is to help you find your personal items that
* you've misplaced in familiar locations,
* you've left behind in unfamiliar locations, that
* a Good Samaritan could be helped to return to you,
* but are no use in the case of theft.
Is that a good explanation of their current purpose and value?
And yet Find My is used for anti-theft purposes every day to locate stolen phones. It's obvious to everyone including Apple that these features would be used for anti-theft purposes. Claiming Apple never intended them to be so isn't a persuasive argument, no matter what Apple publicly states.Well, that’s because it is NOT an anti-theft tracking device, has never been intended to be an anti-theft tracking device, and Apple has specifically stated it is not to be used for that purpose. The same goes for the Find My app. It’s the public who started using it for that as well as stalking their ex’s and Apple is trying to put a stop to it.
Yup. I was going to buy more, but now I'm looking for other options.This seems to render them totally useless for non-nefarious purposes.
Seems that's already mostly the case.In a future update the AirTags will stop tracking completely and their sole remaining purpose will be to just look pretty and shiny.
Just buy her a considerably more expensive AppleWatch with cellular and remind her to charge it every day. 😉I understand the risks of stalkers using these, but my mother-in-law has early stages of Alzheimer's and we were hoping to use AirTags to find her if she happened to wander away from her apartment and get confused. She doesn't live with us, so to the AirTag it appears we're stalking someone, which I guess technically we would be, but it's the "good" kind of stalking.
Yeah, but it seems not all AirTags get changed. Two of mine have and two haven't. I guess Apple is having a bet both waysPeople keep mentioning the intended purpose. Personally, I don't really care what the intended purpose is. A more useful purpose is anti-theft tracking and it is frustrating that they keep changing the functionality of AirTags to eliminate the additional benefit they provided.
That would be a good start, but Family Sharing is a must.
Sounds like features that were not made for the person that purchased the AirTag.Also introduced in update 2.0.24, if a user's iPhone is awake, a new notification alerts them when an AirTag that's been separated from its owner is nearby and emitting a sound to indicate it has been moved. It can then be tracked down by sound or Precision Finding if the feature is available. Apple says that this change will also help if the AirTag sound is hard to hear or if the speaker has been tampered with
Wipe them down with alcohol. That should remove the coating. You'll see a brown shmutz on the cloth afterwards.Now if only you could buy a battery that works with an Airtag, as it stands I have purchased THREE brands, and none of them work due to the coatings on the bottom.
It seems unless I order online or just buy another Airtag I am going to lose the ones on my keys eventually.
I believe that FindMy doesn’t allow a stranger to use precion finding to locate your item. It only alerts if the Airtag is tracking with their location. So it won’t just alert everyone who passes near an AirTag. Rather, if a person stumbles on the lost item, then yes, depending on the intent of the finder, they will either chose to steal or return the item using the AirTag information. Either way, I don’t see how the AirTag is an assistant to a thief.Even for your use case, the latest changes might be an issue depending on which kind of place you are living in with regards to general safety.
If you lose/forget an item somewhere, having your AirTag start actively advertise itself to anyone around it and allow for precision finding can be double-edged sword: it could allow for a good samaritan to find the AirTag and return the item to you, or it could also tip-off less honest people that there is something valuable to grab in their surroundings and guide them to your item using precise location (effectively acting as a thief-assistant).
So if you are living in a place where a wallet left on the street has a very high probability to be returned to the police or the original owner by a pedestrian, this makes sense. But if on the other end in your place you would most likely expect never to see the full content of that wallet again, then the AirTag is likely to assist thieves with finding and stealing your item before you can get to it yourself.
Agree. As a purchaser of the device when it was originally released, I feel they have changed the feature set to a point whereby it is no more delivering the value I originally paid for. I know Apple will use privacy protection at a justification and I understand the concerns, but then it is their responsibility for not considering this in the first place and releasing an unsustainable device (and they should offer refunds instead of killing the features original buyers were expecting for the price they paid).
Wondering if in some countries this could lead to cases with consumer protection agencies (a key point here is that Apple is auto updating the device and not giving any option for the user to preserve the original feature set).
That's my sense from the comments as well.People keep mentioning the intended purpose. Personally, I don't really care what the intended purpose is. A more useful purpose is anti-theft tracking and it is frustrating that they keep changing the functionality of AirTags to eliminate the additional benefit they provided.
I'm wondering how accurate this is. It'd be worth it to have a few sources for this since it seems to get contested any time AirTag news hits MacRumors.Apple always stated that anti theft wasn’t the purpose of AT’s.
In other words, making it even less useful as an anti-theft tracking device. When Apple gets done with all these AirTag firmware updates the only remaining feature will be finding the AirTag sitting right in front of you.
I've seen baggage handlers mentioned a lot regarding Airtags. I doubt they will get pinged a lot. I assume the notifications happen if the Airtag follows/goes with you for a certain amount of time. These handlers keep moving luggage to other handlers and unlikely any of them travels with a piece of luggage for long enough to get a notification. However, I would be curious to see a good investigative piece of journalism on this subject. Would make for fun/light reading. For now I think it is mostly speculation.Those poor baggage handlers at the airport who own iPhones. That thing will be pinging constantly.