Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I expected an accessory on par with a display to connect your computer to, not a whole computer.
People wanting to do video editing will complain at the M2 lack of power, or lack of video editing software, while other will resent the need to connect to their Mac. I would have been happy with a device that just connects to your Mac or iPad through hdmi, thunderbolt or airplay, not a Half-assed computer that just reads emails or surf the web.

Wait, now you can go to the loo with your headset on, and feel like doing poo-poo in a forest like a squirrel, Rick Sanchez style, THAT is a revolution.
More seriously, 'spatial audio'; the words 'dolby atmos' were never used, bummer, maybe next time.

I hope I'm wrong, but I'm afraid only porn and kitties will decide wether this product is a success or not.

Waiting for cad apps taking advantage of 3D vision and gesture, Tony Stark style.

No no, that's not the apple way.

A display that you connect to a computer would mean that years from now; the headset would still be useful since you can upgrade your computer and still have a headset capable of handling the latest software. No different from how decade old monitors and speakers are still usable today.

Integrate it with a computer; and 5 years from now that M2 SOC will be too slow to run the latest apps and you're forced to throw the whole thing in the bin to buy a newer $3500 headset.

That's the apple way.
 
1. FUNCTIONALITY

The demo is just beautiful. However, I may have noticed some lag. Will it work well? Will the input work well? Is it comfortable for wearing for hours? It is an ambitious product, but it if fails to work well enough, it may flop even if it sells well at the beginning.
I am admittedly not sold on the user input methods. I guess there may be a way to connect an external keyboard and mouse and use it like a desktop, because I can't see myself editing videos using gestures (which I assume will work via the Kinect sensor in Face ID), or dictating long forum responses via Siri.

Otherwise, I will largely be using it in scenarios where I consume content passively with minimal interaction or input required on my end.
2. PRICE

If you ask me, I would say it is a bargain. If it works as intended, it is just like the ultra-high-tech equipment you can only see in futuristic movies worn by multi-billionaires, except it costs $3,500 and not the dozens of billion dollars you might think of.

Still, $3,500 is a lot of money and most people cannot afford it. You may say it is a luxury product. Well, it is, but Apple needs to sell to the masses if it wants to convince developers to make new software that supports it. If it does not have exclusive software and has to rely on iPhone apps, what is the point of having it?
I don't really mind the high price, because the trend of tech is that prices tend to go down over time as performance and efficiency rises. Start with a small user base, build up the use case, and gradually get the buy in of more and more people over time.
3. SOCIAL FACTOR

I know many people who bought the iPhone, the iPad, the Apple Watch, the MacBook Air, or the iMac because they were cool. Taking an iPhone out of the pocket is cooler than doing that with an Android phone. The Vision Pro does not look cool; it looks nerdy.
I guess even Apple is aware of this, given how much of their demo involved a single person indoors. Perhaps we may see more people comfortable with using this in public in the future (they would be the future version of today's "smartphone zombies").
4. THE NOVELTY

How many people will buy it at $3,500 on the first outing and without having it tested thoroughly? I mean, the Google Glass looked far cooler and never passed the test stage to make it to the final consumer. Apple is being really bold.
You do get a 2-week return policy, and that's where the Apple Store comes in - to let people test it out and get a sensing of it first before committing to a purchase. I think this is where Apple is uniquely positioned to succeed. They have the infrastructure in place to promote and support wearables for the long term.
 
I literally screamed THAT during this presentation LOL
I get that it sounds cool in theory as this new kind of tech, but I can’t even imagine this being accepted by most people on your call. Your other participants wouldn’t stop commenting on this weirdness haha
It’s super weird yeah. I’d never use FaceTime with this thing
 
This is not new tech, I hate to break it to you. Strapping this on and playing video games alone has been done. And so on and so forth. The Cult of Mac folks are alive and well.
People said the exact same thing about the fact that MP3 players already existed when Apple announced the iPod. And the iPhone.

https://www.macrumors.com/2001/10/23/apples-new-thing-ipod/


 
This is the first time I have ever viewed a demo of a headset like this. The other headsets that have been in existence have had no penetration because so few have seen them. Lots of people will see this for the first time, and experience this when you can walk in an Apple Store and demo this at some point in the next several months. I’m fascinated by the potential of it, in situations when I am alone and want to explore, to make my small apartment seem huge and limitless, and to not be bound by physical screens. It would be weird to wear with other people in the room. Apple cleverly made videos of people doing just that, going from VR to AR and interacting with both the real and virtual worlds. If two people with Vision Pros sit next to each other, would there be a “continuity” or “hand off” feature that would let them completely share the same visual space? If they can make this look more and more like regular glasses over time, I could see it replacing a bunch of Apple products, because all of the screens from other apple devices could be projected out into the space in front of you. It does open a world of possibility. They said it STARTS at $3499. I wonder if that comes with 256 GB of storage and 8 GB of RAM as standard base model spec. The next version will have a M3 which should be a big leap forward.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
Wonder if part of the high price is the availability of a personal fitting appt like Patel got where they scan your head to determine the right headband and to add prescription lenses? I assume you would have to live near an Apple Store for this.
Nah. They will likely just have an iPhone app for that.
 
Ok to summarize - a ton of high end sensors, and the most advanced displays for something that nobody asked for and nobody needs.

3500 for a product that does nothing useful - that however, forces a user to wear goggles all day long - I don't care how comfortable they make these, frankly, nobody wants this.

It is a product created for a "ready player 1" dystopian future, I knew that, but what I do find surprising is that they couldn't really find a hook to sell it.

What does it do that helps me live my life?

Some here said HD po_rn will look great on this - ew. That's it?
It may not do anything for you but I am very interested in how it can give you a work space with multiple virtual screens that you can setup wherever you find a seat.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.